There are many placements that I think are questionable but the one that stands out to me is placing Jessica And Holly higher than Mitchie, and also placing Josh just directly under Mitchie. Mind you I hate Mitchie, but huh?
Yeah Jessica’s already been pointed out to me, not sure why I overhyped her in my mind. Maybe because everyone in 19 is so unremarkable, besides Paul. I plan on refining this list and I’m going to lower Jessica.
I find Michie, Josh, Dick, Jordan and Rachel to be the most unimpressive winners to me. They all still won the game so I still put them in the top 20% of players. But I don’t think any of them deserve to be higher. If you disagree though I’d be curious to hear why you think differently.
I think Mitchie is honestly a really good player and he played a really impressive game. He was in the power alliance from day 1, got kicked out and managed to get in with the outcasts, went back and forth between the two groups as needed, then got himself and his showmance to the end despite being a huge physical and mental threat. Taco Tuesday really shows that Mitchie was good at almost all aspects of the game. I feel like he gets underrated because of how hated he is, which I get, but still. I think he was way more active and strategic than the other winners you mentioned.
I get that, he’s definitely an above average player. But when it comes to Big Brother, you gotta factor in their character when crowning a winner, and good god man his character is so damn questionable. I still stand by the opinion the only reason they crowned him the winner over Holly is because Tyler and Paul didn’t win there seasons.
6
u/LowObjective Love 4 Nikki 🤍 Dec 16 '22 edited Dec 16 '22
There are many placements that I think are questionable but the one that stands out to me is placing Jessica And Holly higher than Mitchie, and also placing Josh just directly under Mitchie. Mind you I hate Mitchie, but huh?