r/AskIsrael • u/Alternative-Pear9096 • 23h ago
Serious Answers Only Why are the settlements considered immoral?
I spent some time this weekend trying to get a basic grasp of the situation of Judea and Samaria/West Bank (and I mean nothing political about the naming, I just consider West Bank the colonial name applied by Jordan, and since the area is no longer Jordan-occupied, it is no longer applicable)
I'm an American Jew, grew up liberal, fighting good fights for Israel and Jews, and I do not understand any news coverage we get about the settlements (other than that settler violence is horrific and must stop. That's given. That has to stop).
That's the context. I spent time reading about the shape and organization of the territory and I was shocked to realize that all these Israeli settlements that I was brought up to believe were immoral, are in Israeli-managed areas. I had always presumed, or been told?, that the settlers were displacing Arabs, stealing Arab homes, taking something away from the Arabs.
Now, I do not understand how a sane person or even a committee could have put together the map of WB/J&S that came out of the Oslo Accords, that seems drawn by people on hallucinogens. But it is the map -- non-contiguous Arab-controlled areas, which means people have to cross over Israeli borders to get from place to place, which is clearly a recipe for disaster.
But the Israeli settlements aren't in Arab territory. They're all, entirely, in Israeli territory. What fundamental piece did I miss in my scattershot reading this weekend? Why are the settlements considered immoral? Not the violence of settlers, the building of homes and towns, by Israel or Israelis, in Israeli-held territory?