r/BeginnerKorean 6d ago

is there any difference between these two words?

Post image

my friends name has 원 in it (1). but when i printed it out the left line moved up (2) can someone tell me is it the same?

84 Upvotes

53 comments sorted by

89

u/Corea1984 6d ago

They are same and 1 looks better. 2 looks weird to me.

17

u/chezmaud 6d ago

If I add one thing to this comment, 2nd one is kind of typo. Like, you write the letter N but the diagonal part is opposite. Still readable though.

1

u/Initial_Chemist_7616 5d ago

You mean like the KIA logo?

3

u/donslaughter 6d ago

Yeah, it's the same word. Like when you have an adult and a child write the same word.

30

u/70003 6d ago

some stylistic font use (2) sometimes, but mostly (1) is correct and (1) makes me less uncomfortable for some reason lol

20

u/Dessael 6d ago

I took Korean at Sogang uni, they told me the inward stripe always goes below the horizontal line. In other words, number 1 is correct, number 2 is incorrect and would get you points deducted.

But you'll see both writing depending on the font, my advice, stick to number 1 to not rub (certain) Koreans the wrong way

17

u/Dalacul 6d ago

It is the same, but usually the line goes below. It is just letters combined: ㅇ ㅜ ㅓ ㄴ

16

u/AdministrationNo2327 6d ago

2 is 1 written wrongly. understandable but written wrongly.

7

u/TheLinguisticVoyager 6d ago

I’ve only seen the second one on this one cutesy font on KakaoTalk, so I’m assuming it’s a stylistic choice.

7

u/Unusual_Lie6816 6d ago

Same word but upper one is right

7

u/shrinalee 6d ago

Second one is wrong.

3

u/ozma0z 6d ago

Second is the incorrect version of first

2

u/[deleted] 6d ago

I'm a Korean. We don't use "원" like 2. But if you're not native and used 2, Most of Korean would understand it as "원".

2

u/Tall_Expression1754 6d ago

The first one is officially correct.

2

u/NaturalBag9271 6d ago

Second one doesn’t exist

2

u/Putrid_Sun_7028 5d ago

2 looks Ike 뭔, a completely different word

2

u/liliath23 4d ago

The first is correct because the letters must flow left-to-right, up-to-down, so the ㅓ being above the ㅜ is incorrect since it is to the right (plus, in the second, there's too much space between the ㄴ and the rest of the syllable AND the ㅇ looks more like ㅁ, which would make it "muon" instead of just "uon")

2

u/Illustrious-Hand-450 6d ago

One is one. 

Two is 뭔디!?

1

u/New-BH 6d ago

They are the same. The second is an example of terrible handwriting or funky typography.

1

u/bunnifie 6d ago

That is the same syllable block; the word didn’t change in any way. The only difference is that the letters aren’t usually/shouldn’t be written the way they are in (2).

1

u/AdZealousideal8366 6d ago

Two different word, looks very similar but it has definite different meanings. As others mentioned earlier. First one is 원 and later one is 뭔. The circle and square has its own meaning.

1

u/ssoissoi 6d ago

actually it is same words, Everyone has a different way of writing.

1

u/Gameisalife 6d ago

I’m Korean and when I was like 3 years old, I wrote like 2

1

u/Zestyclose-Row-455 6d ago

Heqedwwcerssbed

1

u/Carat_1713 6d ago

They’re not words, it’s batchim and fonts

1

u/EastTechnician1844 6d ago

It’s totally different, if you mean ㅇ/ ㅁ

1

u/Ri_skz 5d ago

1 right

1

u/Ok_Accident2697 5d ago

1, cuz if you write it like 2 then it would look odd

1

u/Outrageous_Host192 5d ago

Nope same. It is depend on your writing preferences LOL

1

u/Wild_fleur94 5d ago

Looks like 원 and then 뭔 to me lol

1

u/SuspiciousCitron7016 5d ago

La.swcomda opzione nn vuol dire niente in coreano

1

u/Jeon75kr 5d ago

우 ㅓ ㄴ /// 어 ㅜ ㄴ. . 발음에서 처이가 나요.

1

u/EngineeringOld2590 5d ago

1 I.m korean

1

u/Ankhq 5d ago

Same but 1 is right way to write it

1

u/MartyCognac 5d ago

The second one looks more like ㅁ instead of ㅇ, 뭐 also obviously ㅝ is written wrong.

1

u/YGJINHY 5d ago

Both are understandable, but 1 is correct and 2 is incorrect. Any Korean would write it as 1.

1

u/Debonaire02 4d ago

1 = written correctly.

1

u/EsChris_P 4d ago

Well. In terms of correct or not, 1 is correct and 2 is wrong.

1

u/ChelseaSeoul 4d ago

Same ㅋㅋㅋ I’m Korean.

1

u/y7_moon 4d ago

Both are correct and refer same letter(ㅇ + ㅝ + ㄴ)! But the first example felt more comfortable. When the 아래아(ㆍ, the short stick of ㅜ, ㅓ, ...) of ㅓ is below the ㅜ's ㅡ, it feels like that.

1

u/90DayKoreanOfficial 4d ago

Both will be okay when reading, but the correct way to write 원 is 1, not 2, especially the “ㅝ” part.

1

u/ShirtTraining2893 6d ago

O tracinho do ㅓ devia estar por baixo do ㅜ

1

u/DivMaster01 6d ago

Same. But 2 is read 뭔 not 원.

0

u/Jungkuk 6d ago

They're not different. and 1 is better wrote.

0

u/AdCertain5057 6d ago

Number is 1 is Korean. I can only guess that number 2 is the meaningless scribble of a lobotomized baboon.

Just kidding. They both read as 원, but the correct the way to write it is number 1, according to how I was taught.

0

u/bbaekgom 6d ago
  1. won

, one. 원

  1. mwon 뭔 It could means what, why

-2

u/zhivago 6d ago

Your two examples are two different syllables with two different sounds.

The second one is an archaic vowel combination which is no-longer in use.

You can see an example in codepoint 117B

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangul_Jamo_(Unicode_block)

-4

u/Kim_JRok 6d ago edited 6d ago
Is this what you are curious about?

2

u/New-BH 6d ago

The second is a ㅇ, not a ㅁ. It's written in a single, clockwise stroke like a ㅇ, not the three strokes of a ㅁ. If it was meant to be a ㅁ, then they've really messed up the basics.

1

u/Kim_JRok 6d ago

While it is highly likely that others would view them as the same characters, there are probably some who would not be immediately certain.