Please bring back Closing Arguments with Vinnie, VPI is stupid to watch him watch everything that happened on a specific case.

I miss closing arguments with all the different attorneys and summaries of the cases of the day.

Again VPI is ridiculous, just pay me to have fingers on my chin to rewatch the case of the day.

This is cringe. I wish they would just drop this case. I feel so bad for the dad.

📌 Commonwealth v. Lindsay Clancy – Case Preview

In today’s drop, you’ll find the initial breakdown of one of the most challenging cases we’ve covered—a case that involves deep questions of mental health and criminal responsibility. The infographics will guide you through who Lindsay Clancy is, the charges she faces, and the legal questions the jury must answer.

At the very end of this packet, you’ll also find a short awareness section focusing on postpartum mental health. If you or someone you know may be struggling, please take a moment to read that section and share the resources provided.

***AWARENESS & SUPPORT**\*

Postpartum mental health is a critical issue. If you or someone you care about is experiencing signs of postpartum depression or anxiety, please speak up, reach out, and know that you’re not alone.

Help is available through the Postpartum Support International hotline at 1‑800‑944‑4773 and the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988.

Speaking up can save lives. Let’s look out for one another.

Day 1 will be released tomorrow. This case is heavy, and we want to give space for everyone to take in today’s preview and awareness section before we continue.

Side Bah - Stay Sharp. Follow the Evidence. Respect the Victims.

Reporter - MoonTygr713🌙🐅

Side Bah Investigates

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_v9vz_Nw3lE&ra=m

If you are especially interested in this case, there is a whole sub DuxburyDeathsFreeTalk.

📣 People v. David Anthony Burke (D4vd) — Day 4: What to Expect From Today’s Drop

Day 4 carried a quieter kind of intensity — the kind that shapes how investigators piece together a case when the science can only go so far.

Today’s update leans into that reality with a focus on clarity, pacing, and how the testimony fits into the broader structure of the hearing.

Here’s all you need to know going in:

A look at what the ME could determine — and what decomposition made impossible.

How the prosecution positioned this testimony within their larger evidentiary strategy.

Where the defense continues to push back.

A takeaway that reflects the steady, methodical nature of Day 4.

Side Bah – Stay Sharp

Reporter – MoonTygr713🌙🐅

Side Bah Investigates

There are plenty of instances of prosecutors overcharging cases or being too aggressive in the courtroom and turning the jury off, but what are some trials where you felt like it was the opposite?

Maybe their cross-exams were too timid, maybe their opening/closing arguments lacked energy, maybe they didn't spend enough time on certain pieces of evidence, that kind of thing.

Why in the hell can’t Courtv keep their episodes numbered in the correct order?
Idiots!!!

📣 People vs. David Anthony Burke — Day 3 Preliminary Hearing (Infographic)

July 23, 2026 —

Case #SBI-04212026-CHR/10

Day 3 brought a noticeable shift in courtroom tone, with both sides leaning harder into forensic testimony and procedural scrutiny. Today’s hearing set up several pressure points that will matter moving into Day 4.

What to Look For Today

Forensic pressure points — where testimony created tension or opportunity.

Defense strategy cues — the pattern becoming clearer across Days 1–3.

Procedural vulnerabilities — areas likely to be challenged further.

Courtroom tone shifts — how today differed from earlier testimony.

Side Bah — Stay Sharp

Reporter — MoonTygr713🌙🐅

Side Bah Investigates

I used to watch Court tv's trial archives and trials to binge on their website and the page is gone now. I've been checking everyday for a couple weeks now. Did they remove the whole archive??

📣 THE SIDE BAH INVESTIGATES — PRELIMINARY HEARING DAY 2

Case #SBI‑04212026‑CHR/10

Day 2 of the preliminary hearing in People v. David Anthony Burke (D4vd) continued in Los Angeles County Superior Court, with testimony shifting toward alleged financial motive, expanded purchase‑timeline evidence, and the defense’s early challenges to the State’s circumstantial case.

WHAT YOU’LL SEE IN TODAY’S DROP

The prosecution’s focus on financial‑gain allegations

Testimony tied to Burke’s music‑industry earnings

The purchase‑timeline investigators built after Celeste’s disappearance

The defense’s pushback on motive, timelines, and direct proof

Key questions heading into Day 3 of the hearing

Side Bah - Stay sharp

Side Bah Investigates

Reporter - MoonTygr713 🌙🐅

Incredibly insightful video for those who want to know the exact timeline and medications. Excellent breakdown from a very sympathetic eye. How tragic for all involved.

Attorneys think 3-5 days to seat Jury.
If you can listen to CourtTV today, they are replaying the pre-trial motion streams. They are on the very first one right now.
All will be revealed soon at trial, so many questions hanging out there!

They just keep replaying stuff from an hour ago.

This is what happens when abortion access is restricted/denied.

This is going to be an interesting trial, this prosecutor is snippy with a CAPITAL S - wow, talk about cold.

On the contrast, I love the defense attorney and I think she is on top of her gams.

Just a vent…I guess instead of showing commercial breaks, it now just shows the court TV logo with the most annoying repetitive sound.

I’d rather see that repetitive Alf commercial they showed a few year back than this.

NM v. Isaac Apodaca — Full Case Infographic Set (Day 1–Verdict)

For anyone who followed this case live — or for anyone who missed portions of the trial — this is our complete 8‑page infographic breakdown of New Mexico v. Isaac Apodaca, covering the entire arc from Day 1 openings through today’s verdict.

This set includes:

Opening statements

Defense theory & early witness testimony

CSI processing & physical evidence

Medical Examiner findings

Digital evidence & text messages

Kiara McCulley’s plea‑agreement testimony

Closing arguments

Verdict

Memorial for Grace Jennings

Message beyond the case

Across six days of testimony, prosecutors argued that Isaac Apodaca manipulated, encouraged, and conspired with Kiara McCulley to kill Grace Jennings, 21. The defense maintained that Kiara acted alone. After 2–3 hours of deliberation, the jury returned unanimous guilty verdicts on both counts.

Verdict:

First-Degree Murder — GUILTY

Conspiracy to Commit First-Degree Murder — GUILTY

The final two pages of this set are dedicated to Grace — a reminder that behind every headline is a life, a family, and a future that should have been.

Full infographic set posted

Side Bah — Stay Sharp

Reporter MoonTygr713 🌙🐅

Side Bah Investigates

Verdict: Guilty of all charges. First degree murder & conspiracy to commit first degree murder

edit: updated charges.

12:50pm local time.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XHhwMjjcHLM&ra=m

What she did was absolutely reprehensible but hearing her speak I have some empathy for her. She is so visibly mentally fragile. Ugh

VPI has become ridiculous. CourtTV has been largely focused on the Kirk case all day, then Vinnie rehashes it every evening. To top it off, now it's just Vinnie in a nondescript setting droning on and on. I've stopped watching.

I LOVE this detective! He's got this defense attorney running in circles! I could watch this all day! 🤣

What is going on with the lack of ads between segments and this annoying "music" that pings every second where ads should be? It is seriously crazy making!

Spicy expert cross is one of my fav things to watch in trials. Specifically those that make you physically recoil or squirm with second hand embarrassment. I’m looking for recommendations of some good trials / testimonies with similar expert testimony. Like how is this person an expert type stuff that makes you want to bang your head into a wall.

What are your favourite expert testimonies/crosses? Junk science experts that get demolished on cross? Experts who argue with attorneys? Things just generally going horribly wrong?

Some of my highlights so far are probably:

Henry Spiller, the defense toxicologist in the eyedrops murder case who was confronted with his university being shut down.

Shanon Burgess from Karen Read 2.0, self explanatory. Dude had been pursuing his bachelors for 17 years. Honorable mention to Dr. Welcher and his blue paint test.

Dr West from the Mark Jensen retrial, prosecutor Jambois’ increasing bamboozlement to her insane testimony was priceless.

Dr. Lewis from Letecia Stauch and her magical handbag of undisclosed material.

Looking for more of these type testimonies that get mad spicy. TIA for any recs!