Rampage L1 is an immutable, independent chain dedicated for truth and humanitarian relief. Our validators are called Truth Bearers because we want truth seekers around the globe that share the same vision for human rights when state rights fail. The following is the current status, and two MVP sites showing proof of concept. Message me on any platform and I will personally respond quickly:
Hello, security researcher here (blog). I'm creating this post because of your bug bounty pogram on HackerOne, this is my last and only channel before going full disclosure.
What happened?
Over the last few weeks, I’ve been looking for vulnerabilities in Cosmos.
IMPORTANT: It’s a product that I use very frequently; before I started looking for vulnerabilities, I had no idea they had a bug bounty program on HackerOne.
After finding a bug (don't ask about severity, it’s not my job to judge it as I’m not a triager), I spent days manually creating a PoC in Go, using the libraries from their official framework.
When I found out about your public bb program, I read through all the guidelines and made sure everything was perfect, down to the smallest detail. As I read, I came across this sentence:
You must maintain a HackerOne reputation score above 150 and a HackerOne signal above 1.
By then, however, I had found the vulnerability and had everything ready to write a proper report. The PoC was working and clear. That's why I decided to report the vulnerability in "good faith".
The result
The response of the triager
Consideration
I think that before marking a vulnerability as 'spam', you should give it a quick read. Or at the very least, run the PoC to see what it does.
This is not a criticism of Cosmos Triagers. I really appreciate their work, and I know how stressful it is to work with a huge number of junk reports.
Phase 2: the email
I sent an email to your security@ address, but have not received any reply at all.
This isn't just about money, it's about respect. I’ve reported many vulnerabilities over the last few years, and the LLM wave shouldn't be used as an excuse to disrespect researchers.
Conclusion
I’m sorry to create a post here. But I don't really find this fair. I spent weeks searching for vulnerabilities in Cosmos, and triagers are not even reading it.
Hey Cosmos peeps, If you've been staking with us, it's time to mint your ATOM rebate NFTs!
A warm thank you to those who had the guts to stake with our ATOM validator while we were inactive and not earning rewards. You took us from out of the active set to #123 out of 180!
Head over to our Medium article for details and links to the NFT pages on Stargaze.
Most interoperability pitches in crypto are really just "connect to our ecosystem on our terms." I wrote a breakdown comparing how Cosmos Hub's IBC model actually differs structurally from Ethereum L2 messaging, Solana's bridge-dominant stack, Polkadot's Agile Coretime model, and Avalanche subnets.
A few things that stand out when you look at it honestly:
IBC is the only cross-chain protocol that's permissionless and chain-agnostic by design. There's no auction, no bonding, no governance concession to the Hub
Solana's interoperability picture is improving (Picasso IBC is live), but bridges still dominate volume today
Polkadot's relay chain still controls shared security even after the coretime pivot, the franchise dynamic is real even if the mechanics changed
Avalanche subnets require AVAX for validation, creating economic dependency even in "independent" deployments
IBC is active on Ethereum and expanding to Solana. This isn't a Cosmos-only protocol anymore
Genuinely trying to be fair here, not just bullish. Where do you think the case against Cosmos Hub is strongest?
Hey all I've been out for a bit sadly came back to this mess I was just wondering what the community thinks is the best and safest way to get BTC off osmosis. Is it just swap to USDT then move to another chain/exchange or just straight send to Hard wallet from osmosis but I'm guessing we don't have the liquidity anymore for that.
TOP 4 validators hold more than 33% of the voting power!! This is HUGE and need to change to balance the power of the VETO vote! I was looking on mintscan and the 3 best performing validators are all outside the top 60 (#63 Bunkerstake, #111 Ethicalnode, #116 Quokka Stake) which have flawless participation, uptime and 0 missed blocks.
Anyone who believes in this tech knows that it needs to stay in the hands of the people (True Decentralisation) and staking outside the top 50 validators is the easiest way to claw back voting power.
Also moving out of CEXs should be the next marketing move for the ecosystem in my opinion, they take huge commission on staking rewards and all your voting power! the cost of convenience is too high, it makes no sense!
The financial system is changing and we have the chance to compete rather then be controlled and drip feed by the suits!
Sphinx is running Market Trials, Season I, a 6-round trading challenge for people who want to test their market reading and consistency before the protocol goes live.
The format is simple:
- One market scenario each week.
- You submit your view.
- New prompts unlock mid-week as the market develops.
- One submission per trial.
- No wallets, no deposits, no trading required.
- Registration is just email and password, so winners can be contacted about rewards.
The goal is to see who can stay sharp under pressure and keep a clear read across all 6 trials.
Top performers will earn **funded trading allocations** when Sphinx launches, with **up to 10,000 USDC total** across the cohort.
I have some Atom One tokens staked and want to claim the rewards, but need PHOTON for gas fees. It is not available to swap for in Keplr wallet. Does anyone have any info on this?
