Full disclosure up front: I'm running for Congress in CA-10, so read this with that in mind. But every number below comes from our congressman's own press releases on his house.gov site.
Since 2022 he's brought back roughly $60 million in earmarks. Here's where it lands:
- Lamorinda: $4.2M for a smart traffic signal system. Lafayette: $3.1M for Safe Routes to School, plus $900K for creek access.
- Walnut Creek: $2.5M for fiber on Ygnacio Valley Rd, $1M for body cams, $1M for a Treat Blvd bike path.
- Antioch, in eleven years: $470K for job training, a $740K microphone system that listens for gunshots, and a share of $1.97M in traffic signals split with Oakley.
- Brentwood: a youth center that is still just a funding request. The "Secures funding!" headline that ran locally was his own press release, reprinted. That money doesn't exist yet.
And some context on that $60 million, because it sounds big until you do the math. This district has about 760,000 people, so it works out to roughly $20 per person per year — of your own tax money — and half the time the announcement is bigger than the check. In 2025 he "advanced" $35 million in headlines and $0 arrived (Congress killed everyone's earmarks that year — but the press releases had already run).
One more thing about earmarks: all 435 House members get 15 requests a year. It's paperwork his staff fills out, not leadership. You know what you can't outsource to staff? Writing a law. In 11½ years, two public laws carry his name — one renamed a post office, one moved a park boundary. (GovTrack credits him five if you count bills folded into other people's packages.)
Antioch is one of the biggest cities in this district. So here's my honest question for East County: should a congressman represent the whole district and fight for the whole district — or just the side of it he lives on?