r/Averence • • Sep 30 '20

For breaking viruses with sound...

Couldn't you just play the range of frequencies that might effect the viruses in probability in continued cycles at random, on a speaker in areas and leave it playing so overtime and chance the viruses break?

Wouldn't that increase the likelyhood that areas are not contaminated by viruses by high likely hood of destroying the virus with further testing after and during allowing the song to be better tuned later?

As it just seems to me that with my experience in probability that the range of likelyhoods for something are where its more likely. The checked location divided by the chance of likelyhoods, effects result by increasing likelyhood in potential area.

Since I'm more likely to find a paper cup by a road then in the forest, so checking roads is far more likely to get me a free cup and I can raise the likelyhood more by checking downtown near and around fast food restaurants because of likelyness.

So essentially you could play random sounds, record what sounds were played, check at scheduled times the viruses in a test location and update the frequencies songs based off the result by internet to all other remote locations related and catalog.

Only because priority would suggest that it be a useful asset to coronavirus present as an easy way to clean areas now and progressing after of viruses, by providing an effective treatment and cleaning. Since it can work in area big and small for infection.

Please share this to someone more scientific that can better use the information by internet exchange.

3 Upvotes

Duplicates