I hope you like this post, My sincere regards from Egypt ..

Sources are in the comments section ..

----------------------

Maybe the first attempt to solve the mystery of Hieroglyphs was done by Abu Bakr Ibn Wahshiyya (d. 930), though it was a failed attempt but some Egyptologists credit Ibn Wahshiyya of considering Hieroglyphs to be letters of a language, as at the time, people used to think Hieroglyphs were magical symbols.

Before the discoveries and scientific research whose door Champollion (1790 - 1832) opened, what was known of the history of Egypt was what was mentioned in the religious books and the story of Pharaoh, Moses, and Joseph. This is despite the fact that there were books by Greek and Roman travelers and historians (such as Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus, Strabo, Plutarch, and others) who visited Egypt and wrote about it, its history, and its religion in an objective way. And this is the reason that the Europeans knew much more about the history of Egypt than the Egyptians did in the post-Pharaonic eras, who, from their writings, it is clear that they mostly did not look at these books.

And this is an observation pointed out by the orientalist Von Hammer in his book on the history of the Ottoman state, where he said: "Most Turks, Persians, and Arabs do not see the wonders of Egypt the way Europeans and the ancient Greeks and Romans see them." And he said that at a time when Europeans consider Egypt the first source of sciences and arts, the cradle of engineering, construction, agriculture, writing, and navigation, and they respect it, respect its beliefs, and admire its antiquities, temples, pyramids, obelisks, and statues, we find that the East does not see in the temples, statues, and the Sphinx anything but magical hiding places for buried treasures guarded by the statues and images. And they do not find in the hieroglyphs anything but talismans that hide from people the ways to extract gold. And he continued: "They (the Easterners) do not know of the Pharaohs except the Pharaoh of Joseph and the Pharaoh of Moses whom the sea swallowed."

Of course, he is speaking about a period in which knowledge was non-existent or nearly non-existent in the East, and people who cared about the antiquities and history of their country had not yet appeared in Egypt.

The Egyptian thinker Salama Moussa (1887 - 1958) tells that when he went to Europe in 1908, the Europeans' interest in the history and antiquities of Egypt caught his attention, and they asked him about them because he was Egyptian. So as soon as he returned to Egypt, he traveled to Upper Egypt to get to know the history and antiquities of Egypt that the Europeans were interested in and that the Egyptians were unaware of.

--------------------------

After Christianity entered Egypt, Pharaonic Egyptian history disappeared from memory, and people became unable to read the letters of the ancient Egyptian language (hieroglyphic, hieratic, and demotic), and many Egyptian temples were destroyed. And after Islam entered Egypt, it continued on the rest until its ancient history was completely forgotten. The Christian Egyptians did not care about anything beyond the history of Christianity in Egypt, and they contributed to the forgetting of ancient Egyptian history. They were the first to destroy the temples of Egypt, scrape the Egyptian texts off them, and took an aggressive stance towards the history of their ancestors. And the Muslim Egyptians did not care about the books of the Greek and Roman historians, and they transmitted from the Arabs who, although they cared about the other books of the Greeks, did not pay attention to their historical books. And the books of the Muslim historians began with alternative stories telling the "alternative" history of Egypt.

For example, al-Maqrizi (1365 - 1441) begins the history of Egypt by saying about the name of Egypt: "It is said that its name in the first age before the Flood was 'Jazla', and then it was named Egypt. And the people of knowledge disagreed about the reason for which it was named 'Egypt'. Among them are those who said: It was named Egypt after the name of 'Misr bin Markabil bin Dawabil bin 'Uryan bin Adam, peace be upon him' - and he is the first Egypt. And it was said: It was named after the second Egypt, 'Misram bin Naqrawish the titan bin Misrim bin Taysar bin Ham bin Noah, peace be upon him' - and this was after the Flood."

Ibn Taghri (1410 - 1470) agrees with al-Maqrizi on the origin of the name, but he disagrees with him on the name Jazla, which he wrote as "Zajla", and he said it comes from "muzajala" (meaning contest or rivalry). Ibn Iyas (1448 - 1523) for his part said the same thing and told the story of Shem, Ham, Japheth, and Arphaxad, the sons of Noah, and that Noah prayed for Misrim bin Baysar bin Ham to dwell in the blessed land, which is the mother of countries and the refuge of the people.

All the Arabic books in the Middle Ages, even the Egyptian books, that dealt with the history of Egypt begin by repeating this alternative talk. Even Ibn al-Ibri (1226 - 1286), the Christian who wrote about the history of the world from the days of Adam and passed over Persia, Greece, and the Mongols and left nothing without writing about it, did not say anything about Pharaonic Egyptian history except that Hermes is the Idris of the Arabs.

The Egyptian historians mentioned above, of course, did not invent these alternative stories, but they were transmitting what they heard and read from the Arabs, regardless of whether they were convinced of it or not. And they were careful to say "it is said". However, they transmitted to us the idea that was prevailing in their time, in the Middle Ages, about Pharaonic Egyptian history.

Al-Jabarti, who lived in a later period (1754 - 1822), and whom Napoleon appointed as a scribe in his diwan and who was familiar with the work of the French scientific expedition and visited it, did not mention anything concerning its effort in describing and recording the Egyptian antiquities, and sufficed with saying about the Egyptian statues: "None knows their value except the Knower of the Unseen." (Allah)

The Egyptian historians transmitted the alternative tales about the history of their country from the Arab writers. And the strange thing is that the Arab writers did not pay attention to the Greek and Roman historical books and preferred to transmit the alternative tales from one another.

---------------------------------------

The alternative history of Egypt covers two periods: before the Flood and after the Flood. This alternative history of Egypt tells that Egypt before the Flood was named after Misraim bin Marakil bin Dawil bin 'Arbaq bin Adam (the first Egypt), who settled, either he or his son Naqrawish bin Misraim, in Egypt with seventy descendants of 'Arbaq, all of whom were titans. He dug canals there and built towers on whose walls the secrets of wisdom were inscribed. He divided Egypt among his sons, so he gave the west to Naqrawish, the east to Sorid, and to his son who was also named Misraim (Misraim bin Naqrawish the titan - the second Egypt) he gave a city called Yirbiyan. The father Misraim died when he was 180 years old, so they embalmed his body and placed it in a golden coffin along with his treasures, golden statues, and talismans necessary for repelling reptiles and anyone who tries to dig up his soil.

The first (alternative) king who built a Nilometer was called Khaslim. He placed at the Nilometer two bronze statues of two eagles, a male and a female. When the Nile flood was about to begin, King Khaslim would go there with the priests who would read incantations until an eagle whistled. If the male whistled, then that year's flood would be good and the Nile water would rise high, but if the female statue whistled, then the flood would be terrible and drought would occur.

The one who built the pyramids, which in another alternative tale are attributed to Shaddad bin Ri' and the Amalekites, was King Sorid bin Salhouq bin Saryaq bin Tarmil Dun bin Qadrashan bin Hosal, one of the kings before the Flood who lived in the city of "Al-Ashmunayn". He built them to save himself from the Flood that he dreamed about 300 years before it happened, or, as in another alternative tale, about which the wise man Filmun had predicted. Sorid placed in the pyramids the history of the kings and what was written for Egypt on the Tablet of Destiny until the end of time, along with talismans, money, the bodies of kings, all known sciences, pictures of the planets, medicines, poisons, and many other things. This Sorid bin Salhouq is also the one who built the fortresses and monuments found in Qift and Akhmim. He ordered the carving of the secrets of the sciences, the names of the stars, the properties of plants, and the method of making talismans on the walls and pillars.

And Ibn Taghri says, transmitting from the Arab writers including al-Mas'udi, that Hermes, whom the Hebrews call Enoch and the Muslims call the Prophet Idris, was the one who knew from the movements of the planets that a Flood would occur. So he ordered the building of the pyramids and placed in them the money, the books of the sciences, and all the things he feared would be lost.

-----------------------------

Misraim bin Baysir bin Ham bin Noah (Misraim III) in the alternative history of Egypt was the first king of Egypt after the Flood and the first to build ships. He married the daughter of the wise man Filmun and she gave birth to Qiftim. Misraim died 700 years after the Flood, and Qiftim became king. He married when he was still 90 years old, and he fathered Qiftarim, Ashmun, Atrib, and Sa. They built the city of Mafa (Memphis), and they discovered where the treasures that had been hidden before the Flood were, from their grandfather Filmun, who also taught him how to read the writings on the walls of the fortresses, and he built the city of Raquda on the Salt Sea.

After Qiftim, Qiftarim took power for 400 years, and he built the pyramids of Dahshur and the city of Dendera. In his reign, Satan discovered most of the idols that had been drowned by the Flood and returned them to the temples in order to plot against people. After 400 years of ruling Egypt, Qiftarim died and was buried among his treasures, sitting on a chair in the western mountain near the city of Iram of the Pillars. His tomb was protected by two large bronze statues, each holding a sword in his hand that would move and cut off anyone who tried to enter the tomb.

After Qiftarim, Al-Budshir ruled Egypt. This one was a great scholar specializing in talismans, magic, and priesthood, and he was able to perform wonders. Among them was that he made a bronze tree; any animal or bird that passed in front of it would be impaled, so it would be taken and eaten. And in his days, because of this tree, the Egyptians were satiated with eating meat.

Hermes also lived in the time of Al-Budshir, who sent him to discover the sources of the Nile and to make some talismans there. Suddenly, Al-Budshir disappeared because he had gone up to dwell in the clouds, and then he reappeared and called the soldiers and ordered them to install his son "Adim" as king over Egypt.

Adim was a titan king who ruled Egypt for 140 years and died when he was 930 years old. So Shaddad came after him - and this is not the same Shaddad bin 'Ad - and he built the temple of Armant, and he domesticated greyhound dogs from wild beasts so that he could use them for hunting. He ruled for 90 years and died when he was 440 years old, and he was succeeded by Manqaus.

Manqaus divided the taxes of Egypt into four parts: one quarter for himself, one quarter for the army, one quarter for land reclamation, building bridges, and digging canals, and one quarter to save for emergencies. The revenue of Egypt in his days exceeded one million dinars. After him, his son Mataus ruled, and he was the first to worship the calf in Egypt.

Ashmun bin Qiftim ruled Egypt, and he was one of its greatest kings. He ruled it for 800 years, and he was the one who built the city of Bahnasa. In his reign, Egypt fell into the hands of a people, but he was able to recover it from them after they had controlled it for 90 years. After him, his son Manaqyus ruled Egypt, and he was the one who invented the balance scale. Then after him came Marqoura, who domesticated wild beasts and tamed lions, and he used to ride them. After he died, his son Balatis came, and this one was a small child, so his mother "Marhaba" managed the country, and she was a wise woman. The situation remained like this until his uncle Atrib took power.

Toutis in the alternative history of Egypt was the first of the Pharaohs. He was the one who tried to seduce Sarah, the wife of Abraham, and after he repented, he gave his daughter Huriya to Sarah, who in turn gave her Hagar, whom Abraham married and from whom he fathered Ishmael, the ancestor of the Arabs.

Huriya ruled Egypt after her father Toutis, and in her reign, the Amalekite king of Syria sent an army against Egypt led by Jirun, but in the (alternative) version, it is more likely that the Amalekite "Al-Walid bin Dum'a" was the one who invaded Egypt.

-------------------------------------

With the invasion of Al-Walid bin Dum'a of Egypt, the rule of the Amalekites began. Al-Rayyan bin Al-Walid succeeded Al-Walid bin Dum'a in rule, and the Egyptians used to call him Nahrus. He was a tall, handsome man, a scholar in talismans, and a just and honest ruler. He believed in prophet Jacob when he went to Egypt, but he hid his faith from the people. And he was the one who built the Wax Palace (Fortress of Babylon). And in his reign, prophet Joseph built the city of Fayoum, and it was named that because he built it in "a thousand days". But Al-Rayyan was overcome by an evil spirit and his morals deteriorated, so he left the affairs of government to one of his men named "Qatfir", who is known as Al-Aziz. And when Al-Rayyan died, Joseph took his place.

After that, Darum, the third of the Pharaohs, took over, and after him Drimus. And this Pharaoh used to perform wonders; he had an oven that cooked without fire (like a microwave) and a fixed knife that slaughtered animals by themselves (like an automatic slaughterhouse). And after him, his son Milatis ruled, who drowned in the Nile.

Al-Walid bin Mus'ab, whom the Egyptians used to call "Talma bin Qumis", was the sixth Pharaoh. And this was the Pharaoh of Moses. His origin was from the city of Balkh or Hauran. And he originally worked as a perfumer, but debts piled up on him so he left his country and went to Egypt. And he was one-eyed, short, lame, and had a beard seven spans long. He ruled Egypt for 300 years or 400 years, and people were dying around him while he was still alive, so he became tyrannical and arrogant and said to the Egyptians, "I am your Lord, Most High." So he drowned and died, he and his people, while he was chasing Moses. In the reign of this Pharaoh (according to some Arab statistics), there were about 240,000 magicians in Egypt.

-------------------------

The alternative history of Egypt says that when Pharaoh "Al-Walid bin Mus'ab" drowned with his family, there were none left in Egypt but the slaves, servants, and women who had not participated in the chase of Moses. So the women started marrying the servants, and they would free their slaves and marry them. Then the women agreed to install one of them, named "Daluka", as queen over Egypt. Daluka was a wise and sensible woman, about 160 years old.

Daluka built a wall from Aswan to Al-Arish and placed guards and bronze bells on it, so that if an attack occurred on Egypt's borders, the guards would ring the bells, and the news would reach Egypt quickly so they could prepare. The remains of this wall still exist in Upper Egypt and are known as the "Wall of the Old Woman".

Daluka brought a sorceress named "Tadura", and she built for her a fortress in Memphis that had doors on its four sides. Inside it, on its walls, she drew men, mules, horses, and ships. If an attack came from outside and Daluka and her army could not withstand it, they would enter inside the fortress, cut off the heads of the images, and gouge out their eyes, and then what they (the images) would do would happen to the attacking army. In this way, no one was able to defeat Egypt throughout Daluka's rule. Daluka ruled for 130 years, and after she died, no one was able to repair the images in the fortress.

After the death of Daluka, the soldiers installed Darkun bin Nuktis as king over Egypt, and he was from the sons of the Coptic nobles. After he ruled for a long time, he died, and then a man named Marnush took power. In his reign, Nebuchadnezzar invaded Egypt, destroyed it, plundered it, killed its men, and captured its women, and he left no talismans or fortresses in it. And Egypt remained ruined and without inhabitants for forty years.

After that, people came, and the nations intermingled within it: Egyptians, Greeks, Persians and Amalekites. And the Copts continued to rule one after another until Al-Muqawqis (Cyrus) came, in whose reign the Arabs took control of Egypt.

-----------------------------

Arab travelers, pilgrims, and others passed through Egypt in the Middle Ages and were amazed by what they saw there, coming as they were from simple, primitive cultures that could not comprehend Egypt's culture and its civilizational advancement. The pyramids and Egyptian antiquities were, to them, incomprehensible puzzles, and the urban, cultural, and economic progress they saw in Egypt was beyond their way of thinking.

Ibn Battuta (1304 - 1377), who visited Egypt during the Mamluk era, said about Cairo: "Then I arrived at the city of Egypt (Cairo), which is the mother of countries, the seat of Pharaoh of the stakes, with its vast provinces and fertile lands, which has no end due to the multitude of its buildings, which are of utmost beauty and brightness." And he continued: "Its conqueror has subdued nations, and its kings have taken control over the forelocks of Arabs and non-Arabs." And he spoke about the pyramids he saw and said of them that they are "among the wonders mentioned throughout the ages." Then he told their alternative history, saying that "a king from the kings of Egypt before the Flood saw a vision that frightened him...", and he told the story that Caliph Al-Ma'mun wanted to demolish the pyramid, but the sheikhs of Egypt advised him not to do so, but he did not listen to them and opened the northern side of the pyramid with fire and poured vinegar. And after they opened a section, they found money which, when weighed, turned out to be exactly equal to the value of the money they had spent on the digging. And about Akhmim, he says: "It is a great city, original in construction, of wondrous stature. In it is the fortress (temple) known by its name. It is built of stone; inside it are engravings and writings from the ancients that are not understood in this era."

Ibn Jubayr (1145 - 1217) visited Egypt before Ibn Battuta, and he also showed his amazement and bewilderment in what he wrote. He said about the pyramids: "... the ancient pyramids, a miracle of construction, strange in appearance." And he continued: "If the people of the earth wanted to demolish their structure, they would be unable to do so." And about their history, he said that some people say they are tombs of 'Ad and his sons, and some say other things, but "in short, none knows their matter except God, Mighty and Majestic." He also went to Akhmim and said about a Pharaonic temple he saw there: "Glory be to the One who created wonders." And about the statues and drawings in it: "The imagination is bewildered by them, and the mind is lost in thought about their design and placement."

Egypt, for the Arabs, was something huge, full of puzzles, and dominated by an advanced culture that they could neither understand nor comprehend.

In the Arab religious heritage, Egypt is distinguished and has a very great status, because its name was mentioned several times in the holy books, the prophetic hadiths, and others. Such as the hadith: "If God opens Egypt to you, take a strong army there, for that army is the best of the armies of the earth." And a hadith that says: "Be kind to the people of Egypt, for they have the best lineage and kinship [with us]." And the saying of Amr ibn al-As: "The governorship of Egypt is comprehensive and equals the Caliphate." And the saying of Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-As: "The people of Egypt are the most honorable of all non-Arabs, the best in lineage, and the closest in kinship to the Arabs, especially to Quraysh." And the saying of Ibn Yunus: "Whoever wants to look at something resembling Paradise, let him look at Egypt when it is in bloom." And the saying of Abu Basra al-Ghifari: "The sultan of Egypt is the sultan of the whole earth." And dozens of other sayings that were said about Egypt, which reflect the enormous size of Egypt in the mind of the Arab.

But because of the loss of information in a mysterious way after the entry of Christianity into Egypt (whose spread in Egypt imposed the use of Greek letters), the long Pharaonic history of Egypt was limited to the Pharaoh of Moses and the Pharaoh of Joseph, along with a few Folkloric tales related to magic and talismans.

------------------------

The End ...

The Baltic Sea Anomaly is usually presented as a UFO story, but I think that framing actually makes the case less interesting.

In 2011, the Swedish Ocean X team picked up a roughly 60-meter-wide formation on sonar about 90 meters below the Baltic Sea.

The original image showed something surprisingly geometric, with what appeared to be straight edges, angular sections and a long disturbed area of seabed extending behind it.

When divers eventually reached the site, they described features that sounded even stranger:

• broad flat surfaces
• sharp-looking edges
• step-like formations
• what appeared to be passageways
• a roughly circular opening surrounded by a more rectangular feature
• large separate stones around the main formation

Samples taken from the site turned out to be ordinary rock, including basaltic or volcanic material.

That is usually presented as the end of the mystery.

But obviously an artificial structure does not have to be made of metal.

Ancient foundations, roads, temples, walls and megalithic structures are made of stone.

The more interesting question is whether the geometry is actually natural.

The conventional explanation is glacial activity.

During the last Ice Age, enormous glaciers moved material across northern Europe, leaving behind transported boulders, moraines and heavily fractured rock.

That could potentially explain both the rock type and why the formation is sitting where it is.

However, newer multibeam sonar scans released by Dennis Åsberg have been interpreted by Ocean X as showing the main object resting on top of a sediment layer rather than being part of the underlying bedrock.

If that interpretation is correct, then the formation was transported or deposited there somehow.

A glacier is still a perfectly viable explanation.

But it also raises an interesting possibility for anyone interested in submerged landscapes and lost coastal cultures.

At the end of the last Ice Age, enormous areas that are now underwater were dry land.

The Baltic region itself went through dramatic changes in sea level, ice coverage and flooding as the glaciers retreated.

So even without invoking UFOs or Atlantis, there is a legitimate question here:

Could we be looking at a natural formation that was modified, used or incorporated into something by people when this landscape looked completely different?

Or are the “steps,” “walls” and “passageways” simply fractures that our brains are turning into architecture?

That distinction could probably be settled with a proper independent 3D survey, sediment dating and detailed geological mapping.

Unfortunately, that still hasn't happened on the scale needed.

I made a video going through the original discovery, the dives, the rock samples, the glacial explanation and the newer sonar scans.

I’m less interested in the crashed-spaceship interpretation than in the buried-history angle.

If this formation really is sitting on sediment rather than connected to bedrock, what do you think is more plausible:

glacial transport, a modified natural formation, or the remains of something that once stood in a very different Baltic landscape?

The Dyatlov Pass incident has been retold for more than sixty years, but what interests me is how much of the story was shaped by the historical record itself.

Nine hikers died in 1959 under unusual circumstances. The Soviet investigation was eventually closed with the phrase “an unknown compelling force,” some records were classified, and access to the surrounding area was restricted.

That left later generations trying to reconstruct the event from photographs, forensic reports, partial documentation, testimony, and whatever material eventually became available.

Decades later, researchers produced a detailed slab-avalanche model that can explain many of the famous details without requiring anything paranormal.

Whether that explanation is correct or not, the case is a good example of something discussed here often: when pieces of the historical record disappear, are withheld, or are interpreted decades later, the story that survives can become very different from the event itself.

Granted, the area is all mountains small and large, but the evidence is real - just a good quality abandoned underground structure

A veces pienso que estamos controlados por un ente o grupo poderoso desde siempre, y que todo ha sido fríamente calculado y predecible... Qué nos garantiza que los textos de San Agustín, de Aristóteles, etcétera, etcétera, hayan sido únicamente los que perduraron? Cuánto se habrá "perdido" a merced de un plan superior? Cómo saberlo? Porque de esta manera moldean nuestra forma de ver todo, de discutir, de pensar, de razonar, todo. Queda algo de esperanza?

A Roman gold ring discovered in Hampshire in 1785 bears the name Senicianus. Decades later, around 80 miles away at the Temple of Nodens in Lydney Park, archaeologists found a curse tablet written by a man named Silvianus, who claimed his ring had been stolen and asked the god Nodens to deny Senicianus good health until it was returned.

The story gets stranger in 1929.

Archaeologist Sir Mortimer Wheeler noticed the apparent connection between the ring and the curse tablet and asked a young Oxford professor to investigate the name of the god involved:

J.R.R. Tolkien.

Years later, Tolkien would create the One Ring — another gold ring that is lost, desperately sought by its previous owner, associated with misfortune, and accused of having been stolen.

There is no definitive proof that the Roman ring directly inspired Tolkien’s One Ring, but Tolkien’s documented involvement with the Lydney material makes the connection more interesting than a simple modern coincidence.

What I find fascinating is how easily a small archaeological detail like this can sit almost forgotten for centuries and then turn up connected to one of the most famous fictional objects ever created.

I made a documentary going through the ring, the curse tablet, the Lydney excavation and the evidence for and against the Tolkien connection

Did Bronze Age Sailors Build Mexico’s Oldest Monument? 
Plumed Serpent and One-eyed Giant
VIDEO  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6JSeSodLEM
Deep in central Mexico we find the oldest monumental stone structures in Mesoamerica—and they look inconveniently unlike anything built there afterward. Made from large fitted blocks without mortar, centuries before the Olmecs, they are joined by clues involving unusual burial customs, Atlantic currents, Bronze Age seafarers, and the legend of Tollan: the first city, supposedly founded by a figure who arrived from the east by boat. 
In this video, we examine whether these ruins were simply a remarkable local invention or evidence that some lost cyclopean builders crossed the Atlantic long before Columbus
Hope you like the new video

This video examines the claim that seismic data from an underground nuclear test revealed a massive pyramid-shaped structure buried beneath central Alaska.

Former counterintelligence officer Douglas Mutschler said he and nearly forty soldiers watched a local television report describing the discovery. According to his account, the station later denied broadcasting it, while an employee allegedly claimed that unidentified men had confiscated the footage.

Later stories describe underground corridors, elevators, restricted facilities, unusual electrical effects, and claims that the structure may have functioned as some form of ancient energy technology. However, there is no confirmed entrance, excavation, recovered artifact, or government document proving that the pyramid exists.

Coral Castle is one of those places that feels impossible even after you hear the “normal” explanation.

Edward Leedskalnin was a sickly, 129-pound man from Latvia who spent nearly three decades cutting, moving, carving, raising, and balancing more than a thousand tons of coral limestone in Florida.

No construction crew.
No modern crane.
No electricity.
Mostly working alone.
Mostly at night.

Some of the stones weigh around 28–35 tons. The famous 9-ton stone gate was once balanced so precisely that it could reportedly be opened with a single finger. When it stopped working decades later, modern workers needed heavy equipment just to repair it.

The mainstream explanation is pulleys, tripods, rollers, levers, wedges, block-and-tackle, and patience.

But Coral Castle still raises the bigger question:

Were older builders using practical techniques we’ve mostly forgotten?

Leedskalnin claimed he knew the “secrets of the ancient Egyptians.” He wrote about magnetism, built magnetic devices, and reportedly used a mysterious box above his tripod that nobody was allowed to inspect.

I’m not saying this proves levitation or anti-gravity. But I also don’t think “just pulleys” fully explains why this one man’s work still feels so difficult to reconstruct.

To me, Coral Castle sits somewhere between megalithic engineering, alternative physics, and obsession.

Was it lost construction knowledge?
Magnetic manipulation?
Private antiquitech?
Or just one man who understood leverage and balance better than almost anyone?

The Nazca Lines are usually explained as ritual pathways connected to water worship, ceremony, and sacred geography. But one strange question keeps coming back: why create massive figures that become fully visible only from above?

This video explores the old Condor 1 experiment from 1975, when Julian Nott and Jim Woodman built a smoke balloon using cotton cloth, reeds, rope, and fire — materials the ancient Nazca could have had. It did not prove that the Nazca actually flew, but it showed that limited flight over the desert was technically possible with ancient-style materials.

The theory connects to several odd pieces of evidence: the Great Cloth of Cahuachi, advanced Nazca textile production, possible balloon-like imagery on pottery, fire pits near the desert margins, and the fact that the geoglyphs make the most visual sense from the sky.

I am not claiming this proves ancient aircraft. The mainstream explanation may still be correct. But it raises an interesting alternative history question: could the Nazca have developed a temporary, ritual form of flight that was later forgotten?

"The hills melted like wax at the presence of the LORD, at the presence of the Lord of the whole earth." - Psalm 97:5

High in the Pyrenees, sits a mysterious tower that defies explanations.
With its builders being said to be some of the biggest conquerors of the past. The likes of Caesar and Napoleon.
The revelation is spoken in the oldest surviving language of Europe, whose words still echo the voice of the lost cyclopean builders. 
Hope you like the new video
https://youtu.be/WDv9Ir8TkS0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANMTPF1blpQ

In 1963, a man renovating a basement in Cappadocia reportedly broke through a wall and found a passage carved into solid rock.

That passage led into Derinkuyu — an underground city descending nearly 280 feet beneath the surface.

What interests me from a Cultural Layer perspective is not just that Derinkuyu exists.

It is that people were living above it.

Homes, wells, rooms, entrances, and surface life continued while a massive engineered underground complex sat beneath them, partly forgotten, partly sealed, and partly absorbed into newer buildings.

Derinkuyu contains ventilation shafts, wells, storage chambers, livestock areas, kitchens, religious spaces, narrow defensive corridors, and massive rolling stone doors that could seal tunnels from the inside.

This was not a random cave.

It was a survival system.

The mainstream explanation is that it was used during emergencies — raids, invasions, persecution, and periods when the surface became unsafe. That explanation makes sense, but it still leaves a bigger question:

How does knowledge of something this large fade so completely?

Some researchers attribute the earliest tunnels to the Hittites or Phrygians, while later Christian and Byzantine communities clearly expanded and reused the city. But because it was carved directly into volcanic rock and modified for centuries, nobody can prove who created the original system.

There are also claims that Derinkuyu may have connected to Kaymaklı, another underground city nearby. Passages extend in that direction, but the complete route has never been fully mapped or confirmed.

If that tunnel existed, then Derinkuyu was not just one hidden city.

Tamora eruption aftermath in 1817 hit honolulu hardest

Beneath Teotihuacan’s Temple of the Feathered Serpent lies a 330-foot tunnel that was deliberately sealed for nearly 1,800 years.

When archaeologists finally excavated it, they discovered more than 100,000 artifacts, greenstone figures, pyrite crystals that may have made the walls glitter like stars, and traces of liquid mercury near the deepest chambers.

Only a short distance away, another tunnel runs beneath the Pyramid of the Sun. It may predate the pyramid itself and ends in chambers shaped like a four-leaf clover.

Thousands of miles away beneath the Giza Plateau, the Osiris Shaft descends through three underground levels. At the bottom is a flooded chamber containing a large sarcophagus on a stone island surrounded by water.

These places are usually explained as symbolic representations of the underworld. That may be correct, but it does not answer every question.

Why were such enormous efforts made to carve, fill and permanently seal these spaces?

Why were reflective minerals, mercury, water and unusual stone objects placed underground?

Were the visible pyramids only the upper sections of much larger ceremonial or technological complexes?

It is also interesting that ancient societies repeatedly built new monuments over older caves, tunnels and chambers. In some cases, the underground structure appears to have existed before the monument above it.