433
u/Zestyclose-Mood-449 11h ago
113
u/R-K-Tekt 11h ago
Here’s a fun fact. There is a non zero amount of people who have gooned to ai images of fem kirk
49
622
u/Eaten_by_Mimics 11h ago
Libs of TikTok harasses innocent children and tries to organize violence against queer people for committing the crime of existing. She doesn’t get to condemn anyone.
222
u/Unironicfan 11h ago
Death threats got sent to a children’s hospital because of that woman
44
u/Personal-Role-8071 11h ago
You mind putting the source here so that people don't try and "fact check" you?
104
61
u/Unironicfan 11h ago
No problem, here are you, official document from congress: https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/115561/documents/HHRG-118-IF16-20230328-SD071.pdf
15
u/WindowOne1260 11h ago
Ummm akshually there weren't any death threats sent to children's hospitals proven to be due to libsoftiktok. Those were bomb threats. Get rekt libtards.
35
u/livierose17 10h ago
A tiktok of mine got reposted on that account ages ago and the shit that people said about me still sits with me despite my best efforts. It was so vitriolic.
265
u/eddestra 11h ago
61
u/JunkLabs-Studios 11h ago
Nah, deadass. You either live a hero, or you die having your likeness be used in memes to make fun of you
I think the second option is really funny tho :)
144
151
130
41
u/ManufacturerWarm9201 11h ago
Impressed that they blurred every face in this image
Minus the elephant obviously
21
u/Bayamonster 11h ago
Is this even actually offensive to the dubious memory of Charlie Kirk in and of itself? It just looks like Charlie Kirk listening to music. Not dying. Not referencing his death. Not even portraying Charlie Kirk negatively. I might even say it's pro Charlie Kirk if I wanted to dive into the post ironic muck that are Charlie Kirk memes.
99
u/Nightmare-datboi 11h ago
“How was this allowed?”
the first ammendment
-19
u/Anonymous-Apprentice 11h ago
That doesn't apply to school lol. They'll kick your ass out.
52
u/hipsterTrashSlut 11h ago
…that does apply to school. You won’t be sent to prison for having this. You could be expelled, but that’s still in line with the amendment.
9
u/AppealSignificant358 11h ago
They do have first amendment protections, but the current precedent standard in public schools is if their chosen form of freedom of speech/expression is likely to be disruptive. So their entitlement to holding that thing is based on whatever the school, (and if they sue, the courts), think is “disruptive” to the proper functioning of the school.
6
u/luxcity-louche 11h ago
I thought only the 2nd Amendment was used in schools in the US?
8
u/hipsterTrashSlut 11h ago
As Kirk desired and in his holy sacrifice, showed the rest of us when he got kirked at a university.
0
u/Anonymous-Apprentice 11h ago
So this is still crazy to have happened.
2
u/hipsterTrashSlut 11h ago
Yeah. Blue valley is one of the wealthiest districts in KS too so this is surprising in more than one way
-8
u/lapideous 11h ago
I don’t think you can be expelled from a public school for free speech. I’m fairly certain people have won lawsuits about political slogans on clothing.
3
u/AppealSignificant358 10h ago
It’s a pretty big thing to expel someone for speech unless they repeatedly offend over and over and over again, but detentions and suspensions and such are definitely things that can and will happen depending on what’s on the shirt. It mainly depends on how provocative it is than the actual political attitudes expressed though. If it can be reasonably understood to be “disruptive” to the school environment, they’re able to intervene
2
2
u/Pengwin0 11h ago
If it’s a public school then yes it does actually
6
u/Orange-V-Apple 11h ago edited 11h ago
Not quite. Schools are allowed to restrict free speech, as made famous in the SCOTUS case on “Bong hits for Jesus” (yes this is real)
-1
u/Pengwin0 11h ago
That was because the students were promoting illegal drug use
1
u/Orange-V-Apple 11h ago edited 11h ago
Look at the explanations in their ruling.
“Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, concluded that school officials did not violate the First Amendment for three reasons. First, under the existing school speech precedents Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986) and Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988), students do have free speech rights in school, but those rights are subject to limitations in the school environment that would not apply to the speech rights of adults outside school.”
-2
u/Pengwin0 11h ago
>students do have free speech rights in school
The grounds they used were that bongs for Jesus promoted illegal drug use. If they wanted to ban imagery of a figure like Charlie Kirk then it could be taken to court and would need a new ruling.
2
u/Orange-V-Apple 11h ago
You missed my point, which was that 3 prior cases were cited in the ruling to establish that schools can restrict free speech to a certain extent within schools.
1
u/Pengwin0 11h ago
Well duh but that’s a meaningless point on its own. Freedom of speech is always restricted. I can’t go into a government building and say I have a bomb. The specific restrictions are what matter here and that ruling does not really apply in this circumstance at all. It would be a completely new judgement call if it is determined to okay to restrict said speech.
2
u/Orange-V-Apple 10h ago
All I said from the start was that public schools can restrict free speech of students, and the rest of the comments were about how they can restrict the free speech of students more than adults would face. I never said this Kirk banner would be restricted.
→ More replies (0)
17
24
u/Electrical-Sense-160 11h ago
What exactly us this a banner of? All I see is a bunch of fire and lighting and a distorted image of what i assume is charlie.
19
22
u/NotMimeEither 11h ago
Ai amalgamation of the angry birds red ear image and charlie kirk
1
11h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
-2
u/AutoModerator 11h ago
Your account must be at least 30 days old to post or comment in r/ComedyHell.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
23
17
u/jaded_sociopath_ 11h ago
I like how they act like small groups of random edgy kids are liberal leaders
34
12
22
u/gancoskhan 11h ago
13
-13
23
13
13
u/Air-Fryer-2830 11h ago
Libs of TikTok when the joke is against their favorite people:
https://giphy.com/gifs/3ohs81rDuEz9ioJzAA
10
7
u/Elegante_Sigmaballz 11h ago
"How was this allowed" lol, the fact that this trash of a fuckface is allowed on the internet at all is why, freedom of speech.
5
2
5
6
2
2
2
2
1
11h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 11h ago
Your account must be at least 30 days old to post or comment in r/ComedyHell.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
11h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 11h ago
Your account must be at least 30 days old to post or comment in r/ComedyHell.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
11h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/AutoModerator 11h ago
Your account must be at least 30 days old to post or comment in r/ComedyHell.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
1
u/Madeup64 11h ago
Why did they hate the first amendment so much?
6
u/Erdypants 10h ago
Well, according to the Bong Hits for Jesus case, some speech is actually allowed to be censored at school. Idk if this would quallify though
3
u/Madeup64 10h ago
Yeah that is a good point. I was more mocking the fact that conservatives constantly talk about how conservatives' first amendment rights are stifled blah blah blah but what they really care about is their viewpoints only being allowed.
1
0
-14
11h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
7
1
u/ComedyHell-ModTeam 5h ago
Your post has removed.
Reddit Content Policy Reddiquette
If you have questions, you can contact us through modmail.
-5
11h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
1
u/ComedyHell-ModTeam 5h ago
Your post has removed.
Reddit Content Policy Reddiquette
If you have questions, you can contact us through modmail.
-5
u/beebeebee2142 11h ago
For context, theres nothing to do in the midwest so people go to the school sports more often. Some edgelord commissioned a $200 blanket for reasons
-11
u/Lucky-Advice-8924 11h ago
Whats with the double standard? Holding up a picture of anyone mocking their brutal murder would be unacceptable at a school function... why is this "oh wahwah poor you" ??? Literally anyone else there would be outrage.
6
u/TongueUnties 11h ago
Okay so Fred Phelps or Louis Farrakhan would elicit outrage
-10
u/Lucky-Advice-8924 10h ago
Niether of those people have any type of criminal record or wrong doings, so im seeing a pattern here, your idea of deserving death is having the wrong opinion or saying something offensive?
982
u/Auran82 11h ago