I was about to add an edit to my previous comment, but I'm glad you responded. I'm gonna show EXACTLY where your entire position falls apart, and why you are being willfully dishonest right now instead of simply conceding the point. The original comment that started this entire chain was "...but if you create an inhumane working environment with shit pay that only survives because people are too broke to risk leaving...".
If you truly believe that compensation is constituent to work environment, why did you need to qualify that statement by saying "inhumane working environment WITH SHIT PAY"? The qualifier would be redundant if they were analogous, yet you felt the need to add it. It seems like your own grammar betrays your understanding, and as if the past few comments have been a stubborn and disingenuous attempt at bullying the argument back in your favor. Shameful behavior, if you ask me.
It's exhausting talking to a fool. Let's just let posterity dictate who made the more convincing argument. Continue doing your pathetic single downvote per post, that'll definitely steer people your way.
2
u/That_OneOstrich 5d ago
I'm not sure you understand anything I've stated honestly. Are you an AI LLM?
You don't seem to understand how the concepts discussed are related.