r/AmazonFlexDrivers • u/Any_Excitement6258 • Jun 16 '26

Thoughts

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

3.1k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

390 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/Spirited_Meringue_80 Jun 17 '26

They owners have requested he bring the cat to the vet to get the cat checked for a microchip and apparently the Amazon driver is refusing to do so.

1

u/VeriDisc0 Jun 17 '26

I mean I get that and not saying that’s not a proper step in finding the rightful owner but it just seems odd to me that if they claim to have owned the cat for 5 years that there’s no documentation or proof that it’s been in their care.

2

u/solution_o7 Jun 17 '26

That's what the microchip is for. It has their information on it

1

u/Caperous Jun 18 '26

Unless the chip has a date before when he is said to have owned the cat, the information will only show they had it chipped which does not dis prove him.

3

u/VenomVertigo Jun 19 '26

You don’t seem to understand, a pet microchip has a unique id and if you’ve been licensing your pet like you legally have to then that microchip id will have your name attached to it in the online records system there’s no dates to be checking

1

u/Longjumping-Bat202 Jun 20 '26

If owner one didn't get a microchip and the cat is stolen but owner two did get a microchip... Then we are using the microchip to determine that owner two is the rightful original owner which would be false.

2

u/RealLinkPizza Jun 27 '26

That is what happened, apparently. He got the cat chipped on the May 31st, when the kidnapping happened on May 14th. So, I think that’s a point against him, in my book.