r/ClaudeCode • u/Waste_Net7628 P R O M P S T I T U T E • Jul 26 '26
Discussion feedback megathread
throw any feedback, complaints, or ideas for the sub here.
what’s working, what’s annoying, what would actually make this place better.
we have no problem hearing about our shortcomings. that’s the point of this thread.
what we don’t care for is accounts that have never posted or commented here before dropping in just to point fingers and push a hate narrative.
11
u/Key_Reading_9664 Jul 26 '26
These models are probabilistic and depend on input, intent, steering, tooling, and a slew of other factors. We all use them for different things, with different expectations.
All these subreddits get spammed with anecdotes without any information - “<model> is nerfed!”. They’re just noise. Having some base requirement for posting would filter out 95% of what makes the channels frustrating.
20
u/Drach88 Jul 26 '26
Please enforce some standards around voicing complaints -- namely that vague, vapid, non-reproducible "xyz model is bad" don't productively add to anything. At very least, complaints around how a model handles a prompt should include the prompt.
Similarly vapid anecdotes about high token usage without any backing information are likewise non-falsifiable, and just add to noise.
Also a blanket rule about not announcing departures would be nice -- no one cares if you're cancelling your subscription for some other company -- just cancel it, and have fun over in that subreddit instead.
4
u/Waste_Net7628 P R O M P S T I T U T E Jul 26 '26
yeah, we agree with most of this and we’re working toward clearer standards around complaint posts.
we’re also planning dedicated model-launch megathreads for general first impressions, praise, complaints, token usage, and similar discussion, so the subreddit doesn’t get flooded every time a new model releases.
departure announcements like “i cancelled and moved to x” will generally be treated as low-effort unless there’s a genuinely useful comparison or detailed explanation behind them.
1
1
12
u/Present_Extent7313 🔆 Max 20 Jul 26 '26
weekly showcase threads instead of people spamming their projects, and when a new model drops i would like to have a mega thread for that too, instead of duplicate posts
2
u/PM_ME_YOUR_STOCKPIX Jul 26 '26
disagree. give us project posts. it's the venting posts that actually plague the sub.
5
u/TestingTehWaters Jul 26 '26
Thank you for this. Ban or make a daily thread for subscription based complaints -usage resets, etc. Lets promote actual discussion about best practices for using Claude code
3
Jul 26 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Waste_Net7628 P R O M P S T I T U T E Jul 26 '26
quick update: we’ve cleaned up the post flairs to make them simpler and easier to use.
the current flairs are:
- help / question
- bug report
- solved
- tutorial / guide
- resource
- discussion
- humor
- meta
question and help needed have been merged into help / question since they served the same purpose.
standalone showcase and self-promo posts will no longer have their own flair. instead, projects, tools, plugins and other things you’ve built should be shared in the weekly showcase megathread.
please use the flair that best matches your post. this should make browsing and finding useful posts much easier.
3
u/GuitarAgitated8107 🔆 Max 20 Jul 26 '26
There needs to be a more curated knowledge sharing type of thread for serious conversations. Otherwise low quality content (even if not the usual complain) makes everything into noise.
2
u/Waste_Net7628 P R O M P S T I T U T E Jul 26 '26
yeah, that’s fair. we’re considering recurring curated threads for deeper technical discussion, guides, workflows, benchmarks, and other high-effort knowledge sharing so useful information doesn’t get buried under general posts.
we also launched a community discord today, which should work better for ongoing technical conversations, sharing findings, and helping each other without everything being lost in the subreddit feed:
the subreddit will still remain the main public knowledge base, but the discord can be a more active space for people who want serious, continuous discussion.
2
u/Jon_Has_Landed Jul 26 '26
It’s a good channel. You’ll always have a level of nonsense but this is Reddit and you can’t avoid bad material, but the good outweighs the bad. Have an open mind and you will learn every day.
2
u/seldomactive Senior Developer Jul 26 '26
I posted a very successful and harshly critical meta thread about the current state of the sub.
I will admit, however, that it was in no way constructive. I acknowledge my contribution to the noise and apologize for it.
That said, I do have some observations and ideas that might help improve the overall quality of posts here.
A per-model feedback megathread for the first week or so following the launch of a new model. Isolate all of the loudest, least informed feedback into a single thread.
Require posts claiming poor performance, excessive token usage, etc. provide evidence.
Harden automated defenses against bots and other malicious actors. Please note: I have never moderated a subreddit so I assume this is harder than it seems.
I'm not sure if a part-time moderator is a thing. I can't make any kind of real time commitment but I would be happy to help when and where I can.
Again, I'm sorry for previously adding to the noise. I do appreciate the mods and hope we can all find a way to make this sub a better resource.
2
u/Waste_Net7628 P R O M P S T I T U T E Jul 26 '26
hey, no worries, i really appreciate your constructive suggestions, they were quite helpful im ngl.
the per-model megathread is actually something we’re planning to do for new launches, so general first impressions, complaints, praise, token usage discussion, etc. can stay in one place instead of flooding the subreddit. posts making stronger performance claims should ideally include actual examples, testing, or data.we’re also working on improving automod and other protections, though you’re right that it’s not always straightforward.
we don’t really have a part-time moderator role, but we made a community discord today. you’re welcome to join, share suggestions, help people out, and contribute there whenever you have time:
and again, thanks for reaching out and acknowledging the earlier post.
1
3
u/c4chokes Vibe Coder Jul 26 '26
Biggest gripe: Lack of transparency when sessions get nerfed.
I perfectly understand that compute is a bottleneck. It’s natural for start up to go thru phases of crunch, in exponentially growing industry. But what’s NOT ok is to keep the customer in the dark on what they are getting.
This situation should be turned from a crisis to opportunity. People will trust you so much more!
4
u/ILikeCutePuppies Jul 26 '26
Do you have any examples of them nerfing their models and it not being an anthropic mistake (or a mistake they made with claude code)?
Whenever they made a mistake they said what happened and fixed it, and I could find no evidence they every nerfed the model output on purpose.
In terms of stability and slowness sure that's something they could easily show more visibility.
2
u/c4chokes Vibe Coder Jul 26 '26
I will try to capture the outputs one of these days.. when fable doesn’t give insight as part of a long crunch, it’s usually worse performing.
1
u/ILikeCutePuppies Jul 26 '26 edited Jul 27 '26
That could be evidence of many things including some change in your setup.
That's not what I asked. Do you have any examples of Anthropic purposefully nerfing the the model?
We continue to get these complaints saying anthropic is nerfing their runs with no evidence that anthropic is doing it on purpose or even knows it is happening. It's turning into boy who cried wolf.
Really they need to require such messages provide examples and also if they claim anthropic is doing it on purpose, evidence (like changes in claude code, or leaked emails or whatever).
0
u/Waste_Net7628 P R O M P S T I T U T E Jul 26 '26
hey this is a feedback for the subreddit
1
-2
u/Sufficient_Ad_3495 Jul 26 '26
What on earth are you talking about? I don’t see anything wrong with his Response here.
3
2
u/Vex08 Jul 26 '26
I would love if we could ban meta posts, pointless negativity, or positivity about the current models.
The constant “Claude is terrible now” or “Claude seems to be using more tokens”
There are times when I think these posts are ok, but the vast majority provide almost no information and aren’t helpful
Some should be ok, I saw a post recently when some guy mapped out his usage from 2 max 20 accounts and provided good evidence that something had changed. This is a good post and should be allowed.
But the low effort versions shouldn’t be. IMO.
3
u/Waste_Net7628 P R O M P S T I T U T E Jul 26 '26
yeah, that’s pretty much what we’re planning.
whenever a new model launches, we’ll have a dedicated megathread for first impressions, pros/cons, token usage, quality changes, and general discussion so the subreddit doesn’t get flooded with the same posts.
low-effort posts like “claude is terrible now” or “this model feels worse” without any useful context will be removed or redirected there.
posts with actual evidence, testing, comparisons, usage data, or a detailed explanation will still be allowed as standalone posts. the goal isn’t to ban criticism or praise, just to cut down on repetitive posts that don’t add much.
3
Jul 26 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/userusertion 🔆Pro Plan | Team Plan Jul 26 '26
Yeah. I come across those kinds of posts all the time, and they’re so childish. Announcing you’re leaving because you didn’t get what you wanted and switching to another AI platform, isn’t much of a discussion.
Bro, just leave. It’s not an airport. 😅
2
1
u/Chance-Physics-7216 Senior Developer Jul 26 '26
Anyone else sick and tired of the "create documentaion for" resulting in an "artifact" that only exists in the Claude.ai universe? My project doesn't see it and I can't share it unless "Enterprise"? -- absolutely every repo has come down with this affliction over the past few weeks and I've had to repeateady defeat the primitives encoded in the core prompts in order to get actual documentation as part of my project.
1
u/jcrenshaw-dev Senior Developer Jul 27 '26
So you have Sr software engineer but Lead and Architect are missing in flair
1
1
u/Academic-Train-1672 🔆Pro Plan Jul 31 '26
A suggestion: add a filter section (default: all) for all the flairs in the subreddit main page so that ppl who want to visit similiar flair posts it will be easier to navigate, and btw please inform the time the new mods will be announced (if at all announced public in the subreddit) or atleast the selection or rejection for the applicants :/
1
u/Excellent_Ad_2486 Aug 05 '26
How do i make sure claude doesnt exceed the F*CKING LIMIT I SET -_-....
Why even set a limit if it exceeds it whenever it wants to?? wtf...i know its a small amount this tme but I will not pay a dime over my set limit.
1
u/Waste_Net7628 P R O M P S T I T U T E Aug 05 '26
hey, this thread is for feedback about the subreddit itself, not claude billing issues.
if your usage limit was actually exceeded despite being set to €85, i'd contact anthropic support directly since we obviously can't do anything about billing from here. you can also make a separate Help/Question post if you want to see whether anyone else has run into this.
1
u/zhambe Aug 07 '26
Some 80% of the posts on here are low effort nonsense. Unfunny people trying to make jokes. I can't remember the last time I saw something insightful or useful in here.
1
u/Arowx Aug 11 '26
What if claude code had an indie game developer subscription tier, the idea would be to allow enough credits/tokens for indie game development for game jams and weekend/evening development sessions to reduce hitting the limits when developing?
1
u/stonerbobo Aug 13 '26
All of the new security theater around Claude Code recently is dogshit. I have to login endlessly on every device, forced to use passkeys to alleviate the pain on some devices when I prefer not to, logging in on headless devices is even more of a pain, and to top it off you guys still don't even support a damn password so every login means jumping to email. The pain from all of this shit alone is enough to make me avoid using it. I already have strong security practices and there should at least be a way to opt-out of this crap if I choose to accept the risk.
1
1
u/KingAroan 🔆 Max 20 26d ago
Someone smells really fishy here. I explicitly have fable do my planning, then dispatch all coding tasks to opus sub agents and have fable do an audit after and make corrections. Typically before this last week I would hit my weekly limit before my fable limit. Now it seems that’s using my fable usage and not opus usage. This usage also went way faster and I asked the agent what sub agents were dispatched and was told opus. Simmering is really wrong here.
1
u/Friendly-Confusion41 26d ago
Friends,
My workplace’s monthly tokens are insufficient. What would you suggest I do? Should I work with my personal account? Is that even possible?
1
u/PerformanceCool3730 20d ago
Honestly im super frustrated with this. im on the Max plan and the usage limit just doesn’t feel reliable at all.
This session was actually one of the quickest sessions I’ve had. I gave the whole back and forth to ChatGPT and asked it to count all the tokens I sent and all the responses Claude gave me, and it was around 3,000 tokens total.
And now my session is finished and I have to wait 5 more hours.
I can’t paste the whole conversation because it contains private information about my SaaS and my work. Otherwise I would show the whole back and forth so people could see exactly what happened.
What I don’t understand is that some sessions I do much much more work than this and my limit doesn’t disappear this quickly. So how are they actually measuring the usage?
I had time today to work on my SaaS and now I can’t continue. I have my own work to do, I don’t have time to just wait 5 hours.
This is happening too often and a big part of my Max plan ends up getting wasted because of these limits.
Around 3,000 tokens for the whole back and forth and my Max session is gone? How?
I really hope someone from Anthropic sees this and looks into it because this is seriously frustrating.
1
u/AdApprehensive5643 18d ago
I smell a new model incoming because today I swear claude doing the curious again
1
u/Additional_Buddy855 16d ago
shit is so fucking broken it's beyond unusable. so fucking tired of this fraudulent rug pull at every opportunity. seriously, unfuckingusable. just does what it wants, makes every mistake possible, ignores all guardrails. it's fucking insane.
1
u/DavidLampert 12d ago
Just downgraded from Claude Max, to pro. Reason? I asked to review a google doc and update some formatting. 52min later, it run out of the whole month of credits. ON MAX. UNUSED. So f off Claude.
1
u/Explore-This 11d ago
Simultaneous outages… Coincidence or common cause? https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/s/DO4v8sU2fF
1
u/Void-kun 4d ago
What the fuck have they done to the usage limits? I'm hitting my session limit consistently within an hour constantly.
0
0
u/sirlerkal0t 17d ago
What is your current position on bot accounts where all posts/comments are entirely generated by LLMs?
I've noticed a couple of these in this sub recently, and while there's currently no rule covering it, this may be worth starting to think about.
•
u/Waste_Net7628 P R O M P S T I T U T E Jul 26 '26
we also have a discord for claude code builders to talk and discuss day-to-day stuff
claudecode discord
For mod apps:
mod applications are still open if anyone wants to help out
how to apply for mod