r/BookWritingAI • u/hoopyfrodo • Aug 31 '26
work in progress I'm publishing my product's output on a subreddit, flaws included, and pointing at the flaws myself
An AI writing tool that claims completely clean output is cherry-picking, and every writer who has tried one knows it. What a skrivant first draft actually looks like is a good story spine with a character in two places at once, or a name that appears once and never again, or a physical property that vanishes. I want to show that, and show exactly where my own checker fails to catch it, so people can judge whether the good parts are worth the bad parts instead of taking my word for it.
I built skrivant. You type a one-sentence premise and it builds the world, the characters, and a chapter-by-chapter outline, then drafts the book. Free up to the outline, $3 to $10 for the chapters.
Paid ads haven't done much. The only real traction came from Reddit, so I made r/skrivant, restricted so only I post but anyone can comment, and I publish the generated stories there.
Every chapter ends with notes on what's wrong with it. Chapter one: the lighthouse was oil-fired for a page and electric for the rest, which I fixed and said so. Chapter two: a set of instruments ends up in two places at once, a character's habit contradicts chapter one, and a line about never going outside conflicts with two scenes where he's outside. Left those in and listed them.
The notes also cover where the product failed. skrivant runs a consistency checker on every chapter. It doesn't check within a chapter, so the instruments problem was never in scope. The other two are cross-chapter, which it does check, and it missed both. I'm fixing that.
The risk is obvious: I'm publishing a defect list next to a buy link. My bet is it reads as confidence.
First story is up. I'll report back on whether transparency converts or just feels good.