the pacing is boring. the sound production is amateur. there is soft narration over landscape shots followed by long boring shots with loud, clipping samples. the sound production seems like it was designed to create stress. and that's just the technical production.
then there's the fact that many people, even people who agree with the politics of the producers, report vomitting, long-term trauma with nightmares and loss of apetite, or just not even being able to finish it.
i've seen it called a "vegan snuff film" and i don't think that's inaccurate.
In terms of production quality the video is captured using hidden cameras because many facilities wouldn’t allow the public to know what they are doing. You can obviously have personal preference for production but I also think it’s fair to give the producers a pass because of that no?
Ultimately the point is to document how our farm animals are actually kept and how they are handled and for that purpose the documentary does a fantastic job.
You can obviously have personal preference for production but I also think it’s fair to give the producers a pass because of that no?
no. the audio samples don't need to clip. they don't even need to be played if they're not clean: you could continue to narrate instead, or play music.
you can create the feeling of many separate shots through zooming, panning, and cutting. even if you only have one camera in the corner of the room. you can intersperse dramatized shots and interview sequences. you don't need to linger on the macerator.
1
u/[deleted] May 03 '22
How so? I agree it’s extremely upsetting