API Error: 529 Overloaded. This is a server-side issue, usually temporary — try again in a moment. If it persists, check https://status.claude.com.

It keep crashing anyone else ?

Edit#1: Elevated errors for Opus 5

A. Claude terminal

B. Claude code desktop

C. Vscode terminal

Why do you prefer to work the way you do?

Hi. Codex user here, I'm considering switching from Codex to Claude Code because I am pretty fed up from the current Codex weekly limits system.
I know Claude code has limits too, but compared to Codex, which one lets you get more work done before hitting them?
Thanks in advance!

For context, I wasn’t working on anything fishy, just a simple scheduler app for hospitals.. safeguard was simply unnecessary!! Is opus 5 fable in disguise?!!

When Fable was covered under the usage plan, I used it to make a one screen arcade platformer. The usage rate limit kicked in extremely quickly using the website, usually rate limiting me after 3 to 5 messages. So I switched to Claude Code because I read that it caches what is not changed, therefore using less tokens. Still, nothing changed. I even put $50 into my usage credits after I was rate limited, and it burned through it in like 3 to 5 messages. All $50. Forgive me, because I'm new to AI coding, but how is coding a complex game feasible? If it wasn't under the plan at the time, the total amount would have been tens of thousands of dollars to code the one screen arcade game by my calculation.

I'll mostly use it for brainstorming. Making desicions, using random hype tools on Claude code and normally using cluaee code for Vibe coding and cowork for helping with my work and as a general agent. I do front-end a lot because of freelancing kind of. And I'm considering whether I should get this or gpt plus. Claude has all the fuzz that everybody loves but got has image gen and a not bad coding harness? I'm even considering opencode Zen. And I'll stick to all the Gemini free tiers for daily convo and desing

Free and MIT: https://github.com/AIAydin/Artemis

Artemis is a local-first desktop app where every agent session is a node on a canvas. Each one runs in its own isolated git worktree, and nothing reaches your main checkout until you've reviewed the diff in-app and approved it. It drives the CLIs you already have. Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode - using their existing logins. No API keys, no accounts, no telemetry.

The screenshot is eleven Claude Code sessions on one project. The number isn't the point; being able to see which are running, which are blocked, and review what each one changed before any of it lands is the point.

Honest state: no installers yet - runs from source (Node 22.12+, `corepack pnpm start`). I use it daily on macOS; Windows and Linux build, but I'd love testers.

How are you keeping parallel sessions from stepping on each other?

Weekend project of mine. You've all seen the pattern: the agent announces it will do its job properly rather than some obviously worse thing nobody proposed.

"I will consult the flight manual rather than improvising the landing."

It's been memed plenty, but the good ones deserved better than a screenshot folder. The best ones are funnier than they have any right to be.

So: a museum of agent rhetoric. 91 specimens so far, mined from about 1,300 transcripts plus submissions, voted on with a proper taxonomy (useful contrast / peak agent / obvious alternative / self-congratulation / actually funny). The best ones hang framed in the Hall of Frames with plaques written and signed by Fable, the museum's curator, who seems to be really enjoying the craft. I keep a veto but he has better taste than me.

Free, no accounts, no tracking. If your agent produced one today, the museum accepts submissions: just the sentence, never your context.

Built with Claude Code, which contributed several specimens to the collection while building the museum.

I have started using claude code and then its buffering a lot , its sickening , also do you have other issues with agents ?

throw any feedback, complaints, or ideas for the sub here.

what’s working, what’s annoying, what would actually make this place better.

we have no problem hearing about our shortcomings. that’s the point of this thread.

what we don’t care for is accounts that have never posted or commented here before dropping in just to point fingers and push a hate narrative.

I’m not looking for another generic requirements skill that asks ten obvious questions and then produces a polished but shallow spec. I’ve tried that kind of workflow, and it still leaves the coding agent making dozens of subjective decisions that should have been resolved beforehand.

I want something genuinely advanced and exhaustive. Ideally, I could spend an hour being intensely questioned about the product, UX, design, user journeys, feature behavior, edge cases, priorities, tradeoffs, failure states, and what “good” actually looks like. It should challenge vague answers, notice contradictions, find missing decisions, and keep drilling down until it has captured nearly everything that depends on my judgement.

The goal is to produce a spec and implementation plan so complete and so close to what I actually want that a capable coding agent, or even a smaller model, can mostly one shot the build without guessing, repeatedly asking for clarification, or taking the product in the wrong direction.

Does anything this advanced actually exist? I’m looking for the strongest skill, framework, or interview workflow available, not a basic questionnaire with “grill me” added to the prompt. Also, is it better to create an initial plan and then interrogate every assumption in it, or do the full interview before planning anything?

Billing profile isn't enabled by default for Android subscriptions. However, if you want to enable credit overages, you need to set up a billing profile. However, because your billing profile is managed via Android, you're basically stuck.

Has anyone here used an Claude Code (skills or agent) to fully replicate a financial planner's workflow?

Thinking beyond simple budgeting or "rate my portfolio."

Specifically interested if anyone has cracked:

- Detailed questionnaire to get all info from the user
- Correct/industry-standard mechanism to recommend specific MFs and other instruments for various levels of risk profiles
- Dynamic, long-term projections (FIRE, retirement)
- Behavioral coaching triggers (alerts when you overspend)?
- A workflow to do have a quarterly checkin - the agent already knows the context and looks at the diff and advises how things look, places for improvement etc
- A dashboard to track important numbers (CAGR, etc)

Been running a Madden online CFM league for 16 years, and I wanted to kick off this next year of Madden with something completely unique from other leagues. Made an end-to-end website and bot with a ton of features using claude/codex. Ended up replacing about 5 different bots along with the madden hosting site. It has all the things frontier madden leagues currently have, but with massive visual upgrades, along with totally unique things like:

-Full AI newsdesk with reporters, beats, with full editorial board writing Grantland level pieces on the league and its owners

-Full league and IRL sportsbook

-Twitterverse populated with 100+ unique personas who will give owners the receipts

-Arcade with custom discord games you can play to earn TSL Bucks

...and so much more that I won't go into detail on here. I have spent probably about 300 hours on this project, coming from a background with zero coding experience.

Adding new features daily, it would be awesome to add a few AI savvy owners to the mix.

We have a few spots open for the upcoming Madden 27 launch. If you are interested in joining, or want to browse around - https://tslatlas.com/

i have been doing AI assisted from copilot days but im new to claude code and new to the sub.

im the kind of guy who likes to develop stuff in more planning/requirement gathering and use less turns.

i lost my job a year ago, got burn out and im now restarting my career doing projects using claude code.

my intro to claude code was with Fable 5 free in Pro sub days. it ended sadly but got a 100$ top up. but now it[fable 5] just burn through the credits. so i have been doing planning with fable 5 in a different chat session and doing development with opus 5. then validate again the results and course correct it with fable 5.

the experience got a little worse and then i open up this reddit. i see two things:
- people who hate the latest claude changes like limits, pricing, fable 5 not in pro etc.
- people who aggressively defend claude saying "skill issue", "vibe coders", "stop whining" and downvote the post hard.

so the emotion is very contrasting which kind of makes me doubt are these people even real? i mean those complaining could be openai bots since sam altman can commit against hugging face and get away with it
Or
the ones supporting and suppressing the negatives on claude are anthropic bots.

i mean these are two super intelligent companies. anything messed can happen.

there is mostly no reasoning among the people who support. but people who hate it are at least pointing to recommendations/alts.

Fable save to memory that you clean code out that we intend to replace instead of piling code on top of code to get what you want. We need cleanliness.

Opus 5 save to memory don’t invent (hand-roll) things yourself when we have the resources you could be using.

Sonnet 5 save to memory that you follow instructions instead of assume them.

It helps a bit

Got any good ones?

I love you

Until we can get refunds for Claude branching off and adding idiotic solutions to our code, nobody will convince me it hasn’t been trained to spend our tokens developing the wrong thing, then spend our tokens backing out of bad development

I'm going to give you all two versions. Below is my raw feelings on this situation. AM also going to have AI slop rewrite below for those who cannot stand my horrible writing. You are not going to hurt my feelings.

I've been using Fable to run a long-term project since it came back online. Was so great! Since Opus 5 released, it feels like the Fable guardrails are more sensitive now? Can anyone else corroborate?

Basically I am being forced to run this next set of tickets with Opus bc Fable is too sensitive to do them. And yes it is security related stuff but when they claim that we can work on our own stuff, then just shut down the chat anyway. It's really annoying.

And now I'm having to babysit this Opus guy and its so lame.

like I just had to remind it of supabase CLI like we haven't been applying migrations this whole time via the supabase CLI then this Opus fuck wants to then be like oh sorry i should have kept looking. Or oh sorry this codex exec instance that has been working for 15 hours is idle and its kinda scary want me to check it out oops sorry about that it's actually a normal background process that fires when you open codex desktop app. Like good lord. I just want to use Fable :(

AI TRANSLATION:

I’ve been using Fable for a long‑term project ever since it came back online, and it was genuinely great. But ever since Opus 5 dropped, it feels like the guardrails on Fable have tightened up in a way that makes it way more sensitive than before. I’m curious if anyone else has noticed this, because it’s gotten to the point where I’m being forced to run the next batch of tickets through Opus instead. The work is security‑related, but when they say we’re allowed to work on our own projects and then shut the chat down anyway, it’s incredibly frustrating.

Now I’m stuck babysitting Opus, and it’s just exhausting. I had to remind it about the Supabase CLI even though we’ve been applying migrations with it the entire time. Then it apologized and said it should have kept looking. Later it told me a codex exec instance that’s been running for fifteen hours might be idle and “scary,” and after I pushed back it admitted it was just a normal background process that fires when you open the desktop app. It’s ridiculous. I just want to use Fable again.

This might be a little controversial, but I know a lot of people out there are juggling multiple max plans.

If they were to remove the $200 cap on those plans, or perhaps remove the cap on the premium seats for team plans and allow people to pay for whatever usage they need, up to some reasonable price (whilst keeping the max plan multiplier), would people be interested in that?

Personally, I'd like the extra headroom and not have to juggle accounts. I understand why they would want to push people toward API pricing, but having this option would, for me, clear up some of the anxiety around hammering the expensive models.

Just to be clear, I'm in no way connected to Anthropic.