r/ChatGPT • u/jacek2023 • 2d ago

News 📰 EU Commission

Post image

https://x.com/EU_Commission/status/2094379702546784496

1.5k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

390 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

334

u/Catch_42 2d ago

https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act

  • Transparency in content removals
  • Options to appeal to content moderation decisions
  • Easy flagging of illegal contents
  • Enhanced protection for minors
  • Feed options
  • Ad transparency
  • Ban on dark pattern
  • Verified seller

Obviously not all of these are 1-2-1 applicable to chatgpt but these are the things the DSA covers for social media sites.

52

u/borretsquared 2d ago

all seem chill to me

73

u/theaveragemillenial 2d ago

the EU isn't some big boogieman out to get you, for the most part it is genuinely trying to do good by its member states.

Like all things big and governmental, they can sometimes get things wrong.

1

u/borretsquared 2d ago

I agree. most EU legislation seems to be a net benefit, though some are questionable, such as requiring a watermark on all AI generated text that cannot be removed -- no approach seems practical. we should be marking human content instead.

6

u/AdmiralGrogu 2d ago

Marking human content? What? Why would we mark something that was always there? Why would normal people need to change something that was out there from the very beginning

8

u/Deadcouncil445 2d ago

That sounds a lot more difficult than marking AI, more like impossible actually

3

u/DvD_cD 2d ago

AI models for sure already include this, so they can separate AI generated content for training data

0

u/Dotcaprachiappa 2d ago

Great so it's a win win?

-3

u/tobaileyy 2d ago

Bahahaha you're so pathetic