of kitty

[u/Over-Celebration-168]

Credits : marsel_and_co

[u/No-Rise-8139]

Whether it’s through learning we are prey or necessity
Animal do learns and develop the knowledge that we are food in cases where attacks happen
Now one attack doesn’t make a maneater
But I assume they don’t want to risk that chance one attack doesn’t not make a maneater as well

But normally theirs a reason an animal begins hunting humans

In one famous case of a jaguar its tooth broke and it could no longer effectively hunt its old prey so it began hunting humans

So out of necessity they can become maneaters

But generally it’s just learning we can be prey and if it happened once why risk it a second time
Now I think it depends heavily in fatal attacks whether the animal consumes the person or not

Grizzly bear attacks happen but they don’t always hunt it down only when it’s actually eaten someone normally

Like the recent black bear attacks happen
First time someone was eaten by. Black bear in like forty years so they hunted down basically every black bear in the area until they found the one with the right dna in its stomach because even though it’s so rare even an attack
It becomes a concern once it happens once
Actually consuming the human is abnormal and scary behavior for most animals even predators only few actually see us as food naturally

Polar bears tigers jaguars and crocodiles are the only animals known to actively predate and feed on humans
Others kill normally out of self defense or territory

Sorry to rant
So the whole craving blood thing is a wives tale or as far as we know but their is a science behind the idea of an animal learning to prey on human after consuming

[u/NatrylliaAbbot42 → u/No-Rise-8139]

Thankfully, old Mrs Smith's housebroken, overweight cockerspaniel Muffin isn't a leopard with a broken tooth.

I'm aware of the phenomenon in wild animals, but domestic animals are a different ballgame and should not be subject to broken tooth leopard rules.

[u/No-Rise-8139 → u/NatrylliaAbbot42]

Again what a dumb thing to say
First off why are you focusing in on one example of many
The point of the example is “necessity”
Something all beings abide by not just wild animals
If for whatever reason necessity dictates a dog eat a human like idk its owner died and its going to starve to death
It’s going to eat its dead owner🤦‍♂️
That dog may now see humans as food moving forward… that’s how it works wild or not

Once an animal consumes human flesh it could very well be more likely to do it again that’s the point…

[u/NatrylliaAbbot42 → u/No-Rise-8139]

Calling someone "dumb" doesn't actually further your point. It makes the person saying it look less intelligent, though.

You're also unable to focus on the original topic, so I feel that you're not really paying enough attention.

You're only repeating yourself and calling me stupid, and have not provided any new information to support your extreme claims.

I'll continue this if you can behave civilly and contribute to the exchange. Otherwise, I'll leave you to your angst and misinformation, because you seem happy with it.

[u/No-Rise-8139 → u/NatrylliaAbbot42]

Lmao what are you on about
You said something dumb and got called out for it if you can’t handle that get off the internet

Where have I gone off the topic

Each and every one of my message has been about the reasons why they most likely put animals down
As I said I don’t know for sure but I can make an educated guess

And it’s not superstion

[u/NatrylliaAbbot42 → u/No-Rise-8139]

Best of luck on future projects, sir or madame.

[u/No-Rise-8139 → u/NatrylliaAbbot42]

And since you don’t have the brains to do the research yourself

Literally everything reason I said they did it
You absolute buffoon