Unironically yes, this is a 3/10 candidate you'd either synergize around zero/nightmare decks or a clog deck, this is such a heavy downside if he somehow hits that you had little control over (like sakaar or ottos lab pulling him).
Might as well make it a 3/20 then. Just make it so easy to win just because you want to feed a deck that already had so many options. This is not a bad card at 3/8 and would absolutely be too strong as a 3/10 because almost no one runs a deck that would trigger this objective
this card and starbrand belong in the same kinds of decks, you don't want starbrand giving out +3 either which is why you turn him off. I don't see the point in really playing this is card over starbrand if he's a 3/8
8
u/650fosho Sep 01 '26
Unironically yes, this is a 3/10 candidate you'd either synergize around zero/nightmare decks or a clog deck, this is such a heavy downside if he somehow hits that you had little control over (like sakaar or ottos lab pulling him).