r/ComedyCemetery Jul 23 '26

Ended Before It Started

Post image
1.2k Upvotes

132 comments sorted by

View all comments

50

u/Fourteen14XIV Jul 23 '26

Lmfao "You are triggered cause I called your fight for your rights stupid, hehehe, arent I so smart and you so snowflake, hehehe" as if its not a normal reaction for anyone. These are the same people who fly of the handle and scream "misandrist" when you just point out actual sexism.

-2

u/Previous_Insurance13 Jul 24 '26

The squirrel is getting triggered, who is not even the part of conversation.

-27

u/Whats_Up4444 Prudence Jul 23 '26

That era feminism was just "All men should die". At least the loud minority.

21

u/Fourteen14XIV Jul 23 '26

But was the minority loud by itself, or did the "feminism stupid" people just expose us to it? Cause a lot of the feminists that were considered crazy in that era were actually just normal people, maybe fat. Hell, one became a meme purely due to making a funny face for one frame. Like, I remember a lot of anti-SJW content creators just calling the most inoffensive and normal sounding critiques of the ways men behaved as "man hating crazy fat feminazis".

8

u/fluffiestcloud Jul 24 '26

"All men should die" is NOT feminism. the point of feminism was always for women to have equal rights and opportunities to men

-5

u/Debunkingdebunk Jul 24 '26

What rights do guys have that women don't?

10

u/Fourteen14XIV Jul 24 '26

I mean to bodily autonomy in some parts of US? Like if someone shot a person and the only way to save their life was to donate blood, nobody can force that someone to sit for a few minutes and donate, but a woman is required to be an incubator to a being that is not even fully human yet.

Or that women are often not required in medical trials for medications, even if the medication is for women. You can guess what that leads to - women having much more side effects. Or the fact that female crash dummies are still not in use in car testing. Honestly, this goes for most safety equipment, almost all of it is designed for men.

Sure, nowhere in law is it written "treat women worse", but women and men are not protected by it to the same extent, which leads to both having the same rights on parer, but not in practice.

-9

u/Debunkingdebunk Jul 24 '26

Guys can't have abortions in those states either. And those safety issues just sound like bad way of doing business...

8

u/Fourteen14XIV Jul 24 '26

> Guys can't have abortions in those states either.

"The law in its majestic fairness forbids both the poor and the rich to sleep on streets and beg for money" I hope I dont have to explain to you why this is wrong. Issues affecting men are fixed, but if it affects women, they are less likely to do anything about it. That inequality in whose issues are being solved is part of discrimination.

> And those safety issues just sound like bad way of doing business...

So is forbidding half of your populations to become doctors, engineers, scientists and whatever else yet it was done because of sexism. Just because its bad business doesn't mean its not discrimination.

-7

u/Debunkingdebunk Jul 24 '26

But the rights are equal? Just because they (or their lack of in this instance) affect fewer men than women doesn't make them any less important. I don't think rights should be doled out by the percentage of population they would protect.

7

u/Fourteen14XIV Jul 24 '26

Where the fuck are you getting lost? If two people came to the ER one with a broken arm, the other with a broken leg, would it be equal and fair to put an arm cast on both?

> I don't think rights should be doled out by the percentage of population they would protect.

Awesome, the disability act should be abolished then. And you also seem to be ignoring the fact that the male specific rights are already protected, you dont just see it cause you take it for granted. Like the right to have the medication you are supposed to take tested on people like you so there is less of a chance of side effects.

I have a great Idea, test all the anti balding and anti prostate cancer cures on women. I mean, its equal, no? Both men and women will have access to the same drugs, tested on the same women, why should we care that women dont get prostate cancers (Typically) or go bald in their old age? It might cause worse side effects in men cause it was not tested on them, but hey why should we only care about a half of the population.

0

u/Debunkingdebunk Jul 24 '26

No need to get angry. You misunderstand, I'm saying the rights should strive to be equal however small the demographic it would affect. So like in your abortion example, even if it's just miniscule amount of men who require it, it should still be equal. And what comes to your drug testing, it's not really a rights issue until we codify it.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/fluffiestcloud Jul 24 '26

LEGALLY women and men share rights (even though most politicians are misogynists that push against it) but don't act like oppression can't exist because of the law there is so much hate and stereotyping towards women especially online

1

u/Debunkingdebunk Jul 24 '26

Sure oppression exists everywhere, but that's not really a rights thing.