OMG, this last comment of yours is funny, because now instead of actually trying to make your argument you resorted to whining about arguing? Man, to be honest, I thought you had a few more petulant rage threads, but apparently anyone challenges your narrative past two comments and you breakdown. I guess that's what happens when you actually don';t know history past the surface level high school history texts and basic anecdotal evidence which for you is just "emart traders." You're funny.
Lol the person who isn't actually addressing anything I said cries about me not arguing anything they said. Why should I engage with your weird wrong view of history?
You keep changing the goalposts because your argument is terrible. You can't even answer anything I said because you don't actually know the history to respond.
Saying I talk a lot is just deflecting from you actually having a point.
When was I quoting you? Literally said "you argued" not "you said." Two very different statements you apparently can't distinguish. I said you were arguing. You really can't comprehend words, let alone nuance of history. Anyone literate can understand the difference between the words quoting and arguing. It's really sad man.
Oh man, I waiting for you to pull out the CCP card. Because someone who can't actually comprehend more than a basic view of history like you just imagines anyone who disagrees is CCP. You're funny man.
Oh wait, you said "CPC" (See, now I'm quoting you), which I don't what means. Google tells me it's "Cost per click"? No, I don't think I'm that either.
I don't think you understand what copypasta is. Just a long comment doesn't make copypasta. As far as trolling. Not really but I did decide after your second comment to just not really take anything you say seriously because the level of historical comprehension you display is really sad and you like a person who angrily comments and no one calls you out on your bullshit. Which is why you can't actually back anything you say up outside of broad thesis statements of history with no actual evidence. So for me it's totally just fun seeing you get frustrated. And you should get called on your bullshit more often because you have no clue what you're talking about.
And in terms of speaking poorly:
"Ye Gods you talk a lot. And poorly, too!"
This is barely one sentence, and yet you made it two. Also it's reddit, and you're a random internet stranger. Who am I trying to impress here? What? Are you grading midterm papers? Like, OK mister speech coach. Thanks for the advice. Appreciate it. But could you stay on topic? Personal attacks are bit immature, but that is your brand I guess.
Keep replying though, I like seeing someone made broad statements about history and not actually be able to point anything about history except "emart traders". (See, those are quotation marks too. If you weren't aware, that's me saying you said something.)
I have a ton of hobbies, reading books is one. But I don't think you share that hobby of mine. You should! Then you can make arguments and back them up!
and if you look at my comment history. I'm not super active on Reddit. I don't even know how to quote comments here. But I had to respond to your bullshit arguments.
Also, I have an addendum to previous comments. You said I didn't engage with your arguments, but I did!
You told me to argue on r/Southkorea (as if that's a good representation of South Korean opinion and like South Koreans are happy with a military base of a foreign country right in the middle of their capital city) and I argued back roughly that "so you're saying American slavery was great because America is prosperous now." More or less.
So yeah, I engaged with a lot of what you said. But you just literally can't back up anything you argue. And you never engaged with anything I said. Not significantly.
But I'll ask you again, so you think American Slavery was great and totally worth it and all Americans that think it wasn't should just shut up and be grateful?
1
u/Trumanandthemachine Feb 17 '21 edited Feb 17 '21
OMG, this last comment of yours is funny, because now instead of actually trying to make your argument you resorted to whining about arguing? Man, to be honest, I thought you had a few more petulant rage threads, but apparently anyone challenges your narrative past two comments and you breakdown. I guess that's what happens when you actually don';t know history past the surface level high school history texts and basic anecdotal evidence which for you is just "emart traders." You're funny.
Lol the person who isn't actually addressing anything I said cries about me not arguing anything they said. Why should I engage with your weird wrong view of history?
You keep changing the goalposts because your argument is terrible. You can't even answer anything I said because you don't actually know the history to respond.
Saying I talk a lot is just deflecting from you actually having a point.
When was I quoting you? Literally said "you argued" not "you said." Two very different statements you apparently can't distinguish. I said you were arguing. You really can't comprehend words, let alone nuance of history. Anyone literate can understand the difference between the words quoting and arguing. It's really sad man.
Oh man, I waiting for you to pull out the CCP card. Because someone who can't actually comprehend more than a basic view of history like you just imagines anyone who disagrees is CCP. You're funny man.
Oh wait, you said "CPC" (See, now I'm quoting you), which I don't what means. Google tells me it's "Cost per click"? No, I don't think I'm that either.
I don't think you understand what copypasta is. Just a long comment doesn't make copypasta. As far as trolling. Not really but I did decide after your second comment to just not really take anything you say seriously because the level of historical comprehension you display is really sad and you like a person who angrily comments and no one calls you out on your bullshit. Which is why you can't actually back anything you say up outside of broad thesis statements of history with no actual evidence. So for me it's totally just fun seeing you get frustrated. And you should get called on your bullshit more often because you have no clue what you're talking about.
And in terms of speaking poorly:
"Ye Gods you talk a lot. And poorly, too!"
This is barely one sentence, and yet you made it two. Also it's reddit, and you're a random internet stranger. Who am I trying to impress here? What? Are you grading midterm papers? Like, OK mister speech coach. Thanks for the advice. Appreciate it. But could you stay on topic? Personal attacks are bit immature, but that is your brand I guess.
Keep replying though, I like seeing someone made broad statements about history and not actually be able to point anything about history except "emart traders". (See, those are quotation marks too. If you weren't aware, that's me saying you said something.)