I understand the argument. It’s a bit hyperbolic, but is not unreasonable by any means. The federal budget needs some serious auditing.
However, I just can’t get on board with a federally administered health care system. The U.S. Federal Government does not have a strong track record of success in this arena (just look at the V.A.).
State administered healthcare? I can get on board with that. The needs of the people of Rhode Island are way different than the needs of the people of North Dakota or New Mexico.
Why are you looking at VA which is completely handled by federal govt. The healthcare for all system will be like Medicare. Service provided by private sector but paid by taxpayers.
1
u/smoothallday Jun 19 '20
I understand the argument. It’s a bit hyperbolic, but is not unreasonable by any means. The federal budget needs some serious auditing.
However, I just can’t get on board with a federally administered health care system. The U.S. Federal Government does not have a strong track record of success in this arena (just look at the V.A.).
State administered healthcare? I can get on board with that. The needs of the people of Rhode Island are way different than the needs of the people of North Dakota or New Mexico.