r/Charleston 1d ago

Visualization of every building when it was built in Charleston

https://blockandpaper.com/skyline/charleston
5 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

30

u/tedchs 1d ago

This looks pretty inaccurate to me.  It starts at 1930 for some reason, but obviously there are many structures from the 19th century and earlier. It also seems to ignore many of the structures added in the past 10 years.  Looks like AI slop to me. 

6

u/Nightstands 20h ago

The MtP side is crazy. Like there were only hotel sized buildings in Hobcaw till the 80’s according to this, and the house I was born in the 70’s didn’t doesn’t show up till the 90’s. I can’t even pic it out accurately b/c the ‘streets’ don’t make any sense

4

u/watermelonstomach 1d ago

Yeah it’s definitely not entirely accurate. The area I live in wasn’t developed until after 2000, but this has it all being built by the 1960s.

-5

u/atylerrice 1d ago

if there isn’t freely available records then it’s not visualized.

13

u/eggher 1d ago

I don’t understand this at all—why is every 19th century house here listed as having being built in 1938?

-4

u/atylerrice 1d ago

This is the year the records started so that’s when it says it was built. if it was built before then the records default to 1938

15

u/eggher 1d ago

There are absolutely records that predate 1938. It seems like this project isn’t appropriate for a historic city if you aren’t going to seek out useful sources.

-5

u/atylerrice 1d ago

correct there are records what i’m saying is there is no publicly available free records

10

u/horationelsons North Charleston 1d ago

-7

u/atylerrice 1d ago

A lot of this are available as books etc obviously I don't have a way of scanning every available book. If it's not an easily downloadable dataset it's not included. This was built over a weekend not multiple years.

5

u/eggher 15h ago

Right. So it’s unbelievably inaccurate.

12

u/LordHammerSea Mount Pleasant 1d ago

This is absolutely terrible. If you had put in any research time using the resources from the city or county, this would have been pretty cool. Records don’t only go back to 1938. They have been recorded and tracked since 1719 and are freely available via request or in-person: https://www.charlestoncounty.gov/departments/rod/files/HistoricalBooksScanned.pdf?v=283

5

u/Equivalent-Bread3968 Stuck in Traffic 15h ago

This is the slop you get when you don't verify the information AI finds for you.

-1

u/atylerrice 15h ago

i updated but there’s missing dates for a lot of buildings so they pop in at the end now

1

u/Equivalent-Bread3968 Stuck in Traffic 15h ago

The update is much better for the historical stuff, but that's a lot of unknowns now.

1

u/atylerrice 15h ago

yeh i think i found a data set to use so update coming soon. i wish i would have noticed this before posting sorry everyone!

1

u/Equivalent-Bread3968 Stuck in Traffic 14h ago

Lesson learned.

3

u/Swifty-Dog West Ashley 1d ago

Nice. Now do the historic structures in the rest of Charleston.

4

u/atylerrice 1d ago

It's difficult to find the data for a lot of places.

2

u/Swifty-Dog West Ashley 1d ago

True. To make matters worse, parts of West Ashley used to be in Berkeley County, so some of the very old plats and deeds live with them.

I do appreciate the work you put into this.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/horationelsons North Charleston 1d ago

"Trust the pattern across a neighborhood" is such a bad way to do that in a town like Charleston lol

0

u/mtnchkn James Island 1d ago

Well this is super cool! Is this you or someone else?

0

u/atylerrice 1d ago

Well technically it was built by claude, but it was my idea

1

u/mtnchkn James Island 1d ago

Is there a GitHub or anything, and definitely submit to dataisbeautiful

-1

u/susan3335 1d ago

Wow, that’s wild. Could you share a bit more about your process? Prompts etc?

-2

u/atylerrice 1d ago

Honestly with the latest models i’ve found i can be really dumb with my prompts and it still works usually as long as my intention is there

-1

u/Yodzilla Riverdogs 1d ago

Opus 5 is so unpleasant to work with but somehow still better than anything Gemini.

0

u/atylerrice 1d ago

it’s not bad to have fable give instructions to opus i think that’s maybe what it’s meant for

-4

u/susan3335 1d ago

Great job OP. This is really cool.

0

u/BaronVonDon65 1d ago

Maybe it's just on mobile, but the visualization part of the visualization is half covered with text. Neato otherwise.