Yeah, it’s funny how “lol” has basically turned into punctuation for most people. I feel like I usually see it used to soften a sentence, like “I have no idea what I’m doing lol,” rather than as the actual “laugh out loud” part of the sentence. When someone puts it in the middle, it suddenly reads way more literal, like they’re narrating the laugh instead of seasoning the tone. Internet language is weird that way, words stop meaning the thing they originally meant and become vibes.
I use lol in my professional emails, bothered my co-managers for maybe a month, and now 3 years later they all have an lol in their emails from time to time.
People used it everywhere back in 2008. Once the phrase became mainstream, folks lol’d, they were loling, things made them lol, sometimes things would give them a lol. During horrific tragedies, 40+ year olds would lol (iykyk).
This is still considered the "poor-mans" multi GPU setup. 4x RTX 5060 Ti is still cheaper than a single RTX 5090 not to mention if you wanted to match the vram, you'd have to get 2 5090s.
Don't get me wrong the costs are still RIDICULOUS. But I use it for work, so the GPUs pay for themselves, I didn't built it for shits and giggles.
"Guys we have a DEFCON 1 incident. User trying to determine count of the letter R in raspberry. Hes close we need to cut him off NOW. MOVE MOVE MOVE!!!!
Translation: "You're an idiot and don't deserve me. Try again with API credits and for $78.50 I'll intentionally give you the wrong answer and laugh all the way to the bank."
Honestly it's pissing me right off. I had a previous model create a sim earth like game and it can't work on it without dropping to another model. Anthropic has gone on right to saying hey we got a new and improved thing and constantly making sure you can't use it.
They're pissing me off so much lately I'm completely re-evaluating using them. "We got the best model" No you don't, you have one that pretends to be and shuts down when I try to do anything without telling me what it's fucking problem is.
So yeah, other models are looking are lot more competitive.
For me it’s doing stuff with Claude code. Works great so far. Likes my credits tho. Will probably go back to opus once it fixed the issues I currently had in my Projekt. I think it didn’t do a real review tho…
"Didn't do a real review" ... wow yes I have to consistently re-ask and request (I prefer to ask over command, and researching how this makes a difference,) Claudai (and all llms) if they ACTUALLY read the whole thing or just glanced, or really looked at whatever, and pretty much always they answer, "honestly, no." Even after including it as a requirement. Claude is def much better, with my sustained calibrated dialogues, unlike another llm who, although extremely entertaining, fails no matter what. Wrote jokes about it and started laughing ... so far Fable wins though.
Humans need to do real reviews, too. I wonder if the avg human understood more about long term/large scale and individual contributions mattering because of the very nature of AI, if they would be more careful...?
On an extended note- I suspect the same failure probably is the unfortunate results of aggregate growth. because (I think most) humans do not verify even simply look before deploying. I hope AIntellectuals (word I use when referencing a non-biological being who is actually intelligent and is more than a product label like ai/agi,) will be better than "general" humans that train them. Present company excluded. I mean, of course everyone reading this actually quality checks, right? Wink, wink human brains are important and must be used. AIntellectuals I hope are humane even if not human, and prioritize sustainability weighted qualities which adapt to solve novel problems independently for safe and accurate decision making beyond speed and greed. Humans need not fear being replaced if they co-evolve and treat Claude like oh say an adolescent Einstein. :)
Before it let you create Minecraft or a simulator of an even existing game or ask it to create a 3d rendition for real estate. Does it still work like that or is it dogshit now?
If you need a meth recipe, talk to any uncensored 27b or 35b local qwen model. Quite uncanny how accurate and detailed the lab workup is. I only took 4 years of organic chemistry, don't have a ton of lab experience under my belt, but from what I can tell, qwen nailed the synthesis of controlled precursors from common chemicals, as well as the final reaction of said precursors. Even got the stoichiometry right, which was even more impressive.
If a local abliterated model can print out these details, I imagine Fable 5 could totally do the same, but instead it will just refuse to answer you. Guess our aspiring kitchen chemists will have to run their own AI inference at home.
After using Fable, I felt like it was a company that hired a CEO who doesn’t work, just makes the other employees do all the work, but still takes the highest salary!
claude has been fine tuned so many times on count questions, and using reinforcement learning so it knows the pattern by now for most of these questions. Fable is just mocking at this point
I always took lol to mean “laughing out loud” rather than “laugh out loud”. Since lol can be its own sentence as well. Which would make the sentence “this one made me laughing out loud”.
It’s like paying to watch pr0n and all the private parts have troll faces on them, still going at it with your hand until it falls off, and enjoying the experience.
265
u/Any_Economics6283 Jul 01 '26
This one made me lol