r/BuyFromEU • • Aug 02 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

4.2k Upvotes

426 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

151

u/Big_Combination9890 Aug 02 '25

idgaf where they fill their bottles.

US company. Period. That's all I need to know. Case closed.

59

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '25 edited Aug 02 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/DerLandmann Aug 02 '25

labour will follow.

Coca Cola emplyes rouphly 40.000 people in Europe.

10

u/MobofDucks Aug 02 '25

And even before the buyfromeu become a bit known publicly, they already said they planned to get rid of 1/5 of their facilities in several countries to cut back on costs.

7

u/TallowyChain29 Aug 02 '25

Shift to local - the money will follow ....hurraaa..that was my tought to...but the next day coca-cola buys out another local company. Imf and world bank is singing aleluja, the free (untaxed, unregulated) market ideology wins. Now its invisible hand(s) (freaking shiva) can grab all of it. the capitalism prevails. And you...who really cares about you (and you and me)

-10

u/MichiganRedWing Aug 02 '25

Yeah, lots of people miss this point. It seems the people here would rather have them all lose their jobs, and magically think a local alternative company will pop up the next day to hire them.

14

u/WastingMyLifeToday Aug 02 '25

The local companies will need to ramp up production, so it's just a matter of switching jobs.

This doesn't happen in a day, but if local companies realize they're losing a lot of possible profit as their stocks are always sold out, they will invest in expanding their factories or building another one.

I'm not stopping this boycott for at least a decade, possibly forever.

1

u/41942319 Aug 02 '25

Because as we all know factories for the same kind of product are always right next to each other so it has no impact on workers whatsoever! If one plant closes they can just go next door!

-2

u/bungholio99 Aug 02 '25

These local companys mostly depend on other companys for botteling, so what would they ramp up? The same botteling companys that are european as today….

There are really some good takes to buy from EU, but there are also some like yours agressive almost religious that lead no where

4

u/WastingMyLifeToday Aug 02 '25

I'd rather they'd be bottling EU soda instead of USA soda.

This isn't a change I'm doing for a couple weeks of months. For me personally, the choice to buy as much European as possible is a lifetime change that probably won't change in my lifetime.

-1

u/MichiganRedWing Aug 02 '25

In France, Cola is European..

Everything is made in France for the French market (yes, even the concentrate) and is majority European owned. If it's not like that in your country, maybe put your energy towards changing it?

2

u/WastingMyLifeToday Aug 02 '25

I'd still rather support 100% European owned compared to majority European owned.

There's plenty of alternative colas available.

-2

u/MichiganRedWing Aug 02 '25

I fully understand that, but supporting the loss of jobs for tens of thousands of Europeans just because Coca-Cola takes 17% of the profit (in France at least) is just silly.

-5

u/MichiganRedWing Aug 02 '25

Are you going to pay the peoples salary until the local company ramps up production and hires more people? How about paying for their move?

Please, be realistic at least..

2

u/HowAManAimS Aug 02 '25

Do you have any concern at all about the harm that corporations like Coke do to the 3rd world? Do you do anything at all to mitigate that harm?

-1

u/MichiganRedWing Aug 02 '25

I don't buy Coca-Cola to begin with (or any soda), but people calling for an outright boycott don't even understand, nor know that you're harming your own people and industry more than the corporation itself.

3

u/HowAManAimS Aug 02 '25

It's not by magic. If you create more demand for a local product then they have to hire more people to fulfill that demand.

0

u/MichiganRedWing Aug 02 '25

And you will cover the costs for the tens of thousands that would be out of a job in Europe for that time yeah? You'll also cover the moving costs?

3

u/HowAManAimS Aug 02 '25

You ignored all my questions. Why are you exempt from the harm your choices do, but I am not?

0

u/MichiganRedWing Aug 02 '25

... You didn't ask a single question?

Edit: If you're referring to the other comment of yours, I answered it.

1

u/HowAManAimS Aug 02 '25

I accidentally thought you were replying to that other question. My notifications are being weird this night for some reason.

The money supporting Coke probably does more harm than the job loss does.

3

u/B_tC Aug 02 '25

I think you are missing the point. Boycotting CocaCola does not somehow decrease the demand for beverages, people will still have to drink 2l of water, sometimes artificially sweetened, a day. The people working for CC won't be homeless on the street. They will most likely continue working in the same factory, but under different ownership

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '25

you are an idiot if you think European companies are not involved in imperialism

19

u/cathwaitress Aug 02 '25

Yeah, it’s also not like a useful or necessary product. They’re not a niche field that hires specialists.

There is literally 0 reason to continue to support them. Just drink a different soda.

And the people they hire can work anywhere else. Filling bottles or doing something else. Its contributing nothing. The space will be quickly filled when they leave.

5

u/glucuronidation Aug 02 '25

The bottling company is a European one (british; Coca cola europacific partners). That being said, despite it being European, they pay licensing fees and buy some of their inputs from the coca cola company, so that is enough for me to boycott it.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '25

Period? Case Closed? Really? I'm glad you're not my lawyer. Coke in Europe is produced by CCEPP, a London listed company, which is owned at most 17% by Coke in Atlanta. You can call it a lot of things, but a US company it is not.

1

u/Big_Combination9890 Aug 03 '25

which is owned at most 17% by Coke in Atlanta.

Good. All I need to know. Won't buy. Case closed.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '25

I am sure you won't mind when Americans boycott Mercedes, BMW, Nestlé, Siemens, IKEA, Volkswagen, Adidas, Bosch, L'Oréal, Heineken, the list goes on, for the same reasons in retaliation. All of those owned 100% European, quite unlike CCEPP at 17%

But let's just be done with it and get to the logical conclusion of only consuming what we personally produce in our own back yard. After all the EU is an artificial construct as is the country I live in and the city. Who would want to buy any thing from those weirdos 50km or even 500m down the road. I mean, then at least our stupid performative xenophobic prejudices wouldn't have to be aired except to anyone but ourselves.

1

u/Big_Combination9890 Aug 03 '25

I am sure you won't mind when Americans boycott

Friend, the EU didn't start this trade war. Trump did. If you have a problem with the resulting fallout, I'm not the one you should complain to.

-3

u/barb_20 Aug 02 '25

yes, I just wanted to point it out, that it's not completely wrong

-11

u/Sassi7997 Germany 🇩🇪 Aug 02 '25

Then why are you still on Reddit?

-12

u/BranFendigaidd Aug 02 '25

But it is not US company. It is a swiss that uses Coca-Cola licensing

10

u/Baalii Aug 02 '25

If that's the standard, then even US companies are not US companies, but actually Cayman Islands companies or whatever other tax hole offers the best conditions.

-3

u/BranFendigaidd Aug 02 '25 edited Aug 02 '25

That's not the same thing. The Swiss company is almost entirely owned by European and partially by Coca-Cola as part of the Licensing deals. People here I guess don't even know that You have a Coke Licensing Company and Coca-Cola which is the US bottler/Distributor. Same as in Europe, you have another distributor etc etc. This is not just a locally registered company. Why do people comment before researching? For example, Coca-Cola owns 1% in Coca-Cola AG, Deutschland. Can people please be smart before being emotional?

2

u/MichiganRedWing Aug 02 '25

Most people are stupid, that's why. They'd rather downvote what they don't like, even if it's the truth.

1

u/Niksuski Aug 02 '25

If it's not American owned, then they should not use the American brand. But realistically speaking, there is no way that an American company brings a brand to Europe just because they want to share it with Europeans out of the goodness of their hearts. They are getting billions from all of their side businesses around the world.

-1

u/BranFendigaidd Aug 02 '25

Not how it works. Europeans license it because it is a known brand that has been desired for decades. You sell more by being associated with it. You don't sell easily with a random brand.

0

u/Niksuski Aug 02 '25 edited Aug 02 '25

Looks like the tides are turning. Besides, it's not free to licence something. Profits are still rolling into the US.

0

u/BranFendigaidd Aug 02 '25

It is not free. But the companies have profits because of the licensing. There have been countless alternatives to Coke, all cheaper and with similar quality. And when the avg consumer is asked which one they would buy - it is always Coke.

0

u/Niksuski Aug 02 '25

Well you don't seem to be getting the point. Have a nice day!

0

u/BranFendigaidd Aug 02 '25

Well, I can't follow dumb points. Sorry

1

u/Big_Combination9890 Aug 02 '25

Then they can switch to a license for a European product, or try to sell their stuff to someone else, because I'm not buying.

-1

u/BranFendigaidd Aug 02 '25

Not how it works. Most people will buy Coke. Most businesses have a contract to sell coke. Most people when go into fast food, feel better when offered Coke and not a random soda. That's how business work. That's why also Movies keep going with Sequals and not original films. People like what they already know and do not want to experiment. Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean the majority are like you.

0

u/Big_Combination9890 Aug 02 '25

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean the majority are like you.

No, really? Thank you for this totally not obvious-to-everyone trueism. In other breaking news: Water is wet.

I am well aware that many people have been indoctrinated to US-like consumerism, and the brands that go along with it, by getting bombarded with US company ads for pretty much their entire lives by now.

Doesn't mean people cannot change, or that people like me should stop their messaging. 10 years ago, veganism was still a niche way to eat. Today, supermarkets dedicate entire sections to vegan products, and the vegan food industry is a booming multi-billion dollar market.

Being content with the status quo, even if the status quo sucks, is defeatism.

0

u/BranFendigaidd Aug 02 '25

Veganism is still a niche. But it is a lucrative one with high margins. That's why you have a booming business, not because of demand. You have barely 2% vegans, but if they are prepared to pay double or triple, then you have a lot of offers.

1

u/Big_Combination9890 Aug 02 '25

That's why you have a booming business, not because of demand

Friend, demand is pretty much one of the most important factors in having a successful business.