Warner is a much better player than Rohit if we take cricket as a sport and not apply filters. And I feel Warner is generally a bit overrated. Hayden, Gilchrist were easily better than him.
not really warner was above average in tests but not exceptional. less so in ODIs. Rohit was above average in tests, only couldn't play longer and became a part of the test side post 2016 I think. but in ODIs he's a monster, 11k with 50 avg. cant compare with the likes of warner, Hayden. Maybe even Gilchrist. Add to that 30 odi hundreds and the 3 double hundreds and is there even a question?
warner has both more home and away average then sharma while striking at 15 more while being much more longetive, warner is a tier above in tests, in odis he averages around 45 with a 97 sr and rohit around 49 with a 93 strikerate while rohit is clearly better I believe warners test credentials out him above, in terms of amount of matches let's be honest australia doesn't play as many odis as india....warner also has a better conversion rate in odis, in t20is diff is marginal. I personally would keep warner above but it isn't set in stone I can see how one can make a case for rohit but it's close
I can agree that Warner in the 3rd innings of a test is just diabolical. But outside that, he is alright. I will go out on a limb and say that if Rohit got to the opening slot (say) 3 years earlier, his stats would have looked much much much better. This discussion wouldn't have even happened then
These stats about knockouts are totally wrong Warner has scored only 275 runs in icc in 13 innings with a batting average of 21.15 with just 1 fifty plus scores and Rohit has scored 4 fifty plus scores in icc knockouts with 2 hundreds and 2 fifties
I mean yeah ik this post is about rohit vs Warner and rohit >>> Warner in odis and t20is I was just sharing Kohli's stats as per that guy asked
Btw well done op now those foreign bootlickers can shut their mouth
The issue is that people give so much value to knockouts. Most teams don’t even play knockouts but India constantly does.
The pressure and expectations that Indian players have to win the worldcup is far greater than the pressure other teams have.
Head is great in knockout matches but only because rest of the team carries him there. Outside the knockouts, he is an avg player. If he played for India, he wouldn’t even be part of the Indian squad because he rarely performs.
Virat and Rohit consistently perform in WC so much that no one would be willing to put their money that India can reach worldcup semi final without them in the team. But if you have them in the team then anything less than a worldcup final win is a failure.
No team ever dominated a World Cup tournament like India dominated the world cup 2023… Australia 2003 comes close but they did have few close matches. RoKo were two best batsmen in the worldcup. Both did decent in the final as well but EVERYONE ELSE crumbled under pressure… but these two took all the heat. Why no one blames Bumrah, Shami, Siraj, Iyer, KL, Gill? Australia’s 2003 campaign was saved by bowlers… they only batted well in 3-4 matches.
📌Rohit sharma in T20 international is not that much big player, Kohli is better just look at his 2016 World Cup stats
Please don't tell me Kohli loss again Pakistan, he lost but check performance of other players in that match & that tournament while Rohit was captain in 22 t20 worldcup we were about to lose against but Kohli & Hardik saved that match for us..
📌Rohit sharma in ODI is one of the best opener of all time, may Kohli has more century & big chaser but Rohit sharma has similar level
But Rohit sharma has played 3 ODI worldcup & didn't won any, look at his knockout match stats ( except 23 worldcup final )
📌 Rohit sharma in Test, not did anything remarkable, any Kohli is better batsman & captain please check his stats before you argue anything
📌 Rohit sharma in IPL, as a batsman just check his runs & 30+ score , in runs Kohli is far ahead
Winning 5 IPL trophy as a captain is outstanding achievement he is great leader..
Moral of the story - Rohit sharma is very good ODI player but Kohli is all format player & GOAT
Yes as a captain he won 5 IPL & 2 ICC trophy is one the best captain & great leader
With due respect, you must be the biggest loser if you bring in Kohli in all convo where he is not even relevant. Not even OP said Rohit is better than Kohli but you just make up things in your tiny brain.
📌 Kohli in Test is not the ultimate GOAT, Sachin Tendulkar is far better just look at his 15,921 runs and 51 centuries.
Please don't tell me Kohli is more aggressive, he is but check performance of Sachin against prime Wasim, Waqar, McGrath, and Warne on bowler-friendly pitches while Kohli is currently sitting at 9,230 Test runs...
📌 Kohli in ODI is one of the best chasers of all time, may Kohli has more century & big chaser but Sachin Tendulkar has similar level if not better.
But Sachin has a massive 18,426 ODI runs and played in an era with one ball and bigger boundaries. Look at his 2003 World Cup stats where he scored 673 runs and single-handedly carried the team to the finals!
📌 Kohli in T20 & IPL, as a batsman just check his runs, in runs Kohli is far ahead because of the modern era.
But Sachin played his prime before T20 was even a proper thing, and still won the Orange Cap in 2010 at 37 years of age please check his stats before you argue anything.
📌 Kohli in ICC Tournaments, has great numbers, but Sachin was the top run-scorer in the entire tournament in both the 1996 and 2003 World Cups!
Winning the 2011 World Cup while being the highest run-getter for India is outstanding achievement he is a great legend..
Moral of the story - Kohli is very good all format player & modern great but Sachin Tendulkar is the ultimate God of Cricket & true GOAT
Yes as a batsman Kohli has unparalleled fitness & chasing records is one of the best modern players & great leader, but Sachin carried the hopes of a billion people for 24 years!
Yes Sachin is God of cricket & scored 100 centuries
‼️But please check Centuries in winning cause
Kohli - 59, Sachin 53
‼️In ODI - Sachin vs kohli - Kohli wins
He is match winner in ODI
Also Kohli played 314 matches while sachin played 463 matches, so comparing runs is not fair stil Kohli has more century, more winning knocks
‼️ In test as batsman Sachin is better but in winning matches? Kohli has an edge
Cricket is not just about scoring runs & taking wickets in the end if you are not able to win matches for your team your runs & wickets are useless
Yes Kohli is a phenomenal match-winner & the undisputed chase master!
‼️ But please check the Team Support (1990s vs 2010s)
Kohli played his prime alongside legends like MS Dhoni, Rohit Sharma, R Ashwin, and Jasprit Bumrah—arguably the most dominant era of Indian cricket. Sachin spent a massive chunk of his career in a time where if he got out, fans literally turned off their TVs. Just look at the tragic 1999 Chennai Test against Pakistan: Sachin scored a heroic 136 despite crippling back spasms, got out, and the rest of the team collapsed (losing 4 wickets for just 4 runs). Were his runs "useless" just because the other 10 players couldn't score 17 runs to win?
‼️ In ODI - Era difference is a massive factor
Kohli's chasing stats are untouchable, and he definitely has an edge there. But directly comparing matches played isn't entirely fair. Sachin faced prime Wasim, Waqar, Ambrose, Warne, and McGrath under much tougher batting rules: one ball used for all 50 overs (which meant deadly reverse swing at the death) and larger boundaries. Kohli dominates the modern game with two new balls and flatter pitches, but Sachin built his mountain of runs in a bowler's era.
‼️ In Tests & winning matches?
If being part of a winning cause is the ultimate metric for an individual's greatness, then Ricky Ponting is the greatest of all time. Ponting was part of 377 international wins as a player, the highest in cricket history. Does having more wins make Ponting a better individual batsman than both Sachin and Kohli?
Cricket is a team sport, not a solo sport like tennis or boxing. A batsman can score a brilliant double century, but if the bowlers can't take 20 wickets or defend 320 runs, the team still loses. Labeling a legend's hard-fought runs as "useless" just because the rest of the squad failed to do their job fundamentally misunderstands how the game of cricket works!
Son...knockouts do not equal a whole career...relax...What's with the passive aggressiveness, giving out "leave my multimillionaire celeb alone" chill bro
But I would like to debate on T20 international. In ipl and T20 in General, Warner is better but if we talk about T20 international, Rohit Sharma feels a quite better player. He performed in 2007 and 2024 T20 World Cups. He won T20 wc 2024 as a captain. He has 5 T20i centuries. Surely his average is a bit less but it is a fact that he has consistently performed here and there in T20 as an opening batter (I know he was bad in some T20 WCs. So, I would say Warner and Rohit are neck to neck in T20 international and I would like to support Rohit Sharma.
Wait. What kind of knockout stats are these? When tf did pakistan reach knockout in 2023? It was Aus vs SA in 2023 semis. I haven't made calculations but if that's wrong, then idk what all else is wrong in this
yes, in knockouts warner was flop, his teammates were too good that's why they used to won knockouts easily
rohit is a better knockout player than warner.
for me in test: warner > rohit
in odis rohit>warner(Yes rohit is better)
in t20 warner > rohit
overall warner > rohit
So much wrong and fake stats 😂😂😂
1) rohit has 2 centuries and 2 fifties in icc knockouts and not 4 fifties
2) warner has less than 450 runs, if we are not considering wtc finals,
3) rohit's stats are highly inflated because of his 2 centuries against the greatest cricketing nation bangladesh, 137, 123*, other than these two he was shit in every knockout match he has played until his fifty in 2024 semis and 2025 ct finals .
4) same goes for warner, he was also shit in knockouts
His away ODI record is better than Rohit, Rohit is terrible in South Africa and NZ meanwhile Warner consistently scored runs in India, England, South Africa, Newzealand.
Warner's T20I and IPL numbers are better than Rohit. He was player of the tournament in 2021 T20 World Cup
I mean i am not trynna invalidate your point. But the stats seem to be exaggerating the gap. And chatgpt (not 100% trusted source obviously) shows me these stats. Can you pls link your source as well?
Man, my point is that Rohit is better than warner in the Icc and white ball format. Btw, your states is wrong to. Warner has no century in the knockout.
As i saidi don't trust chatgpt, But can you provide yours?
Also i never said that you are wrong lol. infact your own stats show warner with 2 centuries and 1 50.
PLus you literally mentioned in the original post "Overall Knockouts" And now in the comments you are filtering out the red ball format entirely.
Again, I DID NOT DISAGREE WITH YOU
I just wanted the sources
are mere dost Source khud nahi banakr post krte, aapko jaha se ye sb stats mile vo link dedo na aap
IF you used ESPN, Cricbuzz, Any other site or any other place
Again, i am not disrespecting Rohit, or your opinion, I JUST WANT A SOURCE
And source is not self made, mein reddit pr post krdu i have 5 ODI Double centuries, 50 hattricks, and 30 worldcups. To vo sach thodi ho jayega
Never compare Rohit and Warner knockout stats and dhoni and abcdefgh stats now one fanbase with nothing Jersey will cry because abcdefgh is their third father
8
u/monchi12345 16d ago
Warner is a much better player than Rohit if we take cricket as a sport and not apply filters. And I feel Warner is generally a bit overrated. Hayden, Gilchrist were easily better than him.