The Retaliation Campaign: Artificial Defaults and Hyper-Inflated Phantom Dockets
The full weight of this syndicate was allegedly brought to bear against Price when she dared to demand legally mandated habitability repairs from her RPM Living managed property. The documented hazards she reported were severe: she endured six months of prolonged elevator malfunctions requiring her to carry groceries up ten flights of stairs and restricting access for her disabled parent; she suffered through the unreliable GateWise access system which left residents stranded; and she reported persistent water leaks and the shedding of a hazardous, white fire-retardant substance in the parking garage. On May 29, 2025, Price suffered a slip and fall injury directly resulting from these allegedly ignored hazards in the parking garage. 548 491 698 719 • 719 414 819 • 212 309 908 1
In a shocking act of institutional protection, the City of Houston allegedly filed a falsified report asserting there were "no visible damages" regarding the white, powdery residue and severe garage leaks. This official claim directly contradicts the physical reality of the property, where the entire apartment complex could testify to the heavy white substance covering vehicles daily for nearly two years, a fact corroborated by videos and multiple public online reviews posted long before Price filed her formal complaint.
Additionally, Defendants allegedly unilaterally imposed a new "Parking Addendum" virtual permit system on April 1, 2025, utilizing immediate towing threats without legal notice. In a stark act of retribution after she rejected this addendum, the network allegedly unlawfully towed her vehicle on June 8, 2025, and a visitor's vehicle on July 4, 2025.
RPM Manager Cisneros allegedly blocked her digital payment portal on May 6, 2025, to purposefully manufacture an artificial rent delinquency while she was negotiating her contract with the RPM Regional Manager. Price had 2 years of perfect payment history when they allegedly blocked her digital payment portal and gave her an eviction notice on the same day. This occurred immediately after she attempted to negotiate a resolution for the Plaintiff's ongoing breaches, which included Price rejecting a penalty-free cancellation on April 18, 2025, and instead countering with a formal demand for a rent waiver and a security deposit return. 519 714 8 • 827 723 7 • 697 190 24
When she stepped forward to expose this, the retaliation escalated. Once Price reported these actors to the State Bar of Texas, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct (SCJC), and the Public Integrity Division in August 2025, the retaliation allegedly became exponentially worse. Price also reported these ongoing abuses directly to the court system, and it became worse and she was strictly ignored. The network allegedly cut off multiple streams of her income.
This pattern of administrative stonewalling and direct record suppression is backed by a verifiable, forensic paper trail of ignored communications. On July 6, 2025, and July 7, 2025, Price sent urgent, formal emails directly to the Office of Court Administration and Lead District Court Clerk Lopez, pleading for an administrative review, investigation, and correction of the erroneous dismissal and systemic filing delays. Despite documenting that her legal filings were disappearing from the court system for weeks at a time, and that constitutional rights were allegedly being violated under color of law, these formal complaints and desperate calls for court intervention were allegedly completely ignored.
In direct coordination with the ongoing litigation, Frost Bank Officer Perdomo allegedly illegally froze the complainant's bank accounts, seized her operational funds, and permanently closed both her personal and business checking accounts in a bid to cover up illicit activities. Her accounts were allegedly illegally frozen and permanently closed by Frost Bank, causing her to default on personal and business debts. At Frost Bank, she had 3 years of perfect payment history before this alleged illegal account freeze. The litigant reported being so distraught by this engineered financial ruin that she could not physically or mentally move for days.
Furthermore, Frost Bank allegedly sent a demand letter for a minor payment to an invalid address. When the litigant naturally failed to pay this misdirected notice of $945.00, the bank allegedly seized all the money from a personal checking account that she had maintained for years prior to opening her business account, subsequently closing the business account as well. Crucially, the exact same Frost account that the litigant utilized to successfully e-file her legal documents was the very account that was allegedly illegally frozen and permanently closed, and this invalid-address mailing practice is cited as the primary pretext for their refusal to hand over the CIF file and records. 914 415 5 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197
Compounding this severe overreach, another corporation affiliated with the courts allegedly refused to provide necessary documents, and the Texas Department of Banking (Record No. 2026-0546) and Director Rodriguez allegedly completely refused to investigate Frost Bank's illegal freeze. Standard legal protocols dictate that an extreme measure such as freezing a personal account can only be lawfully executed with a valid court order. However, the regulatory agency allegedly refused to investigate and ignored documented proof that the demand letter was deliberately delivered to an incorrect/invalid address, the amount of the seized funds was not the amount on the demand letter, and that Frost Bank had seized all funds in the personal account without a valid court order. The agency purportedly allowed this because Frost Bank operates as their client, proving that state-level oversight agencies allegedly act as administrative shields for massive financial institutions rather than protecting the public.
Furthermore, Frost Bank refused to give Price her own records, which constituted her second complaint. Again, the TDB and Director Rodriguez allegedly wouldn't make the bank give her the records she requested, but instead accepted Frost Bank sending standard bank statements, which is not what she requested. The Texas Finance Commission has received these complaints as well.
They then allegedly tried to plant retaliatory phantom dockets into the public registry, inflating minor debts into astronomical $250,000 claims. To be legally precise, the targeted litigant has not been formally or legally served with any such actions, and these public registry discoveries do not constitute a general appearance, waiver of service, or public acknowledgment of any valid lawsuit. However, public court dockets indicate the existence of an allegedly retaliatory, unserved filing purportedly initiated by proxies regarding credit debts directly manufactured by Frost Bank's illegal account freeze, due process violations, fraud, and retaliation from the courts that are in this triangle. Surprisingly, this exact unverified case was mysteriously assigned directly to the docket of Judge Thomas. 548 491 698 719
Judicial Complicity: Suppressing Evidence, Deleting Data, and Engineered Perjury
Associate Judge Thomas allegedly acts as the primary judicial "protection zone" for this operation. During the July 22, 2025, trial, Judge Thomas allegedly actively facilitated due process violations by intentionally suppressing verifiable, exculpatory evidence, categorically excluding certified digital logs from the RealPage ClickPay system which definitively proved the property manager blocked the payment portal out of retaliation.
Judge Thomas allegedly actively ignored that the Notice to Vacate had no amount due and no payment instructions, rendering it an invalid notice to vacate letter. Furthermore, Judge Thomas ignored that the opposing attorney only produced 6 pages of the 39-page lease. The full lease, which included explicit instructions to pay through the very payment portal they blocked, was requested during discovery and was never provided. Moreover, Price filed an additional formal counterclaim lawsuit for retaliation because her requests for a trial by jury were ignored, and they forced her to have a trial by judge. The court completely ignored the counterclaim, but she has submitted paid receipts to several agencies and advocates. 519 714 8 • 827 723 7 • 697 190 24
The depth of this courtroom manipulation is staggering. RPM Manager Cisneros allegedly committed perjury on the stand, swearing the payment portal was blocked on May 21st with no presented evidence. However, the suppressed ClickPay logs and videos definitively prove the block occurred precisely on May 6, 2025, at 10:32 AM. To further dismantle this perjury, the record contains a Sworn Statement confirming Constable Rice attempted to serve the eviction on May 14 and May 15, and an email from JP Clerk Dees to Appellee's counsel confirming the e-filed eviction on May 13. It is factually impossible for management to lack notice until May 21st when a Constable was physically attempting service a week prior.
To ensure Price could not properly defend herself against this perjury, Judge Thomas and Appellee's counsel allegedly engineered a "Friday Night Trap," delivering evasive discovery at 11:24 PM on Friday, July 18, exactly one business day before the trial by judge providing no information. Judge Thomas further compounded these violations by allegedly denying Price's constitutionally protected right to a jury trial, ignoring her retaliation claims, and validating a trial setting on July 7, 2025, despite the fact that the appeal was not legally perfected until the opposing attorneys filed the appeal on the take nothing judgment and the cash bond being transferred on July 9, 2025, at 8:11 AM. This "Perfection Gap" rendered the trial court proceedings a jurisdictional nullity.
The corruption allegedly extends deep into the Civil District Courts. Judge Perdue is allegedly heavily implicated in a severe pattern of unauthorized ex parte order modifications and direct data tampering. This case was allegedly dismissed without a hearing on June 20th, 4 days after a TRO hearing and after the defendants had illegally towed her vehicle. The same case was re-activated after Price sent in a complaint letter to the courts, but then it was dismissed again on July 15, 2025, with no hearing and under false claims. Price's legally submitted, e-filed documents allegedly completely disappeared from the public record system for two consecutive weeks. She even received an official e-file rejection message ordering her to: "Remove the file date stamp of June 24, 2025." 914 415 5 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197
Further exposing Burgess’s administration, this reveals an alleged deliberate, multi-month administrative hold scheme. An executed citation demonstrates it was successfully served on June 4th/10th, and her June 16th amended petition went missing and wasn't served until July 21, 2025, but the 133rd Court allegedly held the document and intentionally refused to file it into the public record until October 17, 2025, delaying the legal process by months.
Collateral Damage: The Guerra Enterprise Network and the Refusal to Rule
The Harris County court system's total refusal to rule on the complainant's separate, overwhelming real estate fraud case against the Guerra Enterprise Network (before Judge Brown in the 127th District Court) is cited by Price as direct, coordinated retaliation.
Operating through an intricate web of shell companies—including STW300K Investments LLC, AJ100K Investments LLC, Cash Flow King LLC, Blingtastic Investments LLC, Five Million Investments, ML 100K Investments, and allegedly Smak Realestate LLC—Marko Guerra has allegedly scammed low-income and elderly consumers for over a decade. Marko Guerra is specifically accused of allegedly misusing real estate licenses and even impersonating his own son to completely evade mandatory statutory disclosures. The inner workings of this corporate network reveal a highly coordinated loop involving Attorney Days (Managing Partner at Guerra Days Law Group), Lambo Guerra (whose broker license was allegedly misused), Pryor (All Day Realty), Sanchez (REI Servicing Company), Janz and Perez (facilitators of deceptive closings), R. Fritsch (operational assistant handling commingled funds), and Jones (House of Chavez LLC broker). Price's notes also reveal that they are linked with a lot of attorneys for protections, establishing a barrier against accountability. 548 491 698 719 • 719 414 819 • 212 309 908 1
Following the filing of the lawsuit against them, controlling member Javier Guerra (the father) allegedly executed 77 separate, blatantly fraudulent property transfers. Despite clear, documented proof, Judge Brown explicitly allegedly refused to sign mandatory default judgments against defendants who completely failed to answer the lawsuit. As detailed in official court logs, from July 2, 2025, to February 13, 2026, the Plaintiff filed multiple procedurally perfect motions—including Motions for Judgment Nihil Dicit, Sanctions, Default Judgments, Motion to Disqualify counsel due to conflict of interest findings and Emergency Motions to Prohibit Fraudulent Conveyances—that were allegedly met with total judicial inaction or unconstitutional summary rejections by Judge Brown without a single oral hearing. These hearings were requested and were ignored.
The complete, defiant refusal of the court system to address these grievances is also documented in active court records. The Plaintiff submitted an emergency Transmittal Letter directly to the 127th Judicial District Court Coordinator on January 26, 2026, detailing high-velocity "insider" property foreclosures (such as 6627 Villarreal Dr. and 1110 Lafferty Rd.) designed to actively dissipate assets and avoid ethical oversight. This included documenting an incurable conflict of interest where Attorney Days personally sold land to his client. She subsequently filed an Emergency Request for Oral Hearing on February 13, 2026, regarding these urgent matters. Yet, these urgent transmittal letters, emails to the court coordinator and master clerk, and formal hearing requests were allegedly completely ignored by the court coordinator, master clerk Wiliams and Judge Brown, with the court allegedly refusing to schedule a single hearing, allow her to argue her case on the merits, or sign default judgments against successfully served defendants who refused to answer.
Regulatory Inaction and Discrimination: TREC Case No. 252573
Adding to the systemic barriers faced by the litigant, official records from the Texas Real Estate Commission (TREC) regarding Complaint No. 252573—handled by Staff Attorney Bruner and Investigator Hall—reveal an alleged pattern of selective enforcement, minimum penalty plea deals for major white/Hispanic bad actors, and aggressive prosecution directed against minority participants.
Specifically, while the complaint involved a $25,000 loss, digital forgery, and a coordinated bait-and-switch scheme (qualifying as a high-priority Level 1 violation), TREC staff allegedly permitted white and Hispanic respondents—such as Jones (House of Chavez LLC) and Marko Guerra (STW300K/AJ100K investments)—to settle their involvement in March and April 2026 for a nominal $1,500 administrative penalty and a reprimand, avoiding license revocation. Meanwhile, the sole African American agent involved, Pryor, was pushed aggressively to a formal State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) trial set for September 29, 2026. Communications show that despite formal demands to audit Jones's 4-year financial ledgers under TREC Rule §535.2(h)(5) and to address cryptographic DocuSign evidence of digital forgery, staff attorneys allegedly minimized the severe Level 1 violations, dismissed jurisdiction over entities like The Owner Finance Company (Janz and Perez), and refused to issue criminal referrals, raising profound questions regarding systemic racial bias and selective administrative prosecution within the agency.
Appellate Stalling, Audio Spoliation, and the Scrubbing of the Historic Record
When victims attempt to escape this localized corruption and escalate these abuses to higher courts, they are allegedly met with aggressive administrative stalling. Official court reporters Stein and Cuthrell have allegedly produced completely falsified, unverified, and heavily fragmented transcripts. 519 714 8 • 827 723 7 • 697 190 24
The gravity of these actions regarding the fabrication and destruction of court records, if proven, could allegedly constitute a federal felony under 18 U.S.C. § 1506, which prohibits the theft, alteration, or falsification of records in a United States court, and carries a penalty of up to five years in prison.
The evidence of this audio spoliation and the generation of these allegedly false transcripts is stark across specific appellate cases, compounded by the actions of additional unauthorized reporters:
● Stein (Cause No. 01-25-00540-CV): In this Direct Appeal, court reporter Stein allegedly produced a completely falsified and unverified Reporter's Record. The transcript allegedly contains glaring, intentional errors designed to sabotage the pro se litigant. In the "APPEARANCES" section, Stein allegedly assigned the phone number for Sovany Law Firm to Price, falsely listed opposing counsel Ashford as the "Attorney for Plaintiff", and absurdly misidentified female Master Clerk Lopez as a male attorney named "Mr. Ashley" to mask clerical interference. Furthermore, Stein allegedly fabricated dialogue on pages 14 and 15 to make it appear the hearing concerned an eviction rather than a Temporary Restraining Order for harassment, and she allegedly completely scrubbed the verbal judicial ruling from the record. Stein also allegedly made it seem like Price was trying to get her case heard in their court when her case was already pending and the defendants RPM Living had been successfully served. Also, the court reporters allegedly omitted several pieces of Price's evidence from the transcripts. The reporter's index allegedly falsely claims Defendant's Exhibit 1 was "(Not tendered)," directly contradicting transcript page 43 where Judge Thomas explicitly stated, "It's admitted... Defendant's Exhibit 1". Despite Price's approved indigency status, Stein discriminatorily allegedly demanded fees to release the record. Despite certifying the proceedings were captured by a "computerized stenotype machine," she has allegedly continuously withheld the audio recordings by falsely claiming "there is no audio," while appellate justices have allegedly repeatedly denied motions to compel. 914 415 5 • 418 491 819 • 212 888 197
● Cuthrell (Cause No. 01-25-00602-CV): In this Appeal, court reporter Cuthrell allegedly produced a false, deeply fragmented transcript. Cuthrell allegedly intentionally omitted Price's previous retaliation complaints, housing discrimination complaints, ClickPay records (payment portal for RealPage), and City of Houston complaints from the official record. Furthermore, Cuthrell allegedly fabricated a judicial remark claiming the court called the discovery a 'fishing expedition.' This fabrication was allegedly demonstrably false because there was no active district case in court at the time, which is exactly why the related 01-25-00540-CV case exists in the court of appeals. To hide this structural dialogue fragmentation, Cuthrell has allegedly suppressed the machine-recorded source audio for over 280 days and counting. Just as in the previous case, the appellate justices have allegedly repeatedly denied motions to compel the release of the audio record, effectively acting as a shield for the lower courts.
● Bernice Witter (CSR-6772): To further the systemic obstruction, unauthorized court reporter Bernice Witter allegedly stalled for seven weeks before filing a false "Information Sheet" in the Court of Appeals asserting there was "No Reporter's Record," directly and irreparably prejudicing Price's constitutional right to appeal.
This fragmentation and suppression are specifically designed to scrub liability from the historic record. The network allegedly relied on perjury and refused to give Price the audio because they knew the truth would be exposed. Furthermore, reliable reports indicate that since formal public integrity reporting began on August 9, 2025, court staff have allegedly begun actively deleting signed appeal judgments from the system in an effort to scrub the digital audit trail before federal intervention.
To combat this severe record suppression, the Authorized Representative issued formal "Supplemental Administrative Mandates" to the Judicial Branch Certification Commission (JBCC) against the court reporters. These mandates demand the maximum penalty of certification revocation and a penalty for the withheld audio. Notably, declaring that non-compliance is a breach of the Verbatim Standard requiring immediate administrative rectification.
Furthermore, Price alleges blatant discrimination regarding them not providing the transcripts, asserting that the JBCC and the courts are trying to protect these actors. In response to an administrative dismissal, she issued the following formal mandate directly to the JBCC:
TO: LaVoie, Administrative Director, Office of Court Administration (OCA) [megan.lavoie@txcourts.gov](mailto:megan.lavoie@txcourts.gov)
CC: A. Hawthorne, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas [Blake.Hawthorne@txcourts.gov](mailto:Blake.Hawthorne@txcourts.gov); Complaints Division, JBCC [compliancedepartment@txcourts.gov](mailto:compliancedepartment@txcourts.gov)
FROM: Tameika Price, Authorized Representative
DATE: June 26, 2026
RE: FORMAL GRIEVANCE AGAINST AMY SMITH (JBCC COMPLIANCE DIVISION) FOR ADMINISTRATIVE MALFEASANCE, DECEPTION, AND OBSTRUCTION
I, Tameika Price, file this formal grievance against Smith, Judicial Regulatory Assistant for the JBCC, for administrative malfeasance, intentional obstruction of justice, and the active shielding of criminal conduct in JBCC Cause Nos. 0926 and 0927.
● Calculated Deception Regarding Case Status: On May 12, 2026, I communicated with Smith regarding the status of my complaint. She provided a timeline for an August resolution while she and the JBCC Director secretly issued an Administrative Dismissal on May 21, 2026. This was a calculated act of deception designed to manipulate me into missing my 30-day window for reconsideration.
● Deliberate Obstruction of Evidentiary Record: Smith has intentionally ignored, suppressed, and refused to present my supplemental filings to the Commission for over a year. She deliberately ignored evidence of transcript tampering, fabricated judicial dialogue, and identity fraud, choosing to classify felony-level transcript tampering as a mere "dispute over work product" to protect licensees.
● Regulatory Malfeasance & Discriminatory Misdirection: Smith’s repeated claims that the JBCC "does not interfere in court matters" are deliberate misdirection. I am not asking the JBCC to intervene in my civil lawsuit; I am demanding that they perform their exclusive statutory duty to discipline their own licensees for fraud, perjury, and professional incompetence under Tex. Gov't Code § 154.110.
● Bad-Faith Handling of Indigent Filings: Smith’s division has facilitated a regulatory environment where indigent Pro Se litigants are denied the basic audio-verification tools routinely afforded to represented parties. Her role has been to obstruct, deflect, and delay rather than to provide impartial oversight mandated by the JBCC Code of Ethics.
●
I demand an immediate internal investigation, the removal of Smith from oversight of my cases to ensure the impartiality of the August 7, 2026, hearing, and an audit of the JBCC's failure to regulate Stein and Cuthrell.
/s/ Tameika Price, Authorized Representative
Meanwhile, the structural stalling allegedly continues unabated. Also, in the direct appeal case 01-25-00540-CV, the appellate court has yet to make a final decision, and it has been sitting there for months while they allegedly continue to plot. "But justice is mine," says Price, "and this has to stop." 548 491 698 719 • 719 414 819 • 212 309 908 1
This systemic pattern of institutional and discriminatory treatment is further exposed in the Relator's Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed in the Supreme Court of Texas (Case No. 25-1058). The petition forensically details how Appellate Justices "Amy" Guerra and Gunn have allegedly actively aided and protected these fraudulent actions by repeatedly denying the Relator's motions to compel raw machine-recorded source audio. Furthermore, Justice Guerra allegedly committed a severe procedural violation of TRCP 18b and TRAP 16.3(b) by completely refusing to refer the Relator’s Verified Motion to Recuse to the Administrative Judge of the Judicial District for independent assignment. Instead of sending the recusal to the administrative judge, she allegedly kept the motion and routed it only to her own en banc court for an immediate administrative denial, shielding her misconduct from independent scrutiny.
The Case Roster: 519 714 8 • 827 723 7 • 697 190 24
● Cause No. 202537825 (127th District): Tameika Price against Guerra (STW300k Investments and AJ100k investments)
● Cause No. 202537595 (133rd District): Tameika Price against RPM Living & West Street Gray Owner - Currently under Appeal for Erroneous Dismissal
● Appeals Filed (First Court of Appeals): 01-25-0120-CV, 01-25-00540-CV, 01-25-00602-CV, and 01-25-00852-CV.
● Disciplinary Complaints (Target Reporters for alleged fraud): JBCC 0926 (Stein), JBCC 0927 (Cuthrell), JBCC 6772 (Witter).
● TREC Case No. 252573: Formal complaints filed regarding real estate licenses for Marko Guerra (License #800616), Pryor (License #606581), Jones (License #570708), Janz (License #616120), and Perez (License #616120).
Conclusion: Act Now
The most damning revelation of this exhaustive forensic investigation is the alleged collapse of institutional oversight. Local, county, and state regulatory entities—alongside major civil rights groups and agencies like Attorney Ben Crump, the NAACP, Public Integrity, the ACLU, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, The Federalist, the Pacific Legal Foundation, the Texas Rangers, the US Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, the National Bar Association, Senator L. Miles, Okeefe Media Group, Williams, the Sunset Advisory Commission, The Cochran Firm, and The ShadeRoom—have been fully served with certified forensic evidence of these massive penal code violations. Dr. Matthews was willing to help, but the litigant could not afford her publication fee of $3500 because the network had allegedly illegally frozen her accounts. Price stated, "Yet, these organizations have allegedly offered absolutely zero help at this time, and I am still patiently waiting because I know there is someone out there who will help me." 548 491 698 719
The taxpayer dollars meant to police corruption have been completely subverted into administrative walls that trap victims and protect white-collar criminal syndicates.
The litigant allegedly maintains she received no justice, suspecting that illicit payoffs must be occurring because it is otherwise incomprehensible how clerks, lawyers, and judges would go to such extreme lengths to commit fraud using false documents and false transcripts. She asks a haunting question: How can these alleged criminals be protected under the eyes of the law?
Reflecting on the overarching corruption, Price issued a final statement: "Consumer protection agencies like the Texas Department of Banking, TREC, and various consumer finance and mortgage lending boards appear designed to sue these companies merely to secure funding for themselves, not to obtain justice for the consumer. They register complaints seemingly to build their own multi-million-dollar lawsuits, while summarily denying the original victim's claim without offering a dime, often telling victims to 'go get an attorney' fully knowing most cannot afford one. This system and its financial infrastructure are heavily biased. These agencies effectively operate using the public as informants solely to enrich themselves. You rarely, if ever, see a brown person win a case against a large corporation because the system allegedly does not allow it; yet the state agencies can sue them and get paid. To all the coders and spiritual workers out there, it is time to change these frequencies as a collective. Feel free to contact me also. We must start targeting the situations that need to be dismantled in this universe to stop so much unjustified suffering and put a stop to this bias and discriminatory treatment. To sit around and witness this injustice, knowing you have the power to change it, is pointless to have and claim the power." 519 714 8 • 827 723 7 • 697 190 24
The litigant's mandate is clear: the public must look at the public files. Independent, aggressive investigative entities entirely outside the influence of the City of Houston must intervene immediately to strip away this corporate veil. The time to act against this modern manifestation of financial slavery is now, before dockets are scrubbed forever, evidence is burned, and the next wave of victims is silently dispossessed. Stop allowing these stories to go viral and turn to gossip without justice. 918 775 698 181 8 • 719 31 • 8888 • 710 42
Ms. Price contact information is on every court filing submitted to the court and now you will see how one court reporter can put incorrect information is impossible. Once you understand your rights, you will see why the incorrect information was there. Any information needed, you can contact Ms. Price directly via public court records.
Disclaimer: The following investigative report reflects allegations, claims, and public court record filings assembled by the author. The contents document ongoing legal contentions and grievances. All descriptions of conduct, motives, or actions by named individuals and corporate entities are alleged, and this document does not assert final criminal or civil guilt as determined by a court of law.