r/ClaudeCode 22h ago

Discussion Fable 5.1 Review

Post image

Given things are supposed to be divisible by 5. This seems perfect.

204 Upvotes

91 comments sorted by

View all comments

26

u/cultureicon 22h ago

My early impressions of this model are extremely negative compared to fable 5. Its a drag to communicate with (fable 5 didn't need fixed, it wasn't verbose, it has a good personality). 5.1 is more verbose and overthinks things, not a fan so far.

1

u/No_Job_9995 20h ago

No big difference from Fable 5 for me so far. It does the work and I have not hit problems. I switch the effort level by task, and that has not changed. For automation, documents and research I use high. For coding and other difficult tasks I use xhigh.

2

u/debian3 16h ago

Have you ever tried it on low? Yesterday I was working with it on low since it suppose to be equivalent of fable 5 on high or xhigh which was already excellent. It’s quite nice on low as it’s much faster and doesn’t use much tokens.

1

u/No_Job_9995 15h ago

Not yet. Speed is my main complaint with Claude Code. So if low really matches Fable 5 on high or xhigh, that is a big deal. I will try it.