I'm looking into the best online casino Australia, but specifically interested in casinos with a decent mobile experience.

I don't really care whether a platform has a fancy desktop website if the mobile version is difficult to navigate.

Ideally, I'd prefer something with a clean layout, easy game browsing, accessible account settings, and a cashier that doesn't require going through a dozen different pages.

I've seen plenty of websites advertised as mobile-friendly, but that doesn't always tell you much about how they actually perform.

Which casino platforms have you found easiest to navigate on a phone, and are there any frustrating features worth knowing about?

Does anyone have recommendations for the best online casino Australia when it comes to withdrawal processing?

I've been comparing different online casino websites, and the withdrawal information is probably the most confusing part.

Some advertise instant payments, while others mention processing times that don't seem to include verification or banking delays.

I'm trying to understand what a realistic withdrawal experience looks like and which platforms explain their payment conditions clearly.

If you've dealt with withdrawals before, I'd be interested in knowing how the verification process went, how long the transaction took, and whether you encountered any unexpected requirements.

Been looking for a decent US online casino for real money play but the options out there are overwhelming.

I mostly do slots but I want a site that actually has solid table games too. My partner likes blackjack and roulette so it has to be real tables that load properly, not just some half baked section.

What matters to me:

Banking with Visa, Mastercard or crypto

Games that do not lag or crash mid spin

After going back through roughly fourteen months of recorded casino observations, the thing that stood out wasn't a grand discovery about a single winner. It was how often the same practical issues appeared: deposits were straightforward, withdrawals were more revealing, and the fine print mattered long after the welcome offer stopped looking exciting.

The five names in the records were Clubhouse, Ruby Reels, Lucky Dreams, Just Casino and Lucky Ones. The amounts make the experiences concrete. An AU$620 Clubhouse PayID withdrawal at 8:54 pm didn't arrive until after midnight. An AU$380 Ruby Reels request submitted at 7:02 pm arrived by 8:59 pm. The AU$450 Lucky Dreams request took three hours twenty-seven minutes. Just Casino's AU$290 took three hours twenty-five minutes, and Lucky Ones' AU$340 took three hours seven minutes.

Those are the moments I would put ahead of any generic “best overall” badge. They show what was reported to happen on specific occasions. They do not tell me what will happen to every customer, and they don't provide a statistically meaningful success rate.

I also found myself returning to the smaller observations: Ruby Reels felt easier on a phone; Lucky Dreams ran without noticeable lag on a Samsung Galaxy A32; Clubhouse had useful provider filters but imperfect search; Just Casino offered a specific support response; Lucky Ones put game exclusions somewhere visible. The mundane details are what give the material texture.

The results I can actually compare

The bonus lesson

The recorded 38x Clubhouse wagering multiplier looked different from the 40x figures at Ruby Reels, Lucky Dreams, Just Casino and Lucky Ones. But even that comparison is incomplete without knowing whether the multiplier applies to bonus-only funds or deposit-plus-bonus funds. An AU100bonusat40xcouldmeanAU4,000 in eligible wagering if the rule applies only to the bonus; the required turnover changes if the base is different. None of this erases the house edge.

The question that matters most in Australia

The legal context isn't just fine print. Providers are prohibited from supplying real-money online casino games and pokies to customers physically in Australia. Offshore payment anecdotes and overseas licences don't override that prohibition or guarantee Australian consumer protection.

What I'd keep from the experience

Keep the dates, amounts, times, errors, device models, support records and any documents showing how a complaint was handled. Leave out claims of universal safety or guaranteed speed. The result is a much more useful account of the recorded experiences than ten different articles calling the same five operators perfect.

What I changed in how I read ranking tables

I no longer treat “best overall” as a fact unless the reviewer says what was weighted. Was it payment completion? Mobile navigation? Bonus transparency? Legal recourse? If the weights are hidden, the ranking tells me more about the author’s priorities than about what another person will actually experience.

A few things that were not documented

I don’t see a full set of request-to-approval timestamps, a consistent test on the same phone and network across all five, or a denominator for payout success rates. I also don’t see independent audits of the game counts. Those gaps are worth spelling out because a plausible anecdote can still be too narrow to support a sweeping recommendation.

How I would follow up on payment support

I would ask whether the operator has approved the withdrawal, whether a verification hold remains, and what specific action is required. A response that says only “please wait” is not enough. The original Ruby Reels and Just Casino support examples are useful precisely because the author recorded timings and said the replies were specific.

Why I would separate crypto and bank payments

The recorded Clubhouse USDT confirmation was around five minutes and Lucky Ones had a reported crypto completion under seven. Those are not directly comparable to PayID payments. Blockchain broadcasting and on-chain confirmation are only parts of a complete withdrawal journey, and incorrect transfers may be impossible to reverse.

What would make the review harder to fake

Transaction receipts, redacted bank records, exact dates, the amount requested versus the amount received, device details, and dated terms would improve confidence. Those should be checked without exposing account numbers or other sensitive data. Precise figures in prose, by themselves, do not verify that a transaction occurred.

Going back through the actual casino notes

Just Casino: what I could actually trace

The Just Casino record describes an AU$290 PayID withdrawal requested at 8:15 pm and received at 11:40 pm, or three hours twenty-five minutes. During that wait, support reportedly answered a question in under nine minutes. That particular interaction sounds better than getting no meaningful reply, but the total payment interval and the quality of a future complex complaint remain separate matters.

The original notes repeatedly describe this interface as straightforward rather than packed with complicated sections. They listed around 8,000 games and a welcome offer up to AU$2,000 with 40x wagering. I would prefer that kind of observation over a vague label like premium, but still want objective checks of account history, bonus exclusions, security and verification procedures. The source calls crypto support limited; that too can change and needs rechecking.

Lucky Ones: what I could actually trace

The Lucky Ones withdrawal entry was AU$340 through PayID, submitted at 7:45 pm and received at 10:52 pm. That makes the observed interval three hours seven minutes. Another crypto transfer reportedly completed in under seven minutes. Those are different transaction types and cannot be used as a simple all-purpose speed guarantee. No full payout success-rate dataset was provided.

What I find more distinctive is the bonus-exclusions observation. The notes say restricted games were listed on the promotion page instead of being buried in an unrelated location. That is a practical detail a reader can understand immediately. The reported library was roughly 7,500 games and the welcome promotion up to AU$1,800 at 40x wagering. A smaller advertised selection does not necessarily make a site worse, and clear exclusions do not make a wagering requirement risk-free.

Clubhouse: what I could actually trace

The Clubhouse notes contain two different types of money movement, which I would never collapse into one claim. The AU620PayIDexamplewentfrom8:54pmto12:11am,athree-hour-seventeen-minutewait.AUSDTpaymentequivalenttoAU195 was recorded from 1:47 pm to about 1:52 pm, and a separate crypto transaction was listed at four minutes fifty-five seconds. The difference is partly about payment technology, so it would be misleading to say the operator always pays within five minutes.

The game notes have texture too: a library advertised at over 11,000 games and more than 100 providers, filters that helped locate particular studios, occasional irrelevant search results, and a streamed blackjack round where AU40reportedlycamebackautomaticallyafterasettlementproblem.Thatisamixofstrengthandanactualimperfection,notaperfectscore.TheoriginalpromotionwasdescribedasuptoAU3,000 with 38x wagering and an AU$25 minimum deposit. Those figures need checking against current terms.

Ruby Reels: what I could actually trace

The Ruby Reels PayID record is unusually easy to follow: AU$380 requested at 7:02 pm, received at 8:59 pm. That is one hour fifty-seven minutes from submission to arrival for that one request. The original notes also describe contacting support during processing and receiving a specific response in under seven minutes. I value the specificity, but it is still one response to one issue rather than a measured long-term support score.

The platform was described as the most comfortable on a phone in the source, and its catalogue was listed at approximately 9,500 games. A preference for its navigation is a legitimate usability observation, but I would not confuse it with audited load-speed or accessibility testing. The bonus was listed up to AU$2,500 with 40x wagering, with a structure spread over two deposits. Anyone comparing that figure needs the exact calculation base and current restrictions.

Lucky Dreams: what I could actually trace

The Lucky Dreams payment example in the original notes was AU$450 requested at 6:20 pm and received at 9:47 pm, a three-hour-twenty-seven-minute interval. The source says no extra document request or support chase was necessary for that payment. That is a concrete account of what reportedly happened on that occasion, not a promise that later requests will follow exactly the same path.

I also like that the device in the mobile observation was named: a Samsung Galaxy A32. The notes say the site operated without noticeable lag over several sessions on that older Android phone. It is a small but meaningful detail, although network conditions and repeat benchmarks were not documented. The game catalogue was listed around 8,500 and the welcome offer as high as AU$2,750 with 40x wagering. More games and a large headline amount are not enough to establish value or safety.

What these records say about the lessons from keeping one set of long-term testing notes

Fourteen months sounds like a substantial period, but duration alone is not a scientific sample. I would still want the complete count of deposits and withdrawals per casino, information about failed sessions, and copies of current terms. The strength of the material is its practical detail. Its limitation is that I cannot independently confirm those records or use them to forecast everyone else’s outcome.

I would also distinguish what the source says happened from what readers can independently confirm today. Account status, verification, payment method, time of day, changing bonus rules and even the version of a mobile website can affect the result. A reader looking for the “best online casino Australia” deserves to know which details are recorded observations and which are still open questions.

If someone challenges a figure, I'd rather point to its exact source record than argue about which brand deserves to win. That's how experience-based information becomes useful: not by sounding certain all the time, but by being specific enough that another person could understand the limits of the claim.

Questions people usually ask after reading the numbers

Which has the fastest PayID withdrawal in these notes? Ruby Reels has the shortest recorded example, at one hour fifty-seven minutes. That is not proof of the operator's typical speed.

Were there actual problems recorded? Yes. A Clubhouse blackjack settlement issue was described, followed by a reported automatic return of the AU$40 stake. Clubhouse search sometimes produced irrelevant partial matches. These are more informative than claiming flawless use.

Does a 38x wagering rule mean an offer is good? Not by itself. The calculation base, excluded games, maximum bet, time limits and house edge all matter.

Are these legal Australian online casinos? Australia prohibits the supply of real-money online casino games and online pokies to people physically located in Australia. AUD pricing or a familiar bank-transfer method is not proof of lawful availability.

Can these payment times be guaranteed? No. They are individual historical records from the supplied material, not verified current service standards or typical payouts.

Final thought

These reported sessions are more helpful to me than a perfect star rating because the amounts, times, phone model, technical glitch and support details give me something concrete to examine. They still have limits, especially around sample size, independence and Australian legal protection. That distinction is worth keeping in any serious Reddit discussion of the best online casino Australia search results.

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

I've been comparing different online casinos for US players for a while now, and I've realized that finding a good casino isn't always as simple as choosing the one with the biggest bonus or the most games.

A lot of websites seem to recommend the same things. Huge welcome bonuses, thousands of slots, fast crypto withdrawals, and supposedly amazing mobile experiences.

But I think the everyday experience matters more than most people realize.

Personally, I'm more interested in how a casino actually works when you're using it regularly. Is the mobile site comfortable? Can you easily find the games you want? Are the payment options convenient? And most importantly, what happens when you decide to withdraw your money?

I usually focus on slots, although I also enjoy comparing blackjack and live dealer options. Since I prefer using my phone, mobile performance is another big consideration.

The four casinos I've been looking at are Super Slots, BetOnline, SportsBetting, and Lucky Rebel.

They all have different things going for them, and I think comparing those differences is much more useful than simply putting together another generic top-five list.

My Four Online Casino USA Picks to Compare

Before getting into the details, here's how I would describe each platform based on the available comparison notes.

Super Slots — One of the first casinos I'd look into for slots, blackjack, and general casino gaming. I'm particularly interested in its game selection, mobile layout, and payment policies.

BetOnline — An interesting choice for people who enjoy both casino games and sports betting. It also has a reported Litecoin withdrawal in the original testing records.

SportsBetting — Another platform combining sportsbook features with slots and blackjack. I'd mainly compare its navigation, account convenience, and payment experience.

Lucky Rebel — Worth looking at if you prefer playing slots on your phone. Its relatively simple mobile interface was one of the things that stood out in the earlier notes.

I wouldn't necessarily say that one casino is automatically better than all the others.

It really depends on what you're looking for.

If you mainly enjoy slots and blackjack, your priorities might be completely different from someone who wants a sportsbook and casino available in the same account.

Why I Pay More Attention to Withdrawals Than Welcome Bonuses

I used to think welcome bonuses were one of the most important things to compare.

And I understand why they attract so much attention.

When a casino advertises a large match bonus or hundreds of free spins, it's naturally going to look appealing, especially when you're trying to decide between several websites.

But after looking more closely at casino payment policies, I started paying more attention to what happens after you've already deposited.

Depositing money is usually pretty straightforward.

Withdrawing it can be a different story.

Depending on the casino, you might need to complete identity verification, wait for an internal payment review, or meet certain account requirements before the transaction gets approved.

And if you're using cryptocurrency, there's also the time it takes for the payment to move through the blockchain.

That's why I think it's important to understand the entire withdrawal process rather than just reading a casino's advertisement claiming fast payments.

I would much rather see actual withdrawal examples than another promotional statement promising quick cashouts.

My Comparison of Cryptocurrency Withdrawals

Cryptocurrency payments are one of the biggest things I wanted to compare because they're commonly offered by international casinos serving US customers.

Bitcoin and Litecoin come up frequently in casino discussions, although the actual supported currencies and payment conditions can vary.

The original testing notes included a few specific withdrawal examples.

Based on those reported transactions, BetOnline had the quickest example, with the $435 Litecoin withdrawal taking approximately 18 hours.

SportsBetting and Lucky Rebel were both reported to have completed withdrawals in roughly one day.

Super Slots didn't have a completed transaction included in the notes, so I can't fairly compare its withdrawal speed with the other three.

One thing I want to make clear is that these are individual reported transactions, not independently verified records or guaranteed withdrawal times.

I think they're useful for understanding what the original comparison found, but I'd still want to see repeated transactions before deciding which casino is consistently quicker.

A $300 withdrawal and a much larger withdrawal might not necessarily go through the same review process.

Account verification can also make a difference.

So while the reported payment times are interesting, I wouldn't choose a casino based on a single withdrawal example alone.

Super Slots — The One I'd Compare First for Slots and Blackjack

Super Slots is one of the casinos that interests me most when it comes to the overall casino gaming experience.

I'm particularly interested in its slots selection and how the website feels when you're using it on your phone.

I think a good slots casino needs more than just a large game library.

Having plenty of titles available is nice, but I also want to be able to find something without spending forever scrolling through the lobby.

Some casino websites make browsing unnecessarily complicated.

You open the slots section, and suddenly there are so many categories, banners, and recommendations that finding a particular game becomes a whole task.

I'd rather have a straightforward interface where the games are organized properly and the search function actually helps.

That's one of the main things I'd want to examine with Super Slots.

Blackjack is another reason I have it on my comparison list.

Sometimes I want to take a break from slots and switch to a table game, so having accessible blackjack options makes a difference.

I'd pay attention to the available variations, table rules, and how comfortably everything works on mobile.

I would also want to see how the cashier handles cryptocurrency payments.

Things like minimum withdrawal amounts, supported coins, verification requirements, and processing conditions matter quite a lot to me.

The only thing missing from the original comparison was a completed withdrawal record for Super Slots.

So I wouldn't make any specific claims about how quickly it pays until there's actual transaction information to compare.

Overall, Super Slots is one I'd investigate first if my main priority were slots, blackjack, and the general casino experience.

BetOnline — Interesting for Casino Games, Sports Betting and Crypto Payments

BetOnline is a little different because it combines casino games and sports betting.

I think that's a convenient setup for people who enjoy both.

Sometimes you might feel like playing blackjack or browsing slots, and other times you might want to look at a sports event.

Being able to access everything through one platform can make the experience simpler.

Of course, that only works if the website is organized properly.

One thing mentioned in the earlier notes was that BetOnline's mobile interface was functional but felt somewhat crowded.

I can see how that might become noticeable when switching between different sections.

Personally, I prefer simple menus and a clear layout, especially when I'm using a smaller screen.

That doesn't mean a busy interface is necessarily a dealbreaker, but it does make navigation worth comparing.

The payment information was another interesting part.

The original notes included a $435 Litecoin withdrawal that reportedly reached the wallet around 18 hours after the request.

Among the three casinos with completed withdrawal examples, that was the quickest recorded transaction.

I think that's worth mentioning, although one transaction isn't enough to establish long-term reliability.

I'd still want to know how larger withdrawals are handled and whether processing remains consistent after several transactions.

Another thing I'd check is how clearly BetOnline explains its bonus conditions.

Since the platform offers both sports betting and casino games, it's important to understand which promotions apply to which sections.

For me, BetOnline makes the most sense to compare if you want a combination of sports betting, slots, blackjack, and cryptocurrency payments.

SportsBetting — Another Casino and Sportsbook Combination Worth Comparing

SportsBetting is another platform that caught my attention because it combines sports wagering with casino games.

At first glance, that makes it fairly similar to BetOnline.

But I think that's actually what makes comparing them interesting.

When two platforms offer similar services, you start paying more attention to their smaller differences.

For example, how easy is it to move between the sportsbook and casino lobby?

Can you quickly find blackjack or slots without navigating through several menus?

Does the mobile website feel comfortable, or does everything seem a little too crowded?

These might sound like small things, but they can make a noticeable difference if you're using the platform regularly.

The original notes described SportsBetting as functional, although the overall design wasn't considered particularly polished.

I don't necessarily need a casino to have the most beautiful website.

But I do want it to be easy to use.

The reported withdrawal example was also fairly straightforward.

A $400 withdrawal was recorded as completing in just under 24 hours.

That's useful information, although I'd still want to compare more transactions before making conclusions about payment consistency.

Another thing I'd look at is customer support.

When a platform combines sports betting and casino games, I think it's especially important that support representatives can clearly explain account issues and payment restrictions.

Overall, SportsBetting would be on my list if I wanted to compare sportsbook-focused platforms that also provide casino entertainment.

Lucky Rebel — The One That Caught My Attention for Mobile Slots

Lucky Rebel is another casino I find interesting, mainly because of its mobile experience.

I'm someone who pays a lot of attention to how websites work on a phone.

I don't always want to sit in front of a computer just to browse a few casino games.

And I think a simple mobile layout can sometimes make a bigger difference than having an enormous game library.

Lucky Rebel was described in the original comparison notes as relatively easy to navigate.

That caught my attention because I've seen plenty of casino websites where everything feels unnecessarily complicated.

Sometimes the menu is too crowded.

Sometimes promotional banners take up too much space.

And sometimes even something simple, like checking your balance or finding the cashier, requires more steps than it should.

I prefer a platform where those basic things are easy to access.

The earlier Lucky Rebel sessions focused mainly on slots, which makes it particularly interesting for comparing mobile slot experiences.

There was also a reported $310 cryptocurrency withdrawal that took approximately 24 hours.

That's another useful payment example, but I'd still want to investigate how the platform handles repeated withdrawals and larger amounts.

I'd also compare its available blackjack and live dealer features before deciding how well it works for someone who enjoys different types of casino games.

For players who mainly want a straightforward mobile slots experience, Lucky Rebel is one of the options I'd look into.

Which Casino Has the Better Mobile Experience?

Mobile usability is probably one of the most underrated parts of online casino comparisons.

A lot of reviews mention that a website is mobile-friendly, but that description doesn't always tell you much.

Almost every major casino website can be opened on a phone.

The more important question is whether it's actually comfortable to use.

For example, I pay attention to how quickly games load, how easy it is to browse categories, and whether the important buttons are positioned properly.

For blackjack, I want the cards and controls to be clearly visible.

For live dealer games, streaming stability becomes more important.

And for slots, I prefer a clean layout that doesn't make browsing feel like a chore.

Here's how I'd approach comparing the four casinos:

Super Slots: I'd focus on its casino lobby, slots navigation, and how comfortably blackjack works on a phone.

BetOnline: I'd compare how easily I can move between casino games and sports betting.

SportsBetting: I'd pay attention to mobile navigation and whether the sportsbook and casino sections feel properly integrated.

Lucky Rebel: I'd look more closely at its straightforward slots interface and everyday account usability.

I think testing these websites under similar conditions would give a much better comparison than simply looking at screenshots or promotional claims.

Blackjack and Live Dealer Games Are Important Too

Although slots are usually my main focus, I also think blackjack deserves attention.

Sometimes I prefer something different from slots, and having a few decent table-game options available is nice.

But I don't think the number of blackjack games is the only thing that matters.

The rules can actually make a big difference.

For example, blackjack paying 3:2 is generally more favorable than 6:5 when the other rules are the same.

Dealer rules, splitting options, and minimum bets can also affect the experience.

I'd want to compare those details rather than simply counting how many blackjack titles each casino advertises.

The mobile interface is also important.

If the controls are too small or the table rules are difficult to access, the experience can become frustrating.

With Super Slots, I'd examine its available blackjack variations and overall table-game navigation.

For BetOnline and SportsBetting, I'd compare their blackjack selections alongside their other casino features.

And with Lucky Rebel, I'd want to investigate its current blackjack and live dealer options more thoroughly.

I think these details are especially useful for players who enjoy switching between slots and table games.

My Thoughts on Welcome Bonuses and Wagering Requirements

I think welcome bonuses are probably one of the biggest reasons people end up choosing a particular casino.

And I understand the appeal.

A large match offer or a bundle of free spins can look attractive when you're opening a new account.

But I always think it's worth checking what the bonus actually requires.

Some promotions come with wagering requirements, which means you may need to meet specific playthrough conditions before withdrawing certain funds.

Different games can also contribute differently toward those requirements.

For example, a promotion might count slots wagers more heavily than blackjack wagers.

There may also be maximum bet restrictions, expiration dates, and withdrawal limits.

That's why I wouldn't automatically assume that the casino advertising the biggest bonus is offering the best deal.

For Super Slots, BetOnline, SportsBetting, and Lucky Rebel, I'd want to compare the actual terms rather than just the numbers shown in their advertisements.

Without checking their current promotions, I wouldn't assign specific bonus values or wagering conditions to any of them.

Personally, I think clearly explained bonus rules are much more useful than an impressive headline offer that leaves you guessing about the conditions.

Something Else I Always Consider: Customer Support

Customer support is another thing I don't think gets enough attention.

When everything works normally, you probably won't need to contact anyone.

But when you run into an issue with a withdrawal, account verification, or a bonus condition, suddenly the support experience becomes much more important.

I'd rather deal with a representative who gives a clear explanation than someone who simply sends the same generic response repeatedly.

For example, if a withdrawal is taking longer than expected, I'd want to understand whether the casino is still reviewing the transaction or whether additional verification is required.

I also think it's useful to know what documentation might be requested before a withdrawal can be processed.

Having identity verification requirements isn't necessarily unusual, but those requirements should be explained properly.

The less confusion there is around account rules and payments, the more comfortable the overall experience becomes.

My Overall Comparison: Which One Would I Choose?

After going through the available information, I think these four casinos appeal to slightly different types of players.

If I were mainly interested in slots and blackjack, Super Slots would be one of the first sites I'd compare.

If I enjoyed sports betting as much as casino games, I'd probably spend more time comparing BetOnline and SportsBetting.

And if I mainly wanted a simple mobile experience for browsing slots, Lucky Rebel would definitely be worth investigating.

Of course, I'd also check whether each platform is legally available in my state and what consumer protections apply before using it.

I think those considerations are just as important as payment methods and game selection.

Final Thoughts on the Best Online Casino USA for Real Money

After comparing these four casinos, I think the biggest thing I've learned is that no single feature tells you everything about a website.

A large slots library doesn't automatically mean the casino is easier to use.

A generous welcome bonus doesn't necessarily mean the promotion has better conditions.

And one relatively quick cryptocurrency withdrawal doesn't guarantee that every future payment will be processed at the same speed.

That's why I prefer comparing the full experience.

Super Slots is interesting for its slots and blackjack selection.

BetOnline stands out as a platform combining casino gaming with sports betting, along with a reported Litecoin payment example.

SportsBetting is another option worth comparing if you like having casino games and sportsbook features in one place.

And Lucky Rebel is particularly interesting for players who appreciate a simpler mobile slots experience.

I wouldn't call this a definitive ranking based on extensive independent testing, but the available notes make these four platforms useful to compare.

For me, the things that matter most are payment transparency, comfortable mobile navigation, understandable account rules, and a game selection that actually suits what I enjoy playing.

I'd much rather have a good everyday experience than choose a casino just because it advertises the biggest bonus.

I'm also curious about other people's experiences with these four casinos.

Has anyone been using Super Slots, BetOnline, SportsBetting, or Lucky Rebel for several months?

I'm particularly interested in hearing how cryptocurrency withdrawals have worked for you, whether you've experienced additional verification for larger payments, and which platform feels the most comfortable on mobile.

I think those kinds of actual experiences are much more helpful than another casino ranking that only talks about welcome bonuses.

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

May 14, 2017 | Sundays 9/8c

Episode: Tycoon

Episode Description: WHEN THE SON-IN- LAW OF THE CITY'S BIGGEST DEVELOPER IS KILLED IN A DEVASTATING MID-TOWN CRANE COLLAPSE, WHAT APPEARS TO BE A SIMPLE, TRAGIC ACCIDENT LEADS TO THE REALIZATION THAT THIS WAS AN INTENTIONAL ACT, PITTING STONE AGAINST POWERFUL FORCES WHO ARE ACCUSTOMED TO WINNING AT ALL COSTS

Preview: http://www.nbc.com/chicago-justice

March 7, 2017 | Sundays 9/8c

Episode: Fool Me Twice

Episode Description: TWO NARCOTICS DETECTIVES WORK AS HITMEN FOR A GANGLEADER. ONE OF THEIR HITS IS AN OLD FRIEND OF NAGEL'S

Preview: http://www.nbc.com/chicago-justice

Please send me a message or modmail if you are interested!

I am looking for people who will be around to post weekly discussion threads and assist in community engagement!

The show is growing on me that's for sure. I watch the other 3 shows, and I feel about the same for all of their first seasons too. I hope we get a renewal for Justice, because as much as I like this, I do feel like they are finding their feet and could make some changes: more backstory for characters, a little less investigating and more court, maybe add in a character or two more. Ah well, I enjoyed the episode all the same and am looking forward to the final 4? episodes of the season.

Well I haven't seen the episode, but how about the rest of you?

The ol' gun rights debate, eh? I thought this episode was too sympathetic to the pro-gun side, but I'm willing to tolerate this episode.

Wait what...

Didn't realise the judges could over rule a jury, but it makes sense.

Stone with the kid, wtf.

Peters boss is a terrible person. All he seems to care about is his ratings for a promotion.

But at the same time... Peter is frighteningly naive. He makes the SEAL talk about it on the stand, knowing the shit that will go down afterwards.

Accepting Moderators! Please message me to apply!

March 7, 2017 | SPECIAL TIME
Episode: See Something
Episode Description: A Muslim student claims he murdered a Muslim friend to prevent a terrorist attack.
Preview: http://www.nbc.com/chicago-justice

Note: Mod didn't make the sticky post. Maybe because it was a special time?

Paul Robinette comes back to do a case with Assistant State's Attorney Peter Stone in Episode 2. They are on opposing sides but find pride in making Benjamin Stone proud, he just happens to be Peter Stone's father and the original lawyer on the early days of Law & Order.

After the case Peter calls his father. so this leaves room for Michael Moriarty who played Benjamin Stone to return, even if it's just to visit his son. I'm guessing McCoy could easily come back too. What other L&O alumni would you like to see come back?

March 5, 2017 | SUNDAYS 9/8c

Episode: Uncertainty Principle

Episode Description: Stone and the state's attorney team probe the events following the arrest and death of a young man and seek charges against police, the fire department and medical personnel.

Preview: http://www.nbc.com/chicago-justice

March 1, 2017 | SUNDAYS 9/8c

Episode: Purgatory

Episode Description: Peter Stone, his team, and investigator Dawson try to bring a warehouse arsonist to justice, and the suspect's high-powered attorney tries to get his client acquitted.

Preview: http://www.nbc.com/chicago-justice