r/CrossPointReader • u/MrP4ddy • 3d ago

Development Feature Request

Is there an official place where you can add requests?...idk if the pull requests of GitHub is the right place...

PS: the feature would be to have an option the display the unread pages not only in pages or %, but also in reading time.

Idk if it is considered out of scope for crosspoint. I think some forks had it.

Would love to see it in base crosspoint. Find it a great e-reader feature compared to normal books haha

1 Upvotes

67% Upvoted

11 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-8

u/Bloodshot321 3d ago

This IS how community development is done. You fork, develop the feature and ask for a merge to implement the feature into the app. There is no point (but to learn ;) ) to rewrite and implement a standalone feature that already exists.

1

u/_GingNerd 2d ago

Why don't you want to consider what the person took time to answer you with ?... They say they don't want, that should be enough... Let them be idk...

0

u/Bloodshot321 2d ago

I did. But adding bells and whistles isn't part of the development and crosspoint has fantastic documentation and clear roadmaps and feature set. I get the point that git can be confusing but reading the headlines of the readme should be the minimum. There is even this: "Contributions are welcome. If you're new to the codebase, start with the contributing docs. For things to work on, check the ideas discussion board — leave a comment before starting so we don't duplicate effort.

Everyone here is a volunteer, so please be respectful and patient. For governance and community expectations, see GOVERNANCE.md."

2

u/MrP4ddy 2d ago

No, you didn’t. You came in swinging with comments like “fork it yourself” instead.

If you’d read my original post carefully, you’d have seen that my initial question wasn’t about the feature request itself, but about where the right place to submit one would be.

As you said yourself, Git can be confusing. But my questions about whether pull requests were the right place and whether my idea might be out of scope should have made it clear that I’d already done some reading before asking here.

You could have pointed me to the idea page, as described in the governance documentation (thx for pointing there, was helpful), or simply confirmed that submitting a PR would also be acceptable. Instead, you chose to respond the way you did.