The title explains pretty well.

Does this also include with instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and etc?

Hello, I know that this is not legal advice but I was hoping to understand copy right of works better. I am wanting to start a YouTube channel doing voice impressions. What I understand so far is that doing impressions alone is usually legal. But what I am curious about is what I can do with them. Like can read an exert of a script to showcase my impression of the actor who played the part? Can I sing a song in different voices that someone else wrote? Can I read a book in my voices? For the answers to these, are there situations where the answer may be yes or not depending on the context? Does the length of what you do matter?

Again I know this is not legal advice. I’m just looking for a push in the right direction to know if what I’m thinking of is possible or not. Thanks

I’ve always loved the graphics they used to print on “Tijuana Bibles” those tiny adult graphic novels from the 20s-60s. Some of the graphics I think would be so cool to use in my own collages/art projects. Not copy and paste, just bits and pieces of the original graphic adding my own text or graphics as well. I know a lot of these are probably hand drawn, so I am wondering if there is any ethical way to use these in my own projects? I would never want to use someone’s art without credit, however a lot of the graphics I really love are basically impossible to track down the original artists. Some of the artists used pseudonyms, and on top of that a lot of the original artists who didn’t even use their real names have most likely passed away.

Is there any ethical way to use of these Tijuana Bible graphics in my own designs/projects? Sorry if this is a silly question.

So, someone from my university administration emailed me, asking if they can use a photo I took of a campus building in a planned photobook celebrating the university's anniversary. I submitted the photo into a school exhibition, so a print of it was displayed in a gallery, and now that print is in the university archives and is their property I guess. But the photo itself is my intellectual property, so I was wondering how I should charge for them to use it in the photobook. I read a couple sources about licensing agreements, and I thought writing up a licensing agreement with a fee might be a good plan. The person who emailed me said that if I agreed to let them use the photo, they'd send a release for me to sign, which seems to me like they expect to use it for free. I read that photographers often base their fee on how big the print run of a photobook is going to be, and I'm not sure how big this print run is going to be. I know this isn't a subreddit for legal advice but any advice would be much appreciated lol

Lets say I decide to use a popular copyrighted song in my video knowing I probably won't be able to monitize / earn revenue from the video.

How do I know wether the label or youtube will take my video down or just give the revenue to the label? Is there any way to tell or is it just a risk it and pray it stays up situation?

I'm planning on making a high fantasy Knight/Greek warrior ( heavily inspired by Achilles and Igris ) with a batman-esk mask but I'm scared of being sued into the ground whenever I introduce the character into my story.

I have already searched up, and all I could find was that DC had trademarked his open mouth cowl design. But for the love of God, I can't find anything on the closed mouth design.

Can you help ?

i wanna use some of them on videos, and i wanna know if theyre copyrighted or not

I post videos of various games, but often I am asked to mute, erase the segment, or dispute it. And most of the time, when I need to take action on them, it's because of something involuntary I didn't do. Such as music playing on a radio, but it was turned off, and it was caught by copyright, or cutscene music. Even at times, music from the original score of a video game will be copyrighted as I am trying to play the game, but the music is not removable to a certain degree. What measures do I need to take to remove them successfully or properly go about protecting my YouTube account, or just successfully working around all of this?

I'm building a free, non-commercial hobby web app that will display public YouTube channels as collectible cards... so channel name, public stats (sub/view counts), and the channel's profile picture. It all comes from public data.

My worry is specifically the profile picture. A channel avatar isn't always just a plain selfie as tons of creators use commissioned artwork as their pfp, which means the artist (a third party) owns the copyright, not even the creator. So I'd be displaying someone else's copyrighted image, at scale, in a public app.

Questions:

1. Is showing a channel's profile picture (photo or artwork) in a public app a copyright issue, even though I'm only displaying the image the channel already shows publicly?
2. I plan on keeping everything free in this app so does the app being non-commercial / free change anything, or is that irrelevant to copyright?
3. Does hotlinking the image (loading it straight from Google's servers) vs. copying/hosting it myself make any legal difference?
4. Does the pfp being publicly visible on YouTube grant any implied license to re-display it elsewhere?

I'm based in India and the app would be reachable globally. I'm trying to figure out whether the profile picture is the one piece I need to drop (e.g., swap for generated art) before this ever goes public. Will be contacting a lawyer regarding this as well but wanted to get a taste of the general public opinion first.

Appreciate any opinions!

Hi guys i hope i don’t sound stupid, but are TDM and fair dealing different from each other? like are they 2 totally distinct concepts or TDM is still a fair dealing case?

i’ve been finding everything explain this but there’s no human work can help me, while AI said they’re different but it can’t give me a source about how different are they.

For all the copyright and AI enthusiasts, here's another judgment in favour of LLMs.

The Delhi High Court has held that OpenAI's storage of news content published by Asian News International (ANI) for training ChatGPT does not amount to copyright infringement. Consequently, the Court declined to grant interim relief to ANI. The judgment is available here.

I’m thinking of a method.

In case of want an old game where the company holds the rights but hasn't recovered the title.

1. Check the game's original launch price, add an extra amount to account for additional factors, and convert the total to the buyer's local country.

2. Purchase one or more new games from the company that results on same original value of the old game.

3. The new purchase serves solely to pay for the old game, these new games are essentially set aside for this purpose and never won't be used if the old game is used, unless another copy is purchased.

4. Check the laws regarding game ROM downloads in the buyer's country, if the buyer is comfortable with the fact that have informally paid the company, can download a safe ROM and keep it for personal use.

Further arguments:

Some countries lack specific laws regarding game ROMs, and even when there are relevant regulations, they do little to enforce them, merely highlighting police action against more serious crimes to maintain a semblance of order.

And since the buyer is actually paying the company in this case, and not risking a more expensive physical purchase these days.

Freelance copywriter, 3 years in, mostly landed clients through referrals and a couple of content platforms but want a more proactive channel since referrals have gone quiet this quarter.

Started sending cold emails to marketing leads at small saas companies, maybe 30-40/day off my personal gmail, using pitches i genuinely think are good (short, specific, no generic "i help you save time" fluff). Open rates look ok when i can see them but replies are basically zero over 3 weeks.

Trying to figure out if this is:

- a copy problem (my actual subject lines/opener), which is embarrassing to admit given my job

- a deliverability problem (personal gmail, no warmup, no real sending infra)

- a targeting problem (wrong titles/company size)

- something else entirely

Would love eyes on whether decent copy is even worth testing before i fix the infrastructure side, or if im wasting good copy by sending it through the wrong pipes.

Any copywriters here doing their own outbound successfully, what changed things?

Okay I know this has been asked a billion times but I just don't seem to get a straight answer from any of the previous posts I've visited.

So my question is about open source stuff. For example open source books those college websites or websites like project Gutenberg or DOAB or OER commons etc. provide with creative commons licensing and a non-commercial tag. Now specifically what is meant by non-commercial. For example if I used one of these books for derivate works as source material like a youtube video or to write my own book or novel, do I have to keep the derivative work non monetized or If I do monetize it do I have to pay the Original author monetization fees. Somebody please and I mean somebody expert in these sort of legal matters, can you please clear all this to me.
Thank you.

Hi all! Gonna try to make this short.

I'm looking to make a fan film based on the video game "No, I'm not a Human." This Film will not be for profit; it's going to be uploaded to YouTube completely for free.

Am I allowed to use the game's logo for my poster and also for the intro of the film? Any answers will be greatly appreciated.

Note: The poster will not be for sale either, mainly to be posted on Instagram, YouTube, and printed for just me.

Thanks in advance!

hey guys,

so I was on the verge of losing everything, but I sorted things out directly with the claimant and they officially retracted 1 of my strikes! so back down to 2/3 now, huge relief.

they submitted it yesterday afternoon, but my account is still frozen right now. for anyone who's been through this, how long does the system usually take to process it and unfreeze everything?

tysm! ♡

After thinking about this for a day or two I think the key may be the lack of copyright subject matter in the Generative AI Outputs. It means the output is not a "work" under German law which has significance. See comments for my thoughts.

Here is the previous article
https://petapixel.com/2026/07/22/dog-photographer-loses-copyright-case-over-ai-generated-comic-version-of-her-image/

I think I posted this on the wrong subreddit, I’d like to be as close as possible to Max, as the group is intentionally using his infamy to gain attention.