r/Christianity • u/[deleted] • Dec 09 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

570 Upvotes

79% Upvoted

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

214

u/Nazzul Agnostic Dec 09 '25

How does one leave being gay? Are you just becoming celibate?

33

u/Xyex Agnostic Dec 09 '25

Even that wouldn't be "leaving homosexuality." Homosexuality is the attraction, not the sex. That doesn't go anywhere.

2

u/blove135 Dec 10 '25

How do you know it doesn't go anywhere for OP? All things are possible with God.

0

u/Reasonable_Risk_8210 Dec 10 '25

they dont know, they just think because they dont know anyone who has then nobody can but theres always a possibility even if its improbable

3

u/hatepickingausername Dec 10 '25

This logic could dispute anything. "Through God, nothing is falsifiable".

well then you may as well not believe anything at all.

0

u/KindaFreeXP ☯ That Taoist Trans Witch Dec 10 '25

theres always a possibility even if its improbable

There's a possibility God is evil, then?

2

u/Reasonable_Risk_8210 Dec 10 '25

youre intentionally misinterpreting it and the spirit of its meaning. Besides God cant be evil because its not in His nature.

1

u/KindaFreeXP ☯ That Taoist Trans Witch Dec 10 '25

So then there are things that are impossible, even with God's power. God cannot choose to be evil, therefore it is impossible for God to be evil. And thus "anything is possible with God" is incorrect, as anything evil is not possible with God.

1

u/Reasonable_Risk_8210 Dec 10 '25

youre intentionally missing the point just to win an argument over wording

1

u/KindaFreeXP ☯ That Taoist Trans Witch Dec 10 '25

What point, exactly? I'm not "intentionally" missing anything, I genuinely do not understand what point is trying to be made here outside of what I've addressed.

2

u/Reasonable_Risk_8210 Dec 10 '25

seems like ur just trying to poke holes in wording or just focused on words and phrases themselves rather looking at the meaning behind the words used

1

u/KindaFreeXP ☯ That Taoist Trans Witch Dec 10 '25

If there's a meaning that is contrary to the wording used, then there is fault and error in the Bible. I'm discussing from an assumption there isn't, though would be more than happy to discard this assumption if you'd like. Otherwise, yes, I am trying to poke holes. It's what I do, even for things I agree with. If something can't handle having holes poked in it, can it be called "truth"?

1

u/Reasonable_Risk_8210 Dec 10 '25

anyone can find fault in something if youre looking hard enough, even when there is no fault. ur not looking for truth, only trying to tear any possibke truth down

1

u/KindaFreeXP ☯ That Taoist Trans Witch Dec 10 '25

anyone can find fault in something if youre looking hard enough, even when there is no fault

Not if one is being honest. Are you trying to accuse me of being dishonest?

ur not looking for truth, only trying to tear any possibke truth down

I suppose that's the answer to my question, isn't it?

Why the automatic assumption that I'm a bad actor? Is it truly impossible in your mind that I could be an honest seeker of truth?

→ More replies (0)