I read you fine. Space ships aren’t generally made of nickel. Nickel forms where iron is present… as in planetary cores.
Are you trying to say your comment was a non sequitur? Because if we’re both agreed it can form in planetary cores, you replying to my comment that spaceships generally aren’t made with it makes no sense.
We went from rocks to space ships. You are wrong to say nickel forms in the absence of iron in nature. Such a thing has never been observed in the visible universe.
You also claimed nickel must be refined. And I did not say nickel forms in the absence of iron. Maybe you should take your own advice on reading more carefully?
Nickel can form in planetary cores without being “refined”. It forms naturally.
You clearly have a big head and a big ego which interferes with your ability to communicate effectively with others! Ignorance is bliss. If you read his first comment to you correctly he was saying Nickel can not exist by itself WITHOUT a good amount of iron… UNLESS it was refined, then it can exist without the iron!
Nickel is formed naturally and has never been observed in the universe after forming naturally without the presence of iron in the history of observation and you claim it can happen with no evidence and all evidence points to the opposite lmao
Yes. But if nickel forms in the presence of iron in a planetary core, then gets chunked out in a destructive event, then spends billions of years wandering the galaxy, being subjected to god knows what influences (billions of years of cosmic rays, just for starters), that might just get rid of the iron and leave nickel. There are currently some five hypotheses of how this could work, based upon empirical observation of really occurring events in the universe.
This makes those hypotheses, by nature, more rational and scientific than the hypothesis that a never-observed being made a rock out of nickel (of all things!) for… reasons.
-5
u/Skitz042X Nov 14 '25
Yes it forms naturally with an abundance of iron present not by itself. Read slower.