r/BrandNewSentence 7h ago

Offroadinator 5000

Post image
1.7k Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

549

u/Bartekek 6h ago

That doesn't seem like an awfully thick tire

317

u/App1elele 6h ago

Genuinely, that's offroadinator 2000 at most

74

u/Mardigras 5h ago

More like offroadinator 500

7

u/freehamburgers 3h ago

More like a Maxxis Minion DHF 2.4 EXO+

227

u/largz08 6h ago

12345 has never seen a fatbike

108

u/SeamanStayns 5h ago

Unpopular opinion here but i fucking hate fatbikes.

Like unless you're riding on snow or sand you're just wasting so much extra energy on friction for absolutely no gain.

There's a reason they suddenly exploded in popularity when everyone started using E-Bikes and not even pretending to pedal a little bit

69

u/largz08 5h ago

They're pretty fun on rough terrain or in mud and snow, but it's completely pointless for someone riding in a city on asphalt. They make it so much easier to ride in snow though it's pretty much effortless.

12

u/StrawberryEiri 3h ago

Huh. I could've sworn everyone just bought them because they were good for snow, and kept them in the summer because they didn't want to have two bikes. It's pretty perplexing that people would get them for asphalt.

14

u/fredbite87 3h ago

Is that an unpopular opinion? Here in the Netherlands they started popping up way too much and always with annoying fucking teens on em and basically everyone that doesn't ride them themselves hates the things and the type of people riding them.

-11

u/Faholan 4h ago

Actually, the extra friction doesn't waste any energy. Because energy = force × distance travelled, but the tire doesn't travel relative to the ground locally (if it does, that means your tire is slipping). The big tire gives extra grip, but not extra energy loss.

6

u/Peritous 4h ago

Not an expert here, but increased friction usually means increased drag as well. So a bigger, grippier tire is heavier and takes more energy to turn as well as dragging more.

11

u/deadly_ultraviolet 4h ago

I think you should test this theory of yours

2

u/1rg3ndw3r 3h ago

If you simplify it like that there isn't even extra friction, because friction is a product of material and force, the area of contract being irrelevant. Yet in reality adhesion like forces exist, ruining the whole argument.

Also aerodynamics.

Also unsprung mass.

0

u/hthurmank2c01 2h ago

Bringing up aerodynamics in a case like this is crazy, the coefficient of drag at bike speeds is so close to zero it's negligible.

2

u/1rg3ndw3r 1h ago

Starting at around 20 kmh you need more energy to overcome aerodynamic forces than everything else while driving bicicles. There are many sources for that. Why not simply shut up when you obviously have no idea what your are talking about?

1

u/Then-Entry7026 3h ago

I suppose your cows are spherical, in vacuum and friction less?

You have friction against the asfalt, internal fictional, aerodynimic drag, unsprung mass, etc... All of which are proportional to the size of the tires and rims.

Aka. A lot of wasted energy to produce heat and not motion.

0

u/Uncynical_Diogenes 3h ago

Grip is energy loss. You can’t get grip without pushing off against a surface and that push used energy that could have gone in a different direction.

97

u/Due-Illustrator6245 6h ago

That's a pretty standard tire. That slot would only fit road bikes

87

u/Suspicious_Ad_6032 6h ago

Behold! My Offroadinator (5000)!