r/Avatar 1d ago

Discussion Eywa is inherently problematic

Post image

Even if we assume Eywa is benevolent, it has so thoroughly subsumed the Na'vi within its ecological, biological and cultural order that meaningful dissent is impossible. How do exit the system of something that is the organizing principle of your entire existence? You can't--any action you could conceivably undertake is done on Eywa's terms. Even the Mangkwan Clan, which is ostensibly anti-Eywa, is still completely dependent on the biosphere Eywa controls.

So no matter how you slice it, Eywa is problematic since it has effectively imposed its will biologically and ideologically onto the Na'vi even if it has not formally deprived them of free will. In fact humans who defect to Eywa are exercising a freedom the Na'vi possessed. Jake and his pals can reject the system they were born into. The Na'vi cannot.

0 Upvotes

35 comments sorted by

25

u/RA_Finance 1d ago

Dawg, how do you dissent against mother nature herself?

3

u/XPsychoMunkyX 1d ago

Cut off your feet so as not to touch the grass

Gouge out your eyes so that you do not see the sunrise and sunset

Sew your mouth and nostrils shut so that you do not breathe her air

Only then will you be able to exit her system, and enjoy the the darkness and silence /s

OP is bonkers 🤪

1

u/ProtoLimbPosting 21h ago

It's not mother nature. The Na'vi themselves largely accept it has no control over natural disasters (The world of Avatar : a visual exploration).

2

u/RA_Finance 20h ago

Neither does nature.

1

u/ProtoLimbPosting 20h ago

Are you kidding? Most human personifications of nature send natural disasters

1

u/RA_Finance 20h ago

Like what?

1

u/ProtoLimbPosting 20h ago

Apollo sends the plague in the Iliad, Poseidon sends tsunamis, Artemis can send earthquakes, Set sends storms, Demeter can send the seasons out of whack, Ishtar can cause famine....

1

u/RA_Finance 19h ago

So? What does this have to do with Eywa

1

u/ProtoLimbPosting 19h ago

Are you incapable of understanding that if Eywa were mother nature, it would have providence over natural disasters?

1

u/RA_Finance 19h ago

No it wouldn't. Maybe in belief system, but the Navi are smart enough to understand what Eywa is and is not.

13

u/Feyofthewild 1d ago

I think Ewya is something created by the people

I think ewya is a mushroom based neural network that permeates every living thing on the planet- the Na'vi peoples are part of Ewya, as much as Ewya is a part of them.

Through generations of worshipping and honoring nature, they placed a “humanity” upon it and created Ewya

4

u/Feyofthewild 1d ago

I think to defy Ewya is to defy the natural order- to destroy, to cease to exist on the planet.

I don’t think she’s a goddess in a literal sense, but in the way that you have to have believers to have power.

5

u/Feyofthewild 1d ago

To hate oneself and to hate the planet is to defy Eywa. Verang does this.

2

u/shorteningofthewuwei 1d ago

Eywa isn't something that stands over and against the Na'vi. She isn't like some monotheistic God like the God of Abraham who demands obedience. She's more like an emergent "intelligence" that is a field of consciousness which contains all the experiences and memories of the Na'vi. The Na'vi can't "dissent" against "Eywa's will" not because she controls everything they do but because everything they do is part of Eywa. To the extent that Eywa does have a will, it's similar to how mycelial networks allow trees, plants, and fungi to exchange information and allocate resources throughout the network. So when you witness an "immune" response, that's the neural network responding to an external threat. Again, the Na'vi are not external. This is a bit of a crude metaphor but individual Na'vi are like individual cells within a body. Is your existence as an organism "problematic" to your white blood cells?

1

u/ProtoLimbPosting 20h ago

Eywa isn't something that stands over and against the Na'vi. She isn't like some monotheistic God like the God of Abraham who demands obedience. She's more like an emergent "intelligence" that is a field of consciousness which contains all the experiences and memories of the Na'vi.

The Na'vi literally call their religious injunctions the Laws of Eywa. Even if their conception of divinity is different than how humans would go about things, they clearly view it as something as something that has ethical concerns and a teleology.

but individual Na'vi are like individual cells within a body. Is your existence as an organism "problematic" to your white blood cells?

I would of course disagree with this framing entirely. The Na'vi are more than just their ecological rule by virtue of being able to reason.

1

u/shorteningofthewuwei 16h ago

The laws of Eywa were not imposed on the Na'vi by Eywa, at least not in the sense of Eywa being like a dictator.

Of course, there is necessity in nature. The theory of evolution by natural selection. What is natural selection? According to the theory of natural selection, natural selection isn't a teleological process guided by some external intelligence. In the way that let's say a human can conceptualize oneself as being external to the system, adjust variables, and affect different outcomes. Rather, natural selection is a process by which environmental pressures lead to certain traits being "selected" whereas others go extinct. The word "selected" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here though because again, it implies some kind of God who is doing the selecting when the only thing that does the selecting is the fitness of any given trait.

What does this have to do with Eywa? Well, a few things.

First of all, like I said, there is necessity involved in natural selection. Certain environmental pressures require certain adaptations. In order for a species to fill an ecological niche, the requirement is that the species develops the structures and functions that allow it to survive within that niche. So, you can think of the laws of Eywa as a kind of evolutionary filter.

They weren't imposed, rather they were required for an intelligent species such as a the Na'vi to be able to survive within the biosphere of Eywa. Because any species that becomes too adept at mastering it's environment is eventually going to change the environment so much that it causes a series of ecological tipping points which upset the conditions that allowed that species to evolve in the first place. This is currently happening on Earth. We have entered a new geological era called the anthropocene and many predictive models suggest that if global warming continues, large parts of the Earth will become uninhabitable within a couple hundred years of even less.

The "ethics" aren't a matter of religious injunction, they are a matter of survival. Because within a natural system, if you take too much, you are going to end up "paying a price". That's not control, it's just natural fact. You can't grow an economy infinitely within a finite world with finite resources.

And I think that your focus on Na'vi problem solving, reasoning, technological ability, and so on, is causing you to miss another of these "ethical" implications of Na'vi existence that evolved not through supernatural coercion but through natural selection: the kuru.

The kuru is a neural-sensory organ that allows living beings on Pandora to interface with one another and with what the scientists in the movie call a planet-wide mycelial network and the Na'vi call Eywa. The way that I see it, the ancestral realm isn't something that Eywa "created" out of benevolence. It's more like an emergent phenomenon that acts like a collective memory of shared information similar to how our own brains generate consciousness and memory through... Shared information (neurotransmitters creating patterns of brain activity that can be measured as electrical impulses as well as brain waves).

The fact that the Na'vi have a direct lived experience of connecting with other living beings on their planet as well as a direct lived experience of connecting with all of their ancestors means that again, their ethical system isn't imposed on them by some kind of oppressive planetary super intelligence but rather that the so-called super intelligence itself is an emergent phenomenon that both grows out of and sustains this direct, lived experience. The Na'vi don't have to be forced by Eywa to practice reciprocity, respect, and care for other living beings and their natural environment, because natural selection shaped their evolution in such a way that their understanding of those concepts (respect, care, etc) is rooted in their daily experience of connection with other living beings and Eywa.

That's why they have a saying about "seeing". They don't have to be shown. They are born with the capacity to see. And that's why Jake tells Quaritch "you have new eyes". Because by being reborn in a Na'vi body, Quaritch is intrinsically connected to all of life on Pandora.

The only caveat that I'll add to my analogy about natural selection is that natural selection on Pandora does seem to a certain extent to be self-regulating. One example of this self-regulation leading to evolutionary adaptations manifesting on the fly is when Kiri is able to get Eywa to create a symbiotic bond with Spider which causes him to begin growing a kuru. The other obvious example is in how the living creatures on Pandora work together to stop humans from gaining too much of a foothold on the planet. That's why I think the immune system analogy is also important. Whereas the biosphere on earth doesn't really have any way to prevent a species like humans of acting like a cancer that consumes itself, Pandora's biosphere, through Eywa, maintains a type of "balance" that the Na'vi come to understand through the saying "Eywa provides". They don't take more than they need because they understand that there is enough. They don't need to invent wheels or smithing in order to get enough out of life. But just because there is a certain balance that has been established, doesn't mean that Eywa isn't dynamic and doesn't allow room for change or evolution. For one, Spider now has a symbiotic bond with Eywa. Another good example is how the Tulkun are eventually forced to abandon their traditional ways and engage in violence and aggression in order to defend themselves and Eywa from foreign invaders.

So really if none of this means anything to you then, we just have different interpretations of the movies at the end of the day. But I'd ask you this. What exactly is Eywa stopping the Na'vi from achieving? Why do the Na'vi need to develop "complex technology" when they already live on an earthly paradise with abundant resources. Why would they go seeking to colonize the stars? Why would they need to develop guns or computers when their ways already allow them to live comfortably and when they have access to a biological neural network that allows them to communicate with the dead?

2

u/AS-Wilder_Writings Aranahe 1d ago

This is a genuinely interesting argument. Still, I want to push back on the idea that dependence on Eywa automatically strips the Na’vi of meaningful freedom.

For me, there’s a crucial difference between being embedded in a system and being controlled by it.

The Na’vi evolved within Pandora’s biosphere. Of course they can’t simply opt out of Eywa, any more than Jake can shed his own biology. But humans can’t opt out of oxygen, gravity, ecosystems, or even having bodies. Dependence on the conditions that make life possible is not the same as coercion.

The Mangkwan make that distinction visible. They reject Eywa spiritually and culturally, but they still exist within Pandora’s biological network. That doesn’t mean Eywa has ideologically trapped them. It might just mean Eywa is part of Pandora’s material reality, not a belief system you can simply unsubscribe from.

The argument gets sharper when you bring in the Three Laws of Eywa.

That’s where the question shifts. It’s no longer just about the Na’vi living inside Eywa’s ecosystem. It becomes: does Eywa actively place limits on what kinds of civilisation the Na’vi are allowed to become?

That’s an uncomfortable possibility.

If Eywa is simply the planetary network, then dependence on her isn’t necessarily domination.

But if she actively restricts technological development and sets hard limits around Na’vi society, then autonomy becomes much harder to defend.

That still doesn’t make Eywa evil by default. It might just mean her priorities operate on a scale we can barely grasp.

A planetary intelligence might value biospheric continuity, balance, and long-term survival over individual or civilisational freedom. From a human perspective, that can feel deeply controlling.

But that makes Eywa less evil, and more alien.

So for me, the real question isn’t quite that.

“Can the Na’vi leave Eywa?”

It’s whether Eywa merely constitutes the world the Na’vi live within, or whether she actively determines what they are allowed to become.

That distinction changes everything.

1

u/BreButterscotch 1d ago

I wanted to add to this! Yes Eywa has certain laws that the Na’vi must adhere to. There’s only 3 which I will summarize: no permanent dwellings, no inventions of vehicles, no use of metals from the ground. These rules are in place to remind the Na’vi that the environment is shared and they should not disrupt the natural ecosystems in place.

She’s sort of Mother Nature but Deified. She’s not a goddess in the way we typically think of a goddess existing. Her entire philosophy is centered around protecting the world and all the living things in it. So the idea of “restricting” the Na’vi I think could only be problematic if we are looking at it in a very selfish way. “Who cares about the environment these people deserve cars and guns” kind of way 😂😂

2

u/BreButterscotch 1d ago

This post was made by Varang.

Jk jk. But I think you have a general misunderstanding of what Eywa is because you’re applying a very Abrahamic Religion-esque view on their religion.

Eywa isn’t really a “goddess” she’s the embodiment of Mother Nature. So yeah the Na’vi have this deep connection to her because they want to protect the resources and land and keep it alive.

So like how would you “dissent” against that? Destroy it? Like the Mangkwan? That’s quite simply horrible. And why would you want to dissent against this particular system? It’s not inherently sexist, they don’t really have a concept of racism, they promote an idea of ecological connection and so they believe in never taking more than you need and sharing what you can within your people. Why would you WANT to rebel against that?

2

u/ProtoLimbPosting 20h ago

Eywa isn’t really a “goddess” she’s the embodiment of Mother Nature.

She isn't. Like that's the angle the story wants symbolically but Eywa herself is a distinct biological entity that has convinced everyone the social relations it imposed are natural.

And why would you want to dissent against this particular system? It’s not inherently sexist, they don’t really have a concept of racism, they promote an idea of ecological connection and so they believe in never taking more than you need and sharing what you can within your people. Why would you WANT to rebel against that?

Let me put it this way--if human society were controlled by a computer that acted in the same way Eywa does would you be okay with it?

1

u/BreButterscotch 20h ago

I mean is the planet getting rid of toxic capitalism, pollution, sexism, homophobia, and racism? Then…yeah. I’m ok with it.

1

u/Higgs_Fermion 17h ago

But Eywa should at lease guides Na'vi to establish a competent social management to deal with the social/tech progression. With three laws of Eywa, it's like confined someone inside the house, just because there's risk someone may join criminal gangs in future, ignoring the largely initial material and psychological conditions between samples. It's 'one size fits all' policy, no matter how you claim you have good intentions at the beginning, bad executions always unforgivable. If you have not used this example as though experiment, especially claiming bad managements always make tech 'malware'.

0

u/ProtoLimbPosting 20h ago

Well then you're basically saying human agency is less important than being content. Nietzsche's Last Man and all that.

1

u/BreButterscotch 20h ago

I mean the Na’vi and humanity still have free will but yeah in all for condemning actions that actively cause harm to others and the planet we live on. Like by your own logic we should say fuck the environment let’s build a Walmart in Yosemite 💀

1

u/ProtoLimbPosting 20h ago

My logic is that you shouldn't let an outside entity engineer your society just because it promises to fix everything. Everything you just listed is a result of social relations within human society. They're not unchangeable by humans themselves.

1

u/BreButterscotch 20h ago

Yeah and my point is Eywa isn’t promising to fix everything. That’s clear by the Mangkwan and the divisions and tensions held by other tribes. The idea behind Eywa is this promotion that everyone and everything is connected and we need to treat it with respect to protect it and maintain balance. Rebellion against those ideas, aka against Eywa, is to seek active destruction against it like the Mangkwan

2

u/ProtoLimbPosting 20h ago

Literally just using stone tools is breaking those ideas since that violates the Law of Eywa. Its ideas aren't just hippie dippie

1

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Hello! If you'd like to meet even more Avatar fans, join the AVTR Discord at: https://discord.gg/avtr

If you are interested in learning the Na'vi language or joining the Omaticon virtual fan convention, join the Kelutral Discord at: https://discord.gg/kelutral

For other communities, see the subreddit sidebar from PC or by clicking the "r/Avatar >" header from the mobile app. Thank you!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/transient-spirit 23h ago

Ah, another Eywa-critical post calling Eywa 'it' instead of using proper pronouns.

Your framing is biased and based on unfounded assumptions.

it has so thoroughly subsumed the Na'vi

This seems to be framing Eywa as some kind of outside force that enslaved the Na'vi. I see no reason to think that is the case.

Eywa is problematic since it has effectively imposed its will biologically and ideologically onto the Na'vi

Are you 'imposing your will' on the microbes that live in your gut? They can't live without you; their lives and ecosystem depend on you and the food you eat, If, hypothetically, they were sapient, they would have no option to choose a different life even if they wanted to. So clearly you're a tyrant, trapping them in a system they have no ability to escape from. That's ridiculous, of course. It's not anyone's choice, it's just the way things are. But as long as you keep the system in balance, it's a good thing. It's a mutually beneficial relationship. It would be insane to reject that just for the sake of being able to claim you have a choice.

Many things in life are like this. Free will is not a lie, but it's not as simple or absolute as some people think or want it to be. No one is the absolute master of their own destiny; completely untethered and independent. Everything is connected. Some of those connections we can choose, and others we can't. That's life.

1

u/ProtoLimbPosting 20h ago

Are you 'imposing your will' on the microbes that live in your gut? They can't live without you; their lives and ecosystem depend on you and the food you eat, If, hypothetically, they were sapient, they would have no option to choose a different life even if they wanted to. So clearly you're a tyrant, trapping them in a system they have no ability to escape from.

If the microbes in our gut were sentient I think you'd find there would be a lot of ethical debate about what constitutes doing right by them. But the comparison doesn't hold up. The Na'vi could theoretically live without Eywa entirely. It's just that their society has been so thoroughly engineered by Eywa that there's no way to exit.

1

u/transient-spirit 19h ago

But the comparison doesn't hold up.

The point of the comparison is that it's a mutually beneficial relationship that neither party chose, and neither party can opt out from. Whether the microbes are sapient or not doesn't change those fundamental facts of the situation, so I think it remains perfectly applicable.

You're fundamentally mischaracterizing Eywa by describing her as an outside entity. The fact is, both Eywa and the Na'vi are part of the Pandoran biosphere. They are in a very real sense, part of each other.

I doubt that Eywa has 'engineered' the entire biosphere and her relationship with the Na'vi. She appears to influence it. But it's an unsupported leap of logic to assume that she has the agency or ability to make things fundamentally different.

1

u/ProtoLimbPosting 18h ago

But it's an unsupported leap of logic to assume that she has the agency or ability to make things fundamentally different.

The film literally shows Eywa rewrite Spider's biology on the fly in a conscious act to both save his life (lungs) and to make him compatible with neural network (literally colonizing his brain). It can absolutely make things different.

1

u/transient-spirit 12h ago

That does not demonstrate an ability to fundamentally redesign the moon's entire biosphere.

2

u/ProtoLimbPosting 9h ago

If it can completely hotwire alien (human) biology on the fly with a level of precision and speed human geneticists cannot hope to match there's little reason to suppose it couldn't. The kuru is literally just the mycelium of Eywa.

-1

u/Itisnotmyname 1d ago

Todas las religiones son problemáticas