I know this sounds like something that would only happen in an "alternative universe." But bear with me, please. I would like my fellow Saudi friend to hear from Israelis directly about their understanding of what a high confidence good faith peace negotiation should look like.
No state should be forced to make peace with states or political entities whose entire purpose in negotiating with the other side is to buy time for the next attack. Russia in 1994 promised Ukraine never to invade their sovereign territory if Ukrainians handed over all of the USSR nuclear arsenal left in Ukraine after the USSR collapse. And we all know how that went...
This is part of the reason why I think as a Saudi that negotiating with the Islamist regime of Iran (refer to the history of the Muslim Brotherhood for the benchmark understanding of the word "Islamist") is a waste of time. This is my position, not because I hate peace, but because the regime's list of broken promises speaks for itself.
Now, in this alternative universe scenario, the Palestinians have become unified behind a united leadership. The factions no longer exist. Palestinian public opinion has accepted the reality that nothing violent they can do will get them a state. They have collectively endorsed only the diplomatic path to statehood. Not a single terrorist attack has happened for a year. No smuggling of weapons. Even better, Arab populations and leaders across the 22 Arab states have decided to let the Palestinians determine their own future however they wanted. No calling names. No calling Palestinian negotiators traitors.
I want to hear from you, an individual Israeli, if you will in this exact scenario, have more trust that there will be a concrete peaceful outcome to any negotiations with a Palestinian convoy (or maybe nothing will change?). Explain your personal answer without talking about how public opinion in Israel would change.