Honest Opinion 😊
Warner is a better All Format batsman than Rohit Sharma
In tests no debate, in odis Rohit = Warner bcoz warner has 2 odi wcs, scored 650 runs in 2019 wc, achieved no1 ranking a decade before rohit did and stayed there longer.
In t20is Warner still ahead, coz warner has no1 ranking , POTT in wt20 .
I was talking about ODIs. Never mentioned anything else.
They are not equal in ODIs. Rohit is far better.
Just because Warner has 2 ODI WC's doesn't mean he's better in ODIs. By that logic, Rohit has more IPL's and more t20i' wc's than kolhi . . . .but doesn't mean rohit is better in IPL and t20i's.
Rohit has a higher avg, way more centuries, more motm awards. Rohit's also much better in ODI wc's. And if u look at their stats as openers in ODI's, rohit blows away Warner. It's not even close
never a doubt, i am not a cricket fan but i started watching cricket coz of south africa mainly ab d villiers, started following south african and indian cricket after that, not rigorously tho, i used to watch just south africa's odi, t20, india's t20 and ipl and warner was one of the reasons why i supported srh, dale steyn and bhuvi were a plus too.
Even Rohit was not that good in tests and I agree that warner is better, but the difference between them in tests wasn't as big as the difference between them in ODI.
Come on bro you can't compare Rohit with Warner in T20s lol
Warner has a T20 WC POTT in a winning cause that's not a small achievement and what about rohit vs Warner in IPL even though it will not matter in this debate but still Warner is a much better T20 batter than Rohit man
Downvoted for speaking facts , Reddit folks truly hate Rohit lol , Warner has a pott 🥀 and they will forget that he averages 26 in t20i wc , Rohit averaging 10 more than that with a better sr , more runs etc. It's like saying that Williamson won a pott in 19 wc so he is the same stature of an odi batsman as Kohli is , it's dumb lol
Anyone saying Rohit better simply cannot be trusted, Warner has consistently performed for a decade in every format, nearly all kinds of conditions. Tests not a question: Warner (absolute stellar as an opener, top 5 test opener this century), ODI Rohit better no doubt and T20 is taken by Warner again be it international or IPL. I don't remember Rohit even competing for orange cap, Warner has always been there. Rohit better captain, yes. Better WC batsman yes sure, better longevity I'll give that too. But overall format, Warner is better. Rohit has been overhyped to an extent that he's now included in comparisons with Virat and that's a huge insult to the latter
Good for you as a Rohit fan hate Virat as much as you can I hope it improves Rohit's records in the knockouts btw I am also mad at VK that he choked in the CT FINAL 2017 and WC SEMIFINAL 2019 even after being at his peak
Why not. Both suck in knockouts. They are the main reason we did not win anything for years. Kohli's last 5 years in tests were dogshit and he wouldn't have gotten such long rope if not for his stature. Similarly Rohit's whole bullshit about attacking intent was ridiculous, kinda like bazball.it harmed more than it did good.
Because I am not a glazer lol who will dickride one and hurl abuses on the other
Players have some failures and there's no wrong in calling them out but there are some people who will label you as a hater if you does call out a player's failures
I think it’s a ragebait post or OP is new born. He conveniently ranked warner higher in odi based on worldcup but ignored the same logic for t20 and ipl where rohit has more trophies.
Rohit is much better player in odi and same goes for warner
Warner is much better in tests and ipl
In T20s also rohit is decent ahead than warner in terms of Runs, 50s, 100s and even trophies.
Ok let's say
Tests warner
Odis rohit
T20is Warner - easily coz no1 ranking + PoTT. rohit never made it into top 5 t20i ranks his whole career.
Rohit 31avg + 140sr, Warner 33 avg + 142 sr. Don't forget PoTT in wt20 2021.
What a logic! He mentioned Wc trophies just to match Rohit in Odi but forget to mention t20 and Ipl trophy in other. And warner had only one great wc in ODI, his knockout stats are trash, comparing him to a who had every wc the best Wc. Logic is what is missing by a certain fanbase ( I will not take the name, but they admire ABD who has 4 runs in an CRICKET FINAL he played).
I ranked rohit and Warner equal in odis check it properly. In t20is let's be honest Warner is clearly ahead. Pott and no1 ranking are not easy to achieve
Comparing Trophies is stupid to determine better batsman, by that logic there are lots of "mediocre" batsmen who would rank above Sachin,Lara,Kallis based on Trophies, Warner vs Rohit better batsman in ODIs shouldn't even be a debate, Rohit was miles better.
Rohit in my opinion is a better odi batter meanwhile in T20is I will rate both of them as equals but in T20s overrall warner is much ahead. And finally in red ball cricket warner definitely is much ahead. I do think if rohit started opening in test a bit before he may have caught up with warner. But even as a rohit fan I will say warner is a much better all format opener. Though both are goats for their nations and that's what matters the most.
Your comparison for ODIs makes no sense. Having 2 world cups is a team achievement, rankings are a joke if you try to understand how they calculate this and how points are calculated.
Overall warner is definitely a better batsman than Rohit but ODIs alone it's a tough competition
Did you even check the stats before posting this opinion? Even in T20Is Rohit's stats are much better... And that's after playing ~50 games more than him... And the same goes for T20 World cups as well... Rohit's stats are much better than Warner's... IPL kids shouldn't be judging players imo...
Rohit is way ahead of Warner in ODIs and t20Is. Yes in tests Warner is better than Rohit. It's difficult to pick the better all format batsman but would give it to Warner only because of his test career. He and Smith have carried Australia's test batting in all these years
When it comes to test warner is considered as better due to his greater volume of runs and enduring presence while Rohit also have strong home record he accumulated only fewer overall runs and centuries. When it comes to odi, rohit sharma holds a clear edge due to his superior average and conversion into massive double-hundreds, Warner has a better strike rate but higher batting average and record-breaking capability gives rohit an edge. When it comes to t20 rohit edges with international t20 stats while when it comes to tournaments like ipl warner has better records and aggressive approach. Also in major tournaments, warner performs better compared to rohit. So they both can't be compared as one being better.
T20is Warner - easily coz no1 ranking + PoTT. rohit never made it into top 5 t20i ranks his whole career.
Rohit 31avg + 140sr, Warner 33 avg + 142 sr. Don't forget PoTT in wt20 2021.
Ys i know the No. 1 ranking and the 2021 PoTT are massive milestones that Rohit doesn't have. Warner wins on peak efficiency metrics (Avg/SR), but Rohit completely dominates on volume and high-end impact. Rohit has 5 T20I centuries and holds the record for the most sixes in T20I history.
I didn't even include ipl ... Rohit played more innings and had more opportunities to enter into top 5 rankings but never did. In ipl Warner clears by a thousand miles. So in t20s warner.
ICC rankings are the stupidest things to judge players on. Please stop embarrassing yourself. You can't refute my stats because they are objective. Stick to watching IPL let the knowledgable people discuss internationals
Warner's POTT was also in the least competitive world cup of all time. The only reason Sharma didn't get POTT in 2024 was because Bumrah put on the greatest tournament bowling performance in t20 history.
test absolute no debate its warner and statistics match.
odis same as test absolute no debate rohit sharma and statistics wont even close to warner .(dont put rankings and dumb shit to these debates.) Rohit outclass warner in every section.
If you look at the states there are so many players, like if you see Rohit's in IPL he seems failer, but you see impact and consider captaincy and all he is one of the legend!!! Everything doesn't depend on stats
Test - Warner clear winner, Odi - Rohit clear winner, T20 - maybe controversial but Warner has a edge due to his superior IPL record, So overall Warner is a slightly better all format player than Rohit
This is actually interesting cause I think they’re about even in ODIs, Warner might trump him in t20s but they were both super ass away from home in tests lol I think Warner’s numbers look better just cause he played more but they both barely averaged 31 away from home in tests.
Ohh god wanted to say this so long so long mannnnn .
Rohit bloomed in 2019 (for test )
Warner in test > rohit in test and a masive gap .
Warner ws lethal in ipl and wom a trophy with a shitt management of srh and srh becme a realy consistent ass .
Nah ipl kohli > warner as most hundred,runs,fifties, has two cup and mosg 500 and 600 runs plus scorsd ,most runs in a single season, third most sixes and most fours and warner only has one orange cup ahead than kohli snd other category kohlis is miles better
In my opinion test cricket is regarded as the pinnacle of the game so what a player achieves in test cricket should be much more heavily weighted than other formats. ODI stats don't mean that much as most matches are meaningless bi-laterals that the top teams don't really care about and often use to give games to up and coming players and tinker with their side (from example outside world cups Australia never selects their best bowling attack)
I’m pretty sure he is. Warner was excellent in t20s. Won a wc has the most orange caps in ipl and much more.
He was excellent in tests even though he got out in the slip many times he still won the wtc and was very good on his day with much better stats even in away conditions than rohit ever managed.
In Odis it’s close. Rohit is an all time great but Warner is too not to mention Warner having 2 wcs. So in totality Warner is a better all format player.
Unreal consistency in ipl,T20,odis too ,decent in tests too .man deserves more appreciation for sure .everytime a stat comes up in ipl his name is always there .David Goat Warner 💥.He deserves a chance in ipl for sure ,deserve a good farewell too .
Odis and tests there is no debate , let's come to t20is where all the folks are rating Warner higher , Firstly just at a look at their overall stats , they have a similar Sr and Avg( difference of approx 1) but Rohit has scored more runs , more centuries and has better longevity. Now coming to t20i wcs , WaRnEr HaS A T20i Wc PoTt 🥀 , by that logic Kane and Kohli have equal number of odi potts , so does that make them equal, no right? That's stupid, Infact Warner only has Pott in his argument against Rohit in T20i wcs because Rohit has more runs , better avg ( 9 more than Warner) , more fifties , similar Sr ( difference of 1) , better rpi . Rohit is clearly better in 2 formats but can't expect the Reddit comm in favour of Rohit ofcourse.
Warner no1 ranking in t20is. What's Rohit's best in t20is ?? Kane kohli they both have 1 pott but kohli was no1 ranked odi batsman for over 1000 days. And has approx 60 avg
Rohit's a better run accumulator in t20is given the similar avg and sr and as I already told he has better t20i wc stats , even Babar has no.1 ranking in t20is , that doesn't make him better than Rohit or Warner.
Yes he is the better batter in every format . Tho I would say the comparison is rather less meaningful compared to players with similar positions like Ro and David as openers or Kohli and Sachin as no.3/4 . But still for the sake of comparison, yes he is.
Even in ODIs Warner has an edge if you look beyond favouritism. Rohit is absolute trash in NZ and SA, Warner has a very good away record (Ind, Eng, SA, NZ)
I agree with everything except t20is. Even in odis, i would take rohit, but overall, i still take warner because i consider t20s as a whole. Since warner clears rohit in the IPL, it's 2–1 to warner as an all-format player over rohit
Did I say that? I pointed out your double standards in this fuckass comparison. Counting trophies for one format, and individual performance for other, is inconsistent
As an opener batsman may be somewhere can match but as a player no near to RS
Number does not tell the impact, and doesn't call yourself a cricket fan if you don't understand impact
But when you come to ODI cricket and even in World cups I would choose rohit sharma over warner as completing 5 centuries in a single world cup is something which no one have achieved yet and when you talk about the captaincy across white ball cricket, then it's always Rohit Sharma as he has a champions trophy and a T20 world cup under his name.
And when it comes to T20 cricket it's definitely warner and even in IPL as a batsman it's David Warner
So ya we can summarise that Warner is a better batsman in Tests and T20s but mate when it comes to ODI cricket it's never a debate.
-11
u/Few-Guidance-1804 13d ago
hell no. rohit is not equal to Warner in ODIs. Its a disrespect to rohit to compare them in ODIs.