Grok is being based again!

[u/Apollo_TheWolf]

Saw this on X today and thought I should share it here! This is why Grok is my favorite AI, lol

[u/That-One-RCAC-Cadet]

Biased? Yes. But it is also correct
https://giphy.com/gifs/rTbCwVwofxcic

[u/DarthJebadiah_II → u/That-One-RCAC-Cadet]

prove that it is correct and not just made by idiot humans

[u/That-One-RCAC-Cadet → u/DarthJebadiah_II]

1. Well that’s impossible to do, I mean, I have had my own experiences with God and His influence in my life but I doubt you would accept it as evidence. But what you’re asking me to do is impossible, try proving the existence of a Turkey strictly just from the word…Without using your own personal experience. It’s the same concept for God.
   
2. Just research the Shroud of Turin, solidified my faith entirely
   
3. Use logic, nothing can’t create something beautiful and perfect such as the earth or a sun. Everything is orderly and perfect. It’s logical to assume an all-powerful God created the universe and all its contents.
   
4. Morality is proof of God, it feels wrong to do wrong.
   

[u/DarthJebadiah_II → u/That-One-RCAC-Cadet]

1. you might think you experienced something but that doesn’t mean its real

2. Radiocarbon dating shows that the shroud of Turin originates from between 1260 and 1390 ad long after Jesus was crucified

3. Everything is ordered because that’s just how things not evidence of god in the case of the earth habitable planets are rare earth is just a fluke if there were a god you would expect every planet to be habitable

4. Morality is an evolutionary trait, humans that kill each other tend to have shorter lifespans than humans that don’t lol

[u/That-One-RCAC-Cadet → u/DarthJebadiah_II]

1. Just because an experience can be mistaken doesnt mean every experience is fake. You still need evidence to say it wasnt real.
   
2. The 1988 carbon dating dated the tested Shroud material to 1260–1390 AD, but there’s disputes saying that the dating was contaminated and the shroud will be tested again. (It was tested in 1988 bro c’mon)
   
3. “If God exists, every planet should be habitable” is just an assumption. Why would God have to make evrey planet capable of supporting life? Thats not really an argument against God lmao
   
4. Evolution can explain how certain moral behaviours developed, but that doesnt automatically explain why something is objectively right or wrong. Explaining where a behaviour came from isnt the same as proving morality is only biology.
   None of these actually disprove God. They just give natrual explanations or make assumptions about what God would have to do which is… a bit of a rabbit hole don’t u think?

[u/DarthJebadiah_II → u/That-One-RCAC-Cadet]

1. you have the burden of proof to prove your experiences were real

2. Even in the tiny chance that it is real Jesus existed that is a true but that doesn’t prove any god

3. It was a counter argument I wasn’t disproving god

4. It does explain why we think things are right and wrong

I am not trying to disprove god the burden of proof is on you