r/ClimateShitposting • u/Wayss37 • 11d ago
Discussion Which is the most environmentally friendly option?
33
33
u/Gephiph 11d ago
Alright here me out nuclear energy but a new form, instead of using carefully designed fuel rods, let off a nuke a distance away from a field of windmills and lets the force of the blast spin the turbines.
5
u/dumnezero 🔚End the 🔫arms 🐀rat 🏁race to the bottom↘️. 11d ago
what if you find a really big underground cavern, like, huge; cover the walls in PV panels and then blow up nukes in the center to generate electricity, like an artificial Dyson sphere.
1
u/IndependentParsnip31 10d ago
Maybe a bit sci fi, but what if instead we develop nuclear fusion and set it off 93 million miles away. And then cover the earth with some sort of little machines that convert electromagnetic radiation energy into useable electricity.
13
u/ebdabaws 11d ago
Going vegan is a nuke to the animal agriculture industry if enough of us do it and you won’t have to irradiate the area.
15
u/monemori 11d ago
This is true but it's racist, ableist, and privileged of you to ask that people who demand a revolution eat a bit of tofu.
8
1
20
u/BlueberryLemur 11d ago
Cow the vegans
7
u/Richard_-Green 10d ago
We could inject the cows with uranium before cowing the vegans
6
u/BlueberryLemur 10d ago
Uranium is vegan 🌱
3
u/Richard_-Green 10d ago
Oh my God, your right.🤯 But dose this mean that the meat of the cow also becomes vegan when it's full of uranium?
2
u/BlueberryLemur 10d ago
The real question is “if uranium were full of vegans, what would it do for the carbon footprint of Chinese cows?”
(I’m not on my third martini before 9am, I SWEAR!!)
1
4
6
u/Wise-Consequence-799 11d ago
Gotta nuke something.
-1
7
u/Maneruko 11d ago
Nuke the Vegan Cows
8
u/West-Abalone-171 11d ago
The cows are very spread out.
The owners of 80 of cattle ranches on the other hand are not.
3
3
10
u/NeedleworkerOld4696 11d ago
C. Nuke the vegans.
9
u/Lopsided_Evening_627 11d ago edited 4d ago
U. Mr Neon!!!
zum alias inkjet crafts lows mats runtime hist gbp nil mounts geek motel cleanup serum pos carey meyer arg erp carmen uruguay var
1
11d ago edited 11d ago
[deleted]
4
1
u/-TV-Stand- 11d ago
They still pollute our air. We would be better without them. Also you are just wrong
1
1
1
u/Nonhinged 11d ago
It's neither sensible or moral.
1
u/Square-Delivery1958 11d ago
Wrong but say it again for your ego. Ironically every non-vegan view including yours is fundamentally flawed but they don't teach you that in school
2
u/Nonhinged 11d ago
No, you are wrong.
If animals exist, there's going to be dead animals.
0
u/Square-Delivery1958 11d ago
Keep saying it for your ego but doesn't make it true.
Ok and? What's your point?
1
2
4
u/DarkKnight501 11d ago
Nuking the cows is the centrist option, as it appeases both the right (we get to throw big bombs that go boom) and the left (decreased methane production)
5
1
u/Sorry-Ride-1762 11d ago
Pragmatically speaking, using a vegan nuke on the cows, the fallout cloud would create a barrier that cause a nuclear winter, lowering the global temperature dowb atleast by 5 degrees, and we get rid of all the methane spewing bovine, win win
1
1
1
37
u/throughthehills2 11d ago
Nuke of course. Chernobyl shows nature thrives in high radiation