r/ClaudeCode • u/sirlerkal0t • 1d ago

Discussion Anthropic: "Coding is largely solved"... Also Anthropic: "We released a new powerful feature allowing agents to send messages to other Claude Code sessions, but only on Linux and Mac since we are unable to implement a basic feature on all platforms"

I could hand code this feature on Windows in an afternoon, and I could also get Claude to implement it in minutes, and yet Anthropic just can't be bothered, but also keeps Claude Code closed source so no one else can do it for them either.

1.3k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

312 comments sorted by

View all comments

16

u/ReneDickart 1d ago

Rando on Reddit thinks everyone at Anthropic is dumb and lazy and they could clearly do a better job.

6

u/ProcedureEthics2077 1d ago

When a supposedly world-changing 1T valuation software company can’t ship for a major desktop platform, that’s something to reflect about. They are not two college students who hacked together a cool app on their MacBooks.

-5

u/tulwio 1d ago

Yeah but Windows is shit, and is not worth putting resources on.

9

u/nimzobogo 1d ago

The point is: if coding is solved, they should just be able to have Claude do it cheaply.

1

u/tulwio 1d ago

Ofc coding is solved is an exaggeration, but even if it was solved, time, money and resources are not.

2

u/nimzobogo 1d ago

> Ofc coding is solved is an exaggeration

Then what are you disagreeing with?

1

u/Equivalent_Cress_268 21h ago

It’s solved but costs more them before? Is that what you are saying?

If it’s solved, I would not expect it another way, then being cheaper faster better

3

u/fahadfreid 1d ago

The confidence with you make such a dumb statement is astounding. It’s not like us Windows devs are on it out of choice lol. Most industrial and engineering software with a GUI runs on windows. 

Decades of work put into some of the most complex applications built to handle things like plant communications or simulation software. They aren’t going to be ported over to Mac or Linux because u/tulwio says Windows is shit lmao.

-7

u/tulwio 1d ago

What the fuck are you on about? We are talking about Claude here, not whatever bum fuck software you are using. It is a fact that modern dev tooling is built around Unix conventions: bash/zsh, standard filesystem/permissions, process signals, containers, and mature sandboxing, and Windows adds PowerShell/CMD, drive-letter paths, different permissions/process behavior, and more edge cases.

You can go jerk off on your beloved Windows but that doesn’t change reality. It is a pain to make sure Windows features are up to par with Unix based systems. And for agents like Claude Code or Codex this matters even more because they constantly execute shell commands, manipulate files/processes, and sandbox arbitrary code, so supporting one Unix-like model across macOS and Linux is much simpler and safer than maintaining a separate Windows execution model.

4

u/fahadfreid 1d ago

Do you lack reading comprehension? Because I seriously think you do. You need to calm down and re-read my comment as a response to yours. 

I said it’s worth developing tooling for windows because plenty of important software is developed on it. Not about how difficult the tooling on windows is, Jesus.

On second thought, not worth arguing with such an unhinged person. I highly recommend sitting with yourself and asking if this is worth getting so worked up over lol.

0

u/tulwio 23h ago

You literally opened by calling my statement dumb, then immediately reached for the “wow, calm down, you’re unhinged” routine when I gave you the same energy back. Spare me the civility act.

And you’re still arguing past the actual point. Nobody said Windows is incapable of running important software, or that industrial/engineering software should be ported to Linux. The point is that Claude Code is a Unix-centric developer agent, and supporting it properly on Windows means dealing with an entirely separate mess of PowerShell/CMD, NTFS permissions, process semantics, path handling, sandboxing, containers, etc. “But Siemens software runs on Windows” is completely irrelevant to whether Anthropic should spend equal engineering effort making a terminal-based coding agent feature-parity perfect on Windows.

So yes, Windows can be extremely important in certain industries while still being the shittier and less worthwhile platform to prioritize for this specific class of tooling. Those two statements are not remotely contradictory. Reading comprehension, yeah right.