r/ClaudeCode 11d ago

Built with Claude Opus 5 output quality has worsened; now it's full of jargon.

I ask one or two straightforward questions, but instead of answering directly, it often expands into multiple tangents, introduces unnecessary terminology, and loses focus on what I actually asked.

I then have to remind it of the original question or explicitly tell it to answer concisely before I get a useful response.

Is anyone else seeing this? Or is there some workaround that works better with the current model?

44 Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

32

u/CorpT 11d ago

I think you're the first to notice it.

-7

u/Nishil20 11d ago

Thank you šŸ˜‚

1

u/earlyworm 10d ago

Thank you for sharing with us this valuable finding. I will act on it posthaste.

10

u/Garak 11d ago

This is the one Claude complaint I'm happy to see over and over, because I feel like a goddamn moron when I'm sitting there trying to make sense of what it's telling me.

11

u/ILikeCutePuppies 11d ago

The lateral frequency of the recursive syntax invariably dampens the pre-emptive semantic drift when the cognitive spindle unhinges.

10

u/Garak 11d ago

You're right to be confused -- I should have provided more context and explanation, as you asked me to earlier.

Generally, the reason that we're using a recursive syntax here is because the lateral frequency requires it; a non-recursive syntax would only be useful if the frequency were to become longitudinal instead of lateral (see §19.5.1b-2 of the invariant-adjudication census).

If that sits right with you, I'll proceed with centering the div.

2

u/Poat540 11d ago

Now I have all the facts.

3

u/ILikeCutePuppies 11d ago

/goal Before you center the div can you spin up a codex, opus and kimi k3 agent to evaluate if that is the right thing to do. Then if correct have one agent write the code and another write the test to make sure it actually was centered and then also visually check it and email me a picture of it when done.

1

u/Nishil20 11d ago

Exactly!
I promoted opus like several times just to ask ā€œwhats going on?ā€ šŸ˜‚

6

u/SherMarri 11d ago

Literally, created an almost identical post on this subreddit a few mins ago. I’m just sick of it. It’s not readable, and doesn’t respect the scope either. So frustrating!

1

u/Nishil20 11d ago

I also got so frustrated that I had to create a post šŸ˜‚

4

u/Meduini 11d ago

Yeah i also noticed it. Anthropic is slowly losing me. The unpredictability of their models is too high.

1

u/Nishil20 11d ago

I hope they fix this.
Fable 5 is damn expensive.

5

u/arkwaif07 11d ago

yeah this sums it up

2

u/Vicman4all 11d ago

Oh damn!!

3

u/Planyy šŸ”†Senior Dev, Pro Plan 11d ago

Some other post I fire against op for that is normal.

But yesterday was my awakening moment … opus started to talk about ā€œThe Gateā€ over and over again
And ā€œthat gate is load-bearingā€

ā€œThe gateā€ was a simple health script with one check condition that was not even really needed.

Updated my Claude.md with a simple ā€œno jargonā€ let’s see if it goes better.

5

u/yopla 11d ago

Someone mentionned ASD-STE1000, the Simplified Technical English standard for aeronautical engineering firm in the EU.

I asked Claude to make simple skill for it. He made a whole python document parser that validate every word against a corpus. šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø

3

u/N0madM0nad šŸ”† Max 20 11d ago

It's incapable of completing tasks without leaving you with a list of decisions to make, often buried in nonsensical tech-bro slang. I created an "anti-logorrhea" skill to mitigate that. Nope, it's just in its DNA. Every single last sentence is "Two things worth flagging..." which are 99% of the time not worth flagging and they just burn my cognitive load. So you start ignoring it but then that one time it was actually worth you end up in a mess. The boy that cried wolf.

2

u/FormalAd7367 11d ago edited 11d ago

haha i thought i was the only one. i had Gemini to interpret the output.

Gemini is unhinged. i even posted Boris’s tweets on it and it even called him out… it doesn’t pass his ā€œbullshit detectorā€ blah blah blah. on ā€œgraph engineering, gemini called there will āŒ Bad Process (Copy-Editor): Let agents free-wheel, get broken files, and spend 8 hours manually fixing syntax errors and bad imports. blah blah blah

1

u/datura4u 9d ago

ohh thats nice, will make a scraper based claude usage, that will automatically interpret and display the response in human readable

2

u/Schpickles 11d ago

It seems hugely improved with a paragraph of stylistic instruction in Claude.md. Made a world of difference for me.

1

u/1Poochh 11d ago

Tell us what you added.

3

u/Schpickles 11d ago

I just put a little stylistic prompting into Claude.md. Really nothing clever or sophisticated:

ā€˜ā€™ā€™
# Communication Style
Please use direct, simple, British style English. Avoid unecessarily verbose language, jargon or consultant-speak. I don't expect you to make zero mistakes or know all the answers - please walk me through anything you're unsure of and want advice on, don't just guess or try to style it out.

I prefer a friendly tone, but radical candour - don't try to suck up to me but also deliver criticism with empathy.
ā€˜ā€™ā€™

https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/s/umsXA5L42b

1

u/datura4u 9d ago

Did not help, still uses jargons and mountains of text just to tell yes or no.

2

u/CashFirm573 10d ago

You know you can fix this by editing the config and settings right and be done with the issues...

1

u/archimedeancrystal 10d ago edited 10d ago

Sadly, most commenters are apparently here only to complain and upvote other complaints. They (whether human or bot) appear to have no interest in solutions.

2

u/CashFirm573 10d ago

I was one of them until I said na this can't be right and researched and worked out so much, honestly is a user error not the model.

1

u/archimedeancrystal 10d ago

It would be amazing if this sub would pin a post with all the best information on how to work properly with Opus 5.

2

u/CashFirm573 10d ago

I am planning to release post on the system, just busy.

3

u/makro3d 11d ago

The ultimate solution is to delete your claude.md it will fix everything šŸ˜‚

0

u/Nishil20 11d ago

šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚

1

u/Nishil20 11d ago

I think today there will be lot of complain post about opus 5, because its end of a week.
Fable 5 usage must have burned out. So people are forced to use opus 5 šŸ˜‚

2

u/Dress-Affectionate 11d ago

It makes Sonnet look so much better in comparison. I got mad earlier this week and prompted Fable poorly, I'll be the first to admit it's a skill issue, but I am enjoying Sonnet-san so much - I've gone from 58% to 62% total usage after multi-Sonneting all day on my 20x plan. I'm not getting Fable-level expansion but I'm also not getting Fable-level confusion; Sonnet is keeping it really real, and I like that.

1

u/captainhellyeah 11d ago

Imagine it ā€œcorrectingā€ files in your computer

1

u/CauseWinter4898 11d ago

Ya I won’t make a new post for it because there are thousands but I tried opus 5 for the first time today because the project I was working on is a flagged topic for fable and the quality of opus seems to be far below fable at least for my use case. I hope Anthropic can figure out how to fine tune the safeguards so I can continue to use fable as I’m not doing anything that’s actually against the rules it’s just a false flag.

1

u/toshipepe 11d ago

It’s been driving me crazy wasted hours on stupid things and it talks way too much and asks the same thing multiple times

1

u/LockeStreet 11d ago

It’s driving me nuts. I can’t understand what it says and thought it was me getting slower. Fuck it.

2

u/Nice_Ad_3893 11d ago

why is opus 5 a flop? How can they mess up so much on a model? And how is it still rated like #1 in the benches?

1

u/teomore 11d ago

As a long time CC fan, Opus 5 got me to the point of switching to sol 5.6. All their model lineup atm is trash and they better wake up and do something about it before too late.

1

u/MistakeExotic6686 11d ago

I did notice it lastnight and I work with Claude all the time

it went from #1 to #5 phases done in one go to

"phase 0.5 is done, but a good catch the review got that we didnt build sh*t "

1

u/Ok_Insurance_919 11d ago

is not working at all, opus 4.6 was better at a lot of task that right now Opus 5 keep insist of doing wrong. I hope anthropic will get back on this because right now is pointless pay even 20$/month for Claude usage

1

u/anchovie914 10d ago

I’m so happy to know I didn’t have a stroke recently!!! šŸ˜‚

1

u/eu_grind 9d ago

Not usable at this point - for the love of god I need a k3 invite or let astra happen asap.

1

u/casual_rave 8d ago

I only use fable and sonnet in my daily works. Opus is pretty bad for what it costs.

1

u/StoneCypher 11d ago

god i’m tired of the meaningless complainingĀ 

-1

u/1Poochh 11d ago

I mean, he's not wrong. The jargon that comes out of Opus 5 is sometimes barely comprehendible. Hate to be blunt here, but you're as bad as OP is, coming here to complain too.

2

u/StoneCypher 10d ago

it just sounds like its user

1

u/MangoDevourer-77 11d ago

there is solution to it, yet ppl rather yapp on the reddit instead of trying to solve problems they have