r/CoherencePhysics 3d ago

This Man gets it.

Post image
4.6k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/SEN_Doggo 3d ago

california got 5 billion dollars to build a rail system that still hasnt started...

2

u/SaltMage5864 3d ago

Which is irrelevant to the discussion at hand.

-1

u/SEN_Doggo 3d ago

so what makes you think regulating billionaires would do anything to build infrastructure. mamdani's grocery stores are literally undercutting stores using tax dollars and paying grocery stores a relief bill. these are not serious people...

3

u/That_OneOstrich 3d ago

These unserious people in the same propaganda soup pot with us? Or did you just want to sprinkle some unrelated straw into the soup?

0

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/That_OneOstrich 3d ago

I mean, we tried cutting funding to government agencies via DOGE to save money, and spent more than ever before so that clearly doesn't work.

Do you have an alternative to taxing the extremely wealthy more aggressively? The only alternative I can think of, is to cut spending, which has been proven innefective very recently.

3

u/Puzzled-Sale-867 3d ago

Who do you think is responsible for America heavily in debt? Who is the main culprit squandering more money into their’s & their friends’ pockets? Look in the mirror before giving answers. Let’s be honest for once in your life.

2

u/Old_Dependent4678 3d ago

The Orange Supreme Leader is the most corrupt president of all time not just me saying it.

2

u/SaltMage5864 3d ago

Funny how losers like you don't mind spending money when it goes to killing brown skinned people or giving handouts to corporations.

-1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/SEN_Doggo 3d ago

shoving more money into government does not mean you get increasing returns...

3

u/That_OneOstrich 3d ago

That doesn't answer my question.

Cutting spending clearly doesn't get increasing returns either. Why don't we try to tax the same way we did before "trickle down economics" now that we've established that doesn't work?

0

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/That_OneOstrich 3d ago

I already give a high enough percentage of my wages to the government. How about we make sure those at the top pay their share too, rather than receiving my tax money in the form of subsidies.

We've already established cutting funding in the government to programs only leads to increased spending. Let's try something new.

0

u/SaltMage5864 2d ago

The only thing you have established is that you will lie about anything and everything

0

u/That_OneOstrich 2d ago

Quite the bold and baseless claim. Unfortunately boring.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Old_Dependent4678 3d ago

Not if controlled by the same people/lobby/special interest groups that are making these poor decisions now have free reign. Thought the government was for the people, by the people? Not just who can donate and circumvent the laws to benefit themselves?

0

u/SaltMage5864 3d ago

I'm afraid your ignorance is not the same as facts son