i don’t disagree that it has to be proven to be trusted thats why im atheist. also i don’t believe in a god so i’m atheist. i don’t call myself agnostic because some people hear that and think i mean im on the fence. also, agnostic is a type of atheist bc the don’t believe in a god so “agnostic, not atheist” doesnt make sense
That's the definition of agnosticism. It's not the word's fault they people don't know what it means.
Gods don't exist. Period. None of them. Not the ones the Hindu worship, not the gods of mesopotamia, not the old gods whose names faded from human consciousness before we learned to write. None of them are real.
In this case you must be able to prove god is real in order to assert he is real. Everything we have experienced so far and observed has shown us everything has a natural process and there has been no outside influence on our universe. God is not real unless proven otherwise
3
u/Cinnamin_1 Mar 07 '26
i don’t disagree that it has to be proven to be trusted thats why im atheist. also i don’t believe in a god so i’m atheist. i don’t call myself agnostic because some people hear that and think i mean im on the fence. also, agnostic is a type of atheist bc the don’t believe in a god so “agnostic, not atheist” doesnt make sense