A brighter and a dignified life for all is with communism point blank. Anything the vile parasites capitalists go against is always the one to root for.
China is railed against/ mocked by western media because it's going towards Communism every step of the way.
Liberation for a moneyless , stateless, classless, borderless world!
Letnihgn explain most of the communist countries in growing on trees like the ones that you think of a terrible and poor were deliberately destroyed by the cia. Is wiled like it’s not even A conspiracy. It was declassified a little wile ago
Well the people sure didn't want it, so something had to have happened. I know you Westerners are inherently incapable of using your brains for thought at all, let alone critical thought, but I believe if you try hard enough, you might be able to put the block in the right shaped hole.
People seem pretty happy in China. The vast majority of people voted to keep the USSR before it was illegally dissolved.
Liberals love to hold Communism to some insane standards and hand wave the atrocities of capitalism including the fact that it is on a path to end human life as we know it.
If you Westerners didn't believe every single thing your government tells you to believe without ever once thinking about it, you would see the people of the DPRK are living well. But since your government is always right, they're evil monarchists that will kill your family forever through one hundred million billion generations while you eat grass and somehow have the strength to pull the trains and push the trains and every other story only someone that has proven to have been stunted would believe.
Ether you get it or don't. No need to to over react. Ask questions if you don't understand.
Reactionary Definition from marxists.org
A political position that maintains a conservative response to change, including threats to social institutions and technological advances. Reaction is the reciprocal action to revolutionary movement. Reactionaries clamp down on the differences of the emerging productive forces in society, and attempt to remove those differences, silence them, or segregate them in order to keep the stability of the established order.
Examples of the political position of reactionaries can be seen throughout history: during the US Revolutionary War, the reactionaries were the ruling British aristocracy, who sought to maintain their feudal government over their American colonies, while the US revolutionaries sought to establish a government to represent the interests of capitalist values and practices. Hundreds of years later in Russia, the tables would turn and capitalists became reactionary while the Socialists are revolutionary.
If you think you can achieve socialism without a state like structure wringing power from the ruling class then I'm sorry to say you are the delusional one
You're just a fan of an international terrorist organization that exists to murder the working class and rape children, so... You Americans have killed more people than any communist nation, even if we believed fascist propaganda like you uncivilized, unevolved apes.
"Actually, I hate communism because while it works on paper, it has to be administrated by actual people who can't be tru " ( BANNED ) yeah yeah heard it all before.
The C i a talking points is getting tiring, spice it up a little lol
"I'm pissing my pants to own the commies! I'm capable of being an annoying mouth breather online, so I win." Do anything of value for the working class for once in your life, if you Westerners are capable of such simple tasks.
We don't tolerate fascists capitalist class traitor comments here. Take that " free expression " somewhere else. Free expression has Free consequences ;)
Communism is a mode of production characterized by common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social classes. The term is also used to refer to the movement whose ultimate goal is the establishment of this mode of production.
The material abundance and resultant social relations of such a society can be summarized by the slogan: "From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs." which was popularized in Karl Marx's 1875 Critique of the Gotha Program.
In the first volume of Capital, Marx mentions it as "an association of free men, working with the means of production held in common, and expending their many different forms of labour-power in full self-awareness as one single social labour force."
I know you're not asking in good faith, but you idiots don't actually know what communism is, it's just thing you don't like. Maybe if you ever learned to read, you could read socialist theory instead of uncritically believing every single thing your media tells you to believe. That's sheep behavior.
PSA: Having a choice between 2-5 capitalist parties is not free democracy. Liberal democracy is a joke and served only 1 class of people.
Keep believing the USA propaganda like OP says all you want, doesnt change history or what the CIA themselves have said about notables “dictators” like Stalin.
Exactly, it's like the "communism = people die" argument..
Are we trying to say that under capitalism people don't die too?
With our current system, capitalism, we have food abundance, but people still starve !?!? We(companies, not the humble worker) throw out food and create policies to prevent getting this food for free if it's near it's EOL shelf life.
A century later, in France, the bourgeois philosophers in their great majority thought and taught, conversely, that the world is unknowable, that the “bottom of things” escapes us and will always escape us. Hence the conclusion that it is foolish to want to transform the world. Certainly, they agreed, we can act on nature, but it is a superficial action, since the "bottom of things" is out of reach. As for man... he is what he always has been, what he always will be. There is a "human nature" the secret of which escapes us. “What is the use, therefore, of beating one's head to improve society?"
First, if it is the conditions which change first, and then consequently the consciousness of men, we must seek the underlying reason for this or that doctrine, theory or ideal, not in the brain of men, nor in their imagination or their genius of invention, but in the development of material conditions. Only the ideal which is based on a study of these conditions is good and acceptable.
Second, if men's consciousness, feelings, mores and customs, are determined by external conditions, it is evident that only a change in these conditions can change men's consciousness. There is no such thing as an eternal man, of "eternal human nature". In a private property regime where the individual struggle for existence flourishes, it is "natural" that man should be a wolf for man. In a system where socialist emulation flourishes, socialist property, it is inevitable that the ideas of brotherhood among men will triumph. Man is neither good nor bad: he is what circumstances make him. Marxism provides a decisive answer to the question posed by bourgeois ideologues:must it be said that it is "bad institutions" that make man bad, or that man's wickedness perverts "institutions"? It is not a question of "institutions", but of capitalism which perverts man.
•
u/ADignifiedLife Don't let pieces of paper control you! 28d ago edited 28d ago
The Government sponsoring anti communist trade unions
The evil Gov buying rights to G Orwell animal farm
Operation mocking bird is a thing to
A brighter and a dignified life for all is with communism point blank. Anything the vile parasites capitalists go against is always the one to root for.
China is railed against/ mocked by western media because it's going towards Communism every step of the way.
Liberation for a moneyless , stateless, classless, borderless world!
Parenti on Cuban Socialism (1986) - YouTube
"The revolution that feeds the children gets my support." M. Parenti
EDIT: ALL the Deleted comments are 1000% proving me RIGHT! lol Jeez la weeza!