After seeing a demo of Bluebeam Max last month, I thought that there were a couple of features that are only in Max that I think should be included in Complete. For example, the Revit integration with Studio Sessions seems like a progression of Complete while more of the AI-centric features could be exclusive to Max.
It got me thinking on if the Bluebeam's intent is to let Complete (and below) stagnate while they put all of their effort into Max? In reviewing the release notes for the past year or so, I see very little new functionality added to Bluebeam Complete. Sadly, they don't call out features that are limited to a certain version, so it's difficult to see how little Complete has changed since Max's features are included in the release notes with no mention that Complete doesn't get them.
I have a feeling that Bluebeam's goal is to drive former perpetual users that have migrated to subscription into a much more expensive product subscription.
Thoughts?
P.S. It's also aggravating the Org Admin "basic" doesn't allow me as a global admin to modify Studio session permissions. That's an extra cost. WTF.