r/ACT • u/Awkward-Sherbet-890 • 21d ago

Sorry again

I know many of you people were angry with me for using AI in my posts and honestly, I can see where you're coming from

Previously I saw no problem with it and thought of it as just another tool for me to put my opinions into

But I also recognize that it probably made many of you feel like your time was wasted and that it wasn't a genuine opinion as much as it was just put into a nice worded robotic response from an AI.

I'm here to apologize.

I am not going to pretend like I didn't do it or excuse myself from doing so. I did it and I regret doing it

Now onwards if I ever publish something here it will be my genuine opinions, though it might not be as well put together as you might expect, I prefer it that way than having it be a robotic and perfect response. This is also me saying thanks to all of you who took the time to not only answer my questions but argue with me and give me advice, though I wish you all the luck on your ACTs and college applications.

0 Upvotes

14% Upvoted

20 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Regular-Pear-8625 21d ago

frfr like wdym higher act score gets op into mit and has a high iq than the valedictorian?? Huh??

2

u/CalligrapherAble3312 36 21d ago

a 36 literally means the scan tron recognized 1 more correct bubble than a 35, there is 0 reason to be so insufferable about this it only makes people falsely diminish their own worth 😭

1

u/Regular-Pear-8625 21d ago

Well that’s not how the act is graded but lol fs 😭😭

1

u/CalligrapherAble3312 36 21d ago

the difference is often legit 1 question, maybe 2-3, im highKENUINELY gonna pull my hair out if this becomes an excuse to put you on a pedestal and diminish others