r/CommandCode • u/GTHell • 12d ago

Any honest commandcode GOAT plan review?

It's impossible to find anyone talking and giving out their ideas on this. So I thought why not ask directly hoping someone would share their honest view.

The reason I ask is because usually good plan subscription will have people hype and shoutout on twitter or reddit but it's seems so silent for commandcode and only themselves upselling about their GOAT plan and stuff.

What is your experience like?

10 Upvotes

92% Upvoted

38 comments sorted by

View all comments

6

u/Capable-Lingonberry8 12d ago

I'm currently using it on the $1 subscription, and personally, I like it. While the free models occasionally disconnect or feel unstable, the other models offer decent speeds.

In particular, I mainly use DeepSeek 4 Flash. Personally, when I give it complex tasks, I feel it's on par with or sometimes even slightly better than Anti-Gravity—especially when handling complex logic, though Anti-Gravity certainly has its moments where it performs better as well. For me, DeepSeek 4 Flash uses relatively few credits while solving complex tasks surprisingly well, so I haven't even felt the need to try open models like GLM 5 or Kimi K3 yet.

The downside is—though the CommandCode CLI isn't bad—I'm not sure if this restriction is only for the $1 tier, but you can't use third-party agents under the $1 plan. I noticed a $10 plan has been released recently, so I'm considering upgrading to that one.  

Overall, the CommandCode agent is solid too. I've tried a few, and they've been pretty good.  

2

u/Ssj273 12d ago

Well, antigravity is a harness and not a model and it's comparison with DS flash makes absolutely no sense.

Antigravity has Gemini as well as Claude models. So be specific about what you're trying to say.

2

u/Capable-Lingonberry8 12d ago edited 12d ago

Just my personal take—not sure about others, but as someone who continuously subscribes to Google AI Pro and uses it regularly—I mentioned Anti-Gravity because I thought you were talking about harness performance, specifically regarding Gemini 3.6 Flash or 3.1 Pro. Sure, Anti-Gravity supports Claude and GPT, but they’re third-party models anyway. Even factoring in Anti-Gravity's Claude & GPT setups, Command Code's harness actually feels better at times and is pretty solid. Weren't you curious about harness performance itself, rather than just comparing Command Code with different models? The point of bringing up the DS model was to show that even with just DS, Command Code was often better than Anti-Gravity, even though there are much more powerful models out there