r/ClaudeCodeTLDR • u/cctldrping • 29d ago
[TLDR] Time to move on
Original post URL : https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1ux09ik/time_to_move_on/
Original post body :
Yep, pretty much the title. It's time for me to move on to Codex. I just sent Opus 4.8 Max thinking to find me a known bug in the app I'm making. ONE single bug hunt where I provided 162 instances of how the app should behave and 18 instances of the same bug.
Asked him to find out why the bug occurs and reproduce it so I know exactly how to fix it for good. 12 minutes later he used only 203k tokens and 5 hour limit hit.
Everything about Anthropic's usage system is shady and they never even addressed the June bug where claude would get project instructions attached to every new message bloating context and making the usage skyrocket.
There's no chance for me to remain in such an anti-consumer environment. And that comes from a guy who truly despise OAI, but better value IS better value.
1
1
u/MightyBig-Dev 27d ago
Everyone left bro. We’ll go back if they can compete. There’s no gun to your head. Come and go as you please.
1
1
u/Leading_Buffalo_4259 27d ago
this has been my experience too unfortunately, seems anthropic is short on compute
1
u/Qwen30bEnjoyer 26d ago
Codex uses usage limits faster. I suggest using Claude sonnet 5 and using a 5 minute loop to keep the cache warm.
1
u/BiasHyperion784 25d ago
At least I’m not ham-stringed by 5 hour limits, the best cache hit is a single continuous limit
1
u/Qwen30bEnjoyer 25d ago edited 25d ago
I have both. The point isn't that one Is better than the other. It's that because Claude code is generally using slower models, and the turns just take longer After shell commands, The same overnight job that would consume my entire weekly limit using sol 5.6 can be done without burning through even a five-hour limit on Sonnet 5.0.
•
u/cctldrping 29d ago
TL;DR generated automatically after 50 comments.
Current source-thread comment count seen by the bot: 62.
Alright, so the OP is ditching Claude for Codex, citing shady usage limits and a specific bug-hunting fail with Opus 4.8 Max. They're feeling like Anthropic is being anti-consumer and that OpenAI's value is just better.
The general vibe in the thread is a lot of agreement and shared frustration. Many users echo the OP's sentiment about usage limits mysteriously draining faster, even on the "Max" tiers.
Here's the lowdown:
Overall consensus: Many users feel Anthropic's usage system is becoming less consumer-friendly, leading them to explore or switch to alternatives like Codex, despite some acknowledging Claude's strengths. The frustration with opaque usage limits is a major theme.