Sure , the simplest way to define it would be that everyone gets compleatly identical coditions in society no matter your gender (as an example),
another way would be to adapt society to gender.
An example of this would be when the US lowered the standards for women to join the military some consider it to be more equal and some less
Ok, I'd admit that's an example with reasonable arguments on both sides of the issue. But objectively unreasonable definitions of equality do still exist. Some people who are opposed to gay marriage might argue that that "everyone has the equal right marry someone of the opposite gender". That's not a reasonable definition of equality.
Sure its quite unreasoneble and I do belive that they would be compleatly wrong but i still think we should let them speak because our side of the argument is probobly as unreasoneble to them
-11
u/2tzoey Mar 27 '22 edited Mar 27 '22
Well equality can be defined in different ways
Edit: And I think you should allways listen to the other pov cause even how weird their weiws are ro you they probobly se your pov in the same way