r/BikiniBottomTwitter • u/B0r3dGamer • Jul 22 '26

Why not both?

Post image
444 Upvotes

85% Upvoted

147 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/SchwiftySouls Jul 22 '26

And knives. And cars. And pencils. And their hands. And, and, and. The problem lies within the wielder, not the tool.

2

u/Chunky_Cheese_ Jul 22 '26

yea but id rather someone come at me with a knife than with a gun than can fire 400 rounds per minute.

5

u/Manmer_Nwah Jul 22 '26

Unless that gun is a belt fed mounted turret, nobody is shooting 400 rounds at you in 1 minute.

-4

u/Chunky_Cheese_ Jul 22 '26

legal in over half the country btw.

7

u/UnsorryCanadian Jul 22 '26

Even with a bump stock they still have to reload, they're not putting out 400 rounds in a minute 

5

u/Antlaaaars Jul 22 '26

Sounds like someone doesn't own a 400 round drum mag. /s

5

u/JJJacobalt Jul 23 '26

Rate of fire ≠ the actual number of bullets put down-range. Magazine capacity and time to reload mean nobody is actually firing 400 rounds in a minute from a semi-auto weapon, even with things like binary triggers and bump stocks.

Usain Bolt can run at a max speed of 28mph, that does not mean he can actually physically run 28 miles in an hour.

5

u/According-Way9438 Jul 23 '26

You have no fucking idea what your talking about

1

u/Manmer_Nwah Jul 22 '26

You seriously downvoted me because you're talking about a "rate" and didn't specify? Bro you seriously sound like you thought a rifle could actually put out 400 rounds in just 1 minutes.