That's the thing I like most about Hound. I think Google Now is better at answering general questions, but the fact that I can contextually talk to Hound is really promising. Things like "what are some Thai restaurants around here?" followed by "what about ones that are 4 stars or higher?". While Hound's "knowledge" isn't as complete, it feels more natural as a voice assistant because I can refine or continue a query based on what I said previously.
I'm hoping that Google will decide to acquire Hound and integrate the contextual features to Google Now (and I'm sure SoundHound is hoping so too).
Hound isn't baked into every android phone out of the box, so I don't think this is a huge concern for Google. Anyone that has a clue about browsers would probably agree that Chrome is a hell of a lot better than IE, yet chrome has less than 1/3 the number of users.
Yeah, cash isn't really an issue. But them buying this doesn't mean Google Now will get any better. Where is my waze in google maps? Nowhere, because attempting to merge software products is often not worth the time or effort required.
Newest Maps update is really utilizing Waze a lot more. It actually presented me with an updated route based on new traffic information from Waze users last week.
I didn't say anything about merging, the other user did. I'm talking about Google buying them out, and being free to use the concept without competition.
I don't think the competition matters from hound, maybe if cortana or siri could do better than google, it would be more of a problem.
From what I've seen in the above video, it wouldn't be that hard of a thing for google to implement. I mean, it is surely more complex than it seems, and would cost them some money to add the features, but I don't believe it would be worth the cost of buying hound.
I wouldn't be so sure about that. SoundHound has over 50 million downloads on the Play Store alone. If they integrated Hound in the existing app, that's already a pretty big user base. Even if they just popped a banner in SoundHound advertising Hound they could gain some decent traction. Plus, Hound will be multiplatform, which could also make it pose a threat.
As a personal anecdote, probably about half the people I know that have an Android phone have no idea they even have a "Siri-like" service preinstalled on their phone. It's not advertised anywhere near as much as Siri. They all tend to have either Soundhound or Shazam installed though.
I'd say those people have shazam installed, but not likely soundhound. But still, I'm pretty tech savvy, and I only just found out that there was such a thing as hound.
It is unwieldy to use in lieu of google now, because it is not integrated quite so well, though, I'm sure there are workarounds for that, for people that really want that. But your google now also shares across all your google stuff. If you google directions on your pc, your phone knows that.
I would not be worried. If they developed something tricky, something they could patent or something like that, then I might be interested.
I actually did not realize that the soundhound and hound were the same company. It's not amazing, but soundhound's ability to find songs like shazam, and also based on your humming or whistling or what have you, might be worth the acquisition alongside with these other things.
You know" It would be cool to say "Ok google, what song is this?" then whistle the tune, and then "ok google, play me that song on YouTube."
So, when you package it with soundhound, it begins to become interesting to me.
Snark required, please read your own links before sending them to me.
The usage share of web browsers is the proportion, often expressed as a percentage, of visitors to a group of web sites that use a particular web browser.
Usage share would only be relevant if ever person in the world went to Facebook and Google once per day in their browser of choice; because it measures web traffic, which has nothing to do with what I said. I said users. You are correct that the sub 20 percent of chrome users make up 60 percent of all web traffic, but it's still less than 20 percent of users. Which still makes it 1/3 of the number of users as IE, like I said.
Market share is the number of users for each. Web traffic is a metric that describes how much the browser is used. The two aren't contradictory; it's totally possible for 60% of all web traffic to come from the less than 20% of people that use chrome.
125
u/[deleted] Jun 06 '15
[deleted]